Neurobiology of Bulimia Nervosa
Ovarian Hormones, Reward Response, and Binge Eating in Bulimia Nervosa: An Experimental Design
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study experimentally manipulates ovarian hormones to examine the direct impact of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) on binge eating symptom burden and the behavioral reward response in women with bulimia nervosa (n=15). This is completed by taking medications that change ovarian hormone levels. This line of research could lead to the development of pharmacological interventions developed to target specific areas of the brain, brain receptors, or pathways identified to be involved in the mechanism underlying ovarian hormone change and binge eating.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Feb 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 4, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 26, 2022
CompletedJuly 26, 2022
June 1, 2022
2.1 years
January 8, 2020
June 20, 2022
July 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Change in Binge Eating Sum Score
Binge eating will be measured using the 8-item binge eating subscale of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI), which measures features of binge eating (e.g., consumption of large quantities of food, mindless eating) on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" to "very often." The EPSI scale is designed to assess behavior over the past 28 days; however, to be sensitive to the timeframe of the present study, the instructions will be modified to ask participants to consider the past week. Items are summed for a scale score ranging from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more frequent experiences with binge eating behavior. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)
Change in Weekly Average Binge-eating Frequency
Binge eating frequency is based on a daily diary of self-reported binge eating frequency. Scores can range from 0 to infinity as they represent a self-reported frequency. Subjects self-report the number of binge eating episodes they had each day. Higher numbers indicate more frequent binge eating episodes. Average weekly frequency will be determined based on daily reported binge eating frequency. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)
Change in Self-Reported Reward Sensitivity Subscale Score During Estradiol Manipulation
Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire will be used to measure reward sensitivity during estradiol intervention. The reward sensitivity subscale will be used, which is rated on a true/false scale with scores ranging 0-24. Higher scores indicate more sensitivity to reward. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Response Latency to Reward During the Monetary Incentive Delay Task During Estradiol Manipulation
Time (ms) between stimulus and response will be measured during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task during the win trials during the estradiol intervention. During the MID task, participants need to select the correct response during "win" and "lose" conditions by pressing a button. Higher scores indicate a longer response time to the win trials. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Delay Discounting Parameter k Using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire With Estradiol Manipulation
During the estradiol intervention, participants will be asked to make a series of hypothetical choices between small, sooner (impulsive) vs. larger, later (self controlled) hypothetical monetary outcomes. k is a hyperbolic function with larger k values indicating more valuation of a larger delayed reward and smaller values indicating preference for more immediate, smaller rewards (more impulsivity). Change is defined as the average change in k.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Self-Reported Behavioral Inhibition Score During Estradiol Manipulation
This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoidance of activities during the estradiol intervention. The Behavioural Inhibition subscale of the Behavioural Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) assesses behavioural inhibition (BI) using participant self-reports. The minimum score on the BIS subscale is 7, maximum 28. Greater scores indicate greater behavioural inhibition. Change is defined by an average change score
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Behavioral Activation Score During Estradiol Manipulation
This measures assesses individual disposition toward engaging in activities during the estradiol intervention. Two BIS/BAS behavioural activation (BA) subscales will be used. The BA subscales used are Fun Seeking and Drive. Each subscale is summed to get the respective subscale scores. The minimum score on BA Fun Seeking and BA Drive are minimum 4 and maximum 16. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral activation. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Behavioral Activation Reward Responsiveness With Estradiol Manipulation
This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoiding and engaging in activities during estradiol intervention. The BIS/BAS reward responsiveness subscale will be used. The minimum score on the BA Reward Responsiveness subscale is 5, maximum 20. Higher scores indicate greater reward responsiveness. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Change in Behavioral Inhibition During Estradiol Administration as Assessed Through a Behavioral Task
Behavioral response inhibition will be examined during a go/no-go computerized task during the estradiol intervention. Inhibitory control is defined by the response accuracy of the go no/go trials. Percent of errors is calculated as the number of "go" responses on a "no/go" trial" divided by the total number of "no/go" trials." Fewer errors ("go" response on a "no/go" trial) indicates better inhibitory control. Change is defined by an average change score.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Correlation Between Change in Reward Response and Change in Binge Eating Before and During Estradiol Manipulation
Pearson correlations between change in self-reported reward response and change in binge eating between baseline and estradiol intervention will be examined. Binge eating is defined as the sum score from the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory (EPSI). Self-reported reward response is defined as the BAS reward responsiveness subscale score and the Sensitivity to Reward/Sensitivity to Punishment Questionnaire (SPSRQ) sensitivity to reward subscale score. Change in binge eating and change in reward response between baseline and estradiol intervention was calculated and a correlation conducted between change scores.
Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Sequence A: estradiol followed by progesterone
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are randomly assigned to treatment Sequence A: after achieving hormone suppression using Lupron, participants begin the addback period and take study medications for 8 weeks. During the 8 week period, participants will take placebo or estradiol or progesterone. Participants will not know when or for how long they are on active medication (i.e., estradiol or progesterone) or inactive (i.e., placebo) medication. When active medication is administered, participants randomized to treatment sequence A will receive estradiol addback first, followed by progesterone. Estradiol and progesterone are never given simultaneously. Participants are on active medication for a total of 4 weeks.
Sequence B: progesterone followed by estradiol
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are randomly assigned to treatment Sequence B: after achieving hormone suppression using Lupron, participants begin the addback period and take study medications for 8 weeks. During the 8 week period, participants will take placebo or estradiol or progesterone. Participants will not know when or for how long they are on active medication (i.e., estradiol or progesterone) or inactive (i.e., placebo) medication. When active medication is administered, participants randomized to treatment sequence B will receive progesterone first followed by estradiol. Estradiol and progesterone are never given simultaneously. Participants are on active medication for a total of 4 weeks.
Interventions
During estradiol administration, 2mg of estradiol is given twice daily via oral capsule.
During progesterone administration, 200mg of progesterone is given twice daily via oral capsule.
Initial 3.75 mg intramuscular injection administered approximately Day 6 of menstrual cycle and then monthly thereafter for a total of 3 months.
Placebo is administered during the addback phase when participants are not taking active medication. Placebo is given so that medication administration occurs throughout the entire 8-week addback period in order to blind participants to when and for how long they are on the active medication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants will be women aged 18-42 with a current DSM-5 bulimia nervosa (BN) diagnosis who meet the below criteria. Only participants capable of giving informed consent and understanding the risks associated with the study will be enrolled.
- A regular menstrual cycle for at least three months
- \< 35 BMI \> 18.5
- Free of medication or medical condition that impacts ovarian hormones or is contraindicated for use with study interventions (including birth control pills)
- Speaks English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will not be permitted to enter this protocol if they have any of the following:
- peanut allergy
- bipolar or psychotic disorder;
- current substance use disorder or frequent binge drinking behavior;
- frequent diuretic or laxative use, ipecac use;
- currently smoking \> 10 cigarettes daily;
- history of a suicide attempt or current suicidal ideation;
- endometriosis;
- abnormal genital/vaginal bleeding;
- undiagnosed enlargement of the ovaries;
- liver disease;
- breast cancer;
- personal history of blood clots (a history of blood clots in the legs or lungs; DVT); pregnancy related blood clots
- history of seizures or epilepsy;
- porphyria;
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (37)
Baker JH, Girdler SS, Bulik CM. The role of reproductive hormones in the development and maintenance of eating disorders. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov 1;7(6):573-583. doi: 10.1586/eog.12.54.
PMID: 23585773BACKGROUNDEdler C, Lipson SF, Keel PK. Ovarian hormones and binge eating in bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med. 2007 Jan;37(1):131-41. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008956. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
PMID: 17038206BACKGROUNDKlump KL, Keel PK, Culbert KM, Edler C. Ovarian hormones and binge eating: exploring associations in community samples. Psychol Med. 2008 Dec;38(12):1749-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002997. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
PMID: 18307829BACKGROUNDLester NA, Keel PK, Lipson SF. Symptom fluctuation in bulimia nervosa: relation to menstrual-cycle phase and cortisol levels. Psychol Med. 2003 Jan;33(1):51-60. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006815.
PMID: 12537036BACKGROUNDPrice WA, Torem MS, DiMarzio LR. Premenstrual exacerbation of bulimia. Psychosomatics. 1987 Jul;28(7):378-9. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3182(87)72511-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 3438453BACKGROUNDMac Neil BA, Hudson CC, Dempsey K, Nadkarni P. A case of symptom relapse post placement of intrauterine device (IUD) in a patient with bulimia nervosa: consequence or coincidence. Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Jun;22(2):369-372. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0391-z. Epub 2017 Apr 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 28439806BACKGROUNDBarth C, Villringer A, Sacher J. Sex hormones affect neurotransmitters and shape the adult female brain during hormonal transition periods. Front Neurosci. 2015 Feb 20;9:37. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00037. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25750611BACKGROUNDYoest KE, Cummings JA, Becker JB. Estradiol, dopamine and motivation. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2014;14(2):83-9. doi: 10.2174/1871524914666141226103135.
PMID: 25540977BACKGROUNDFrank GK. Advances from neuroimaging studies in eating disorders. CNS Spectr. 2015 Aug;20(4):391-400. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000012. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
PMID: 25902917BACKGROUNDRichard JE, Lopez-Ferreras L, Anderberg RH, Olandersson K, Skibicka KP. Estradiol is a critical regulator of food-reward behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Apr;78:193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
PMID: 28214679BACKGROUNDKlump KL, Fowler N, Mayhall L, Sisk CL, Culbert KM, Burt SA. Estrogen moderates genetic influences on binge eating during puberty: Disruption of normative processes? J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Jul;127(5):458-470. doi: 10.1037/abn0000352. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
PMID: 29927265BACKGROUNDSchmidt PJ, Nieman LK, Danaceau MA, Adams LF, Rubinow DR. Differential behavioral effects of gonadal steroids in women with and in those without premenstrual syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 22;338(4):209-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801223380401.
PMID: 9435325BACKGROUNDBloch M, Schmidt PJ, Danaceau M, Murphy J, Nieman L, Rubinow DR. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;157(6):924-30. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.924.
PMID: 10831472BACKGROUNDBen Dor R, Harsh VL, Fortinsky P, Koziol DE, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ. Effects of pharmacologically induced hypogonadism on mood and behavior in healthy young women. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;170(4):426-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010117.
PMID: 23545794BACKGROUNDLee EE, Nieman LK, Martinez PE, Harsh VL, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ. ACTH and cortisol response to Dex/CRH testing in women with and without premenstrual dysphoria during GnRH agonist-induced hypogonadism and ovarian steroid replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;97(6):1887-96. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3451. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
PMID: 22466349BACKGROUNDNobles CJ, Thomas JJ, Valentine SE, Gerber MW, Vaewsorn AS, Marques L. Association of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder in a nationally representative epidemiological sample. Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Jul;49(7):641-50. doi: 10.1002/eat.22539. Epub 2016 May 20.
PMID: 27206163BACKGROUNDDamario MA, Hammitt DG, Galanits TM, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00444-6.
PMID: 10593380BACKGROUNDBourgain C, Devroey P, Van Waesberghe L, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC. Effects of natural progesterone on the morphology of the endometrium in patients with primary ovarian failure. Hum Reprod. 1990 Jul;5(5):537-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137138.
PMID: 2394784BACKGROUNDBerman KF, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR, Danaceau MA, Van Horn JD, Esposito G, Ostrem JL, Weinberger DR. Modulation of cognition-specific cortical activity by gonadal steroids: a positron-emission tomography study in women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8836-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8836.
PMID: 9238064BACKGROUNDBloch M, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ, Lotsikas A, Chrousos GP, Cizza G. Cortisol response to ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone in a model of pregnancy and parturition in euthymic women with and without a history of postpartum depression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Feb;90(2):695-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1388. Epub 2004 Nov 16.
PMID: 15546899BACKGROUNDRoca CA, Schmidt PJ, Deuster PA, Danaceau MA, Altemus M, Putnam K, Chrousos GP, Nieman LK, Rubinow DR. Sex-related differences in stimulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during induced gonadal suppression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4224-31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2525. Epub 2005 May 10.
PMID: 15886244BACKGROUNDSchmidt PJ, Steinberg EM, Negro PP, Haq N, Gibson C, Rubinow DR. Pharmacologically induced hypogonadism and sexual function in healthy young women and men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):565-76. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.24. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
PMID: 18354393BACKGROUNDSchmidt PJ, Martinez PE, Nieman LK, Koziol DE, Thompson KD, Schenkel L, Wakim PG, Rubinow DR. Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Symptoms Following Ovarian Suppression: Triggered by Change in Ovarian Steroid Levels But Not Continuous Stable Levels. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;174(10):980-989. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101113. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PMID: 28427285BACKGROUNDNaessen S, Carlstrom K, Bystrom B, Pierre Y, Hirschberg AL. Effects of an antiandrogenic oral contraceptive on appetite and eating behavior in bulimic women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Jun;32(5):548-54. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.008. Epub 2007 May 2.
PMID: 17475412BACKGROUNDRice VC, Richard-Davis G, Saleh AA, Ginsburg KA, Mammen EF, Moghissi K, Leach R. Fibrinolytic parameters in women undergoing ovulation induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;169(6):1549-53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90434-k.
PMID: 8267060BACKGROUNDMisra M, Katzman DK, Estella NM, Eddy KT, Weigel T, Goldstein MA, Miller KK, Klibanski A. Impact of physiologic estrogen replacement on anxiety symptoms, body shape perception, and eating attitudes in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa: data from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):e765-71. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08365.
PMID: 24021517BACKGROUNDStampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study. N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 12;325(11):756-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109123251102.
PMID: 1870648BACKGROUNDLukaszuk K, Liss J, Lukaszuk M, Maj B. Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.055.
PMID: 15866571BACKGROUNDFatemi HM, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Donoso P, Papanikolaou E, Devroey P. Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2628-32. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del117. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
PMID: 16857887BACKGROUNDFriedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bukovsky I, Ron-El R. Luteal support with micronized progesterone following in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist: a comparative study between vaginal and oral administration. Hum Reprod. 1999 Aug;14(8):1944-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.8.1944.
PMID: 10438404BACKGROUNDHumaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grondahl ML, Westergaard L, Andersen CY. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1213-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh765. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
PMID: 15760966BACKGROUNDMitwally MF, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. Prevention of bone loss and hypoestrogenic symptoms by estrogen and interrupted progestogen add-back in long-term GnRH-agonist down-regulated patients with endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome. Menopause. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):236-41. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200207000-00004.
PMID: 12082359BACKGROUNDWyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Ismail KM, Jones PW, O'Brien PM. The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without 'add-back' therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis. BJOG. 2004 Jun;111(6):585-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00135.x.
PMID: 15198787BACKGROUNDForbush KT, Wildes JE, Pollack LO, Dunbar D, Luo J, Patterson K, Petruzzi L, Pollpeter M, Miller H, Stone A, Bright A, Watson D. Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):859-78. doi: 10.1037/a0032639. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
PMID: 23815116BACKGROUNDFranken IH, Muris P, Georgieva I. Gray's model of personality and addiction. Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.022. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
PMID: 15964149BACKGROUNDHarrison A, O'Brien N, Lopez C, Treasure J. Sensitivity to reward and punishment in eating disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 15;177(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.06.010. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
PMID: 20381877BACKGROUNDKnutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593.
PMID: 10875899BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this trial was unable to enroll the number of participants needed to complete the study leading to only a very small number of participants.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jessica Baker, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Baker, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
February 24, 2020
Primary Completion
April 4, 2022
Study Completion
April 4, 2022
Last Updated
July 26, 2022
Results First Posted
July 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 18 to 24 months following publication.
- Access Criteria
- Approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable and execution of a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 18 to 24 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.