Mechanisms and Innovations in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
MIC
Evaluation of Mechanisms and Innovations in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of multiple modalities of cardiac resynchronisation therapy using high precision acute electrical and haemodynamic measurements.These modalities include biventricular pacing and conduction system pacing utilising His bundle and left bundle pacing. Conduction system pacing is a more physiological form of pacing. The study hypothesises that this will produce more effective cardiac resynchronisation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 22, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.1 years
November 4, 2019
March 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Acute change is systolic blood pressure
Mean change in systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from atrial pacing to AV sequential CRT pacing (HBP, LBP, epiBVP and combined HPB with epiLVP) at optimal AV delay measured in mmHg.
20 minutes
Acute electrical measurements
Mean change in left ventricular activation time (Milliseconds) (measured using ECGI) during AV sequential CRT pacing (HBP, LBP, epiBVP and combined HPB with epiLVP) at optimal AV delay measured in Milliseconds.
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Conduction system battery longevity
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.
Conduction system lead threshold
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.
Heart failure symptoms
6 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction
12 months
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Heart failure and abnormal cardiac conduction
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have an attempt at His-bundle pacing, left bundle pacing and biventricular pacing. Pacing at the His bundle and the left bundle will be attempted using a Medtronic SelectSecure™, Model 3830 lead. Delivery of the lead utilizes a deflectable sheath, the Medtronic SelectSite™, Model C304. Biventricular pacing will utilise a left ventricular lead placed in the coronary sinus using any of the 5 manufactures of CS leads Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Sorin, and St. Jude Medical or in participants receiving permanent conduction system pacing left ventricular pacing will be achieved using a Cordis ATW™ wire placed in the coronary sinus.
Interventions
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy can be achieved using biventricular pacing involving placement of three leads into the right atrium, right ventricle and coronary sinus (epicardial left ventricle). Alternatively the third lead may be placed at the bundle of His or left ventricular septum to pace the left bundle directly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred for conventional CRT
- Severe heart failure (LVEF, a measure of heart pumping, \< 35% - severe)
- Prolonged QRS duration (\>120ms)
- Adults willing to take part (age \> 18 years)
- Able to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give consent
- Children (age \< 18 years)
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS trust
London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Cleland JG, Abraham WT, Linde C, Gold MR, Young JB, Claude Daubert J, Sherfesee L, Wells GA, Tang AS. An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(46):3547-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht290. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PMID: 23900696BACKGROUNDVijayaraman P, Herweg B, Ellenbogen KA, Gajek J. His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Maximize Electrical Resynchronization: A Feasibility Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;12(2):e006934. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006934.
PMID: 30681348BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Zachary Whinnett, BM BS B
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2019
First Posted
January 9, 2020
Study Start
October 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 3 years
- Access Criteria
- Medtronic will only have access to anonymised data in the form of non-invasive electrical maps (ECGi, CardioInsight)
We plan to share the electrical data obtained from non-invasive electrical mapping with Medtronic (industry company)