HIS Alternative II - UK Site
Direct HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure Despite Optimal Medical Treatment and ECG With Typical Left Bundle Branch Block
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will investigate the feasibility of using direct HIS pacing or left bundle branch pacing (LBB pacing) as an alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ECG with a typical left bundle branch block pattern.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedApril 5, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.1 years
March 16, 2023
April 4, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Left ventricular end-systolic volume
Echocardiographic response after 6 months defined as decrease in left ventricular systolic volume of ≥ 15% of baseline
6 months
Success rate of implanting a HIS-bundle lead with capture of the left bundle branch or a LBB-lead with narrowing of QRS
The success rate of implanting a pacing lead to the HIS-bundle with capture of the left bundle at a threshold \< 2.5 V at 1 ms or implantation of a LBB lead with narrowing of the QRS duration and maintaining this effect at 6 month follow-up
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in LVEF and left ventricular chamber dimensions
6 months
Change in 6-min hall-walk test
6 months
Change in NYHA class
6 months
Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score
6 months
Shortening of QRS duration
6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HIS/LBB pacing
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm a right ventricular (RV) lead or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead is placed first and then implantation of a HIS-pacing lead is attempted. If it is not possible to find and pace HIS, to correct the LBBB or the threshold for correcting the LBBB is \> 2.5 V at 1 ms, implantation of a LBB-pacing lead is attempted instead. If that is not possible either, a left ventricular (LV) lead is implanted. Intervention: Device: HIS/LBB pacing
LV pacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm an RV-lead or ICD-lead is placed first and then implantation of a LV-pacing lead is attempted. If this is not possible due to anatomical difficulties (no coronary sinus (CS) access, no available branches other than v cordis anterior or v cordis media) or electrical difficulties (no capture below 4 V at 1.0 msec or phrenic nerve stimulation \< 2x pacing threshold), implantation of a HIS-pacing lead is attempted instead. If that is not possible or the threshold for correcting the LBBB is \> 2.5 V at 1 ms, implantation of a LBB-pacing lead is attempted instead. Intervention: Device: LV pacing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age, ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤ 35% assessed by echocardiography, NYHA class II-IV heart failure symptoms despite optimal medical treatment and
- Either planned new implantation of a biventricular pacing system (CRT-P or CRT-D), where the ECG is with sinus rhythm and a typical left bundle branch block (see definition below)
- Or planned upgrade of an existing pacemaker or ICD to a biventricular pacing system (CRT-P or CRT-D), where the ECG is with sinus rhythm and a typical left bundle branch block or there has been\> 90% right ventricular pacing from an existing pacemaker for at least 2 months prior to enrollment
- Signed informed consent
- Typical left bundle branch block:
- QRS width \> 130 msec for women and \> 140 msec for men QS or rS pattern in leads V1 and V2, and mid-QRS plateau phase with or without extras in at least 2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL
You may not qualify if:
- Existing biventricular pacing system
- Permanent atrial fibrillation
- Severe renal failure with eGFR \< 30 ml/min
- AMI or CABG within the last three months
- The patient does not want to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trustlead
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hammersmith Hospital
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and the staff performing and evaluating echocardiography and hall-walk tests are blinded to the treatment arm
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2023
First Posted
April 14, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months following final recruitment
Will share data with international arm of the project NCT04409119