The Impact of Using Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection
"The Impact of Using Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection" Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind, Multi-centre Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
701
1 country
2
Brief Summary
To compare conventional polyglactin 910 sutures with triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 antimicrobial sutures for the reduction of surgical site infections and any associated health and economic benefits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedJune 22, 2011
November 1, 2009
1.3 years
November 23, 2009
June 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Signs of Surgical Site Infections (SSI) according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria
30 days (or 1 year in case of prosthesis)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative hospital stay in days
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Study group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study group in which Triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 antimicrobial sutures will be used.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group in which polyglactin 910 antimicrobial sutures will be used.
Interventions
Triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 antimicrobial sutures (Vicryl Plus)
Polyglactin 910 antimicrobial sutures (Vicryl)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients of different age
- Gender
- Risk factors and procedures candidate for surgical intervention during the period of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an established pre-operative infection at the operative site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
- Amygate Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Al-Zeraaein Hospital
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Cairo University Kasr Al-Aini Hospital
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ibrahim Ga Ibrahim, MD
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2009
First Posted
November 25, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-11