NCT04248062

Brief Summary

lnborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are a heterogeneous group of rare, sometimes debilitating or even fatal diseases . In IEM, both definition and assessment of meaningful outcome parameters is often extremely difficult resulting in a limited body of evidence. Limited evidence results in weak recommendations which are perceived as unbinding and thus sustains heterogeneous study designs, choice of outcomes and interventions again producing non-uniform data. The goal of the current study is to identify and select reliable instruments, that measure patients' and their parents' perception about relevant (social, emotional, cognitive and physical) aspects in their lives. This set of instruments will secure the comparability of future research findings. Furthermore this instruments will improve the screening of paediatric IEM patients regarding their need for additional (psychosocial or consultative) support in daily hospital routine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
69

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 7, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 29, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 4, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Average importance of patient reported outcomes (PRO) after first Delphi survey

    Average importance-rating of the PROs in the total sample (experts, patients, parents, patient representatives); 9-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important, 2 = very important); Sum-Score for each PRO divided by number of survey-participants; Consensus about the importance of a PRO achieved if at least 70% of the voting participants from each stakeholder group scored between 7 and 9

    15 minutes (for Delphi survey 1)

  • Average importance of patient reported outcomes (PRO) after second Delphi survey

    Average importance-rating of the PROs in the total sample (experts, patients, parents, patient representatives); 9-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important, 2 = very important); Sum-Score for each PRO divided by number of survey-participants; Consensus about the importance of a PRO achieved if at least 70% of the voting participants from each stakeholder group scored between 7 and 9

    15 minutes (for Delphi survey 2)

Study Arms (3)

IEM experts

Heterogeneous group of health professionals (physicians, psychologists, nutritionists) working in the field of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (IEM)

Other: Survey

Paediatric IEM patients

IEM patients between 10 and 18 years

Other: Survey

Parents of paediatric IEM patients and patient representatives

* Parents of IEM patients (between 0 and 18 years) * Patient representatives

Other: Survey

Interventions

SurveyOTHER

Survey: 38 preselected patient and parent reported outcomes; rating scale: 9 point likert scale (1=not at all important - 9=very important)

IEM expertsPaediatric IEM patientsParents of paediatric IEM patients and patient representatives

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The included groups (experts, patients, parents/patient representatives) were all not randomly chosen. Experts are recruited based on the criteria of profession, specialization, experience and location. A sample as balanced as possible is intended. Patients and their parents are recruited based on IEM disease, disease severity, age and gender. A sample as balanced as possible is intended.

You may qualify if:

  • Suffering from rare IEM (e.g. phenylketonuria, urea cycle disorders, maple syrup urine disease, methylmalonic acidemia)
  • Ability to understand German language
  • Cognitive ability to complete the basic survey items
  • Ability to understand German language
  • Parents of a child suffering from IEM
  • More than 1 year of practical experience in the field of IEM
  • Ability to understand written English

You may not qualify if:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Severe cognitive impairment (ability to complete the Survey not existent)
  • No ability to understand German language
  • Less than 1 year of practical experience in the field of IEM
  • No ability to understand written English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Children's Hospital Zurich

Zurich, 8032, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Slade A, Isa F, Kyte D, Pankhurst T, Kerecuk L, Ferguson J, Lipkin G, Calvert M. Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Apr 23;13(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x.

    PMID: 29688860BACKGROUND
  • Morel T, Cano SJ. Measuring what matters to rare disease patients - reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Nov 2;12(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x.

    PMID: 29096663BACKGROUND
  • Zeltner NA, Landolt MA, Baumgartner MR, Lageder S, Quitmann J, Sommer R, Karall D, Muhlhausen C, Schlune A, Scholl-Burgi S, Huemer M. Living with Intoxication-Type Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Paediatric Patients and Their Parents. JIMD Rep. 2017;31:1-9. doi: 10.1007/8904_2016_545. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

    PMID: 26983835BACKGROUND
  • Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013 Aug 4;6:61-8. doi: 10.4137/HSI.S11093. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 25114561BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsUrea Cycle Disorders, InbornMaple Syrup Urine DiseasePhenylketonuriasMethylmalonic acidemiaOrnithine Carbamoyltransferase Deficiency DiseaseAmino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBrain Diseases, Metabolic, InbornBrain Diseases, MetabolicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesGenetic Diseases, X-Linked

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Martina Huemer

    University Children's Hospital, Zurich

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2019

First Posted

January 30, 2020

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

August 29, 2020

Study Completion

October 16, 2020

Last Updated

November 4, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

In the scheduled publication, sharing of individual's voting data is not planned. The investigator's research interest refers to the average importance-voting regarding the preselected PROs.

Locations