Improving Aging in Place in Subsidized Housing
Improving Aging in Place for Older Adults in Subsidized Housing
2 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
13
Brief Summary
This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted version of the Function Focused Care intervention, delivered by telephone, for improving aging in place for older adults living in subsidized housing. The study will include participants with and without mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia and will examine whether the study outcomes differ by cognitive status. Findings from this study will provide new information about how to optimize function and physical activity among older adults with and without cognitive impairment living in subsidized housing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2024
CompletedNovember 15, 2024
November 1, 2024
3 years
December 16, 2019
August 6, 2024
November 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Change in Precipitating Events Project (PEP) Functional Status Scale From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention Sites and Waitlist Control Sites
Self-reported ability to perform 7 ADLs, 5 IADLs, and 3 mobility tasks (Range, 0-30; higher scores indicate more functional impairment)
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery Score From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Objective measure of lower extremity functioning in older adults (Range, 0-12; higher scores indicate worse lower extremity functioning) The measure will be collected only if in-person contact is possible during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Average Step Counts From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Measured using Fitbit
Measured continuously from 0-2 months
Change in Time Spent in Differing Levels of Activity From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Measured using Fitbit (minutes spent in each of 4 levels of activity: sedentary; lightly active; fairly active; very active)
Measured continuously from 0-2 months
Change in Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) Score From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Self-reported physical activity (Range, 0-793; higher scores indicate greater physical activity)
Baseline, 2 months
Feasibility of Study Recruitment, Measured as Percentage of Eligible Participants Recruited
Assessed using participant responses to invitation to participate in the study (enrolled vs. refused)
0-4 months
Feasibility of Study Retention, Measured as Percentage of Participants Retained Over Study Follow-up
Assessed as percentage of participants who remain enrolled in the study
0-4 months
Acceptability Assessed Using a Survey Question
Self-reported acceptability of the intervention (5-point Likert scale ranging from very unacceptable (1) to very acceptable (5); higher numbers indicate higher acceptability)
2 months
Number of Participants With High Fidelity to Treatment Protocol, Measured Using Fidelity Checklist
Number of participants with \>80% fidelity to treatment protocol, measured using fidelity checklist including each study protocol task
0-4 months
Fidelity to Motivational Interviewing, Measured Using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Scale (MITI 4)
Assessed by psychologist (4 global scores, scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high))
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Scale From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS Short Form) Score From Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites
Baseline, 2 months
Percentage of Participants With a Hospitalization During the Study Period (Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites)
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Number of Hospitalizations During the Study Period (Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites)
Baseline, 2 months
Percentage of Participants With an Emergency Department Visit During the Study Period (Baseline to 2 Months for Immediate Intervention and Waitlist Control Sites)
Baseline, 2 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Immediate Intervention
EXPERIMENTALUpon enrollment, participants receive the adapted telephone-based intervention, the Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing, for two consecutive months.
Wait-list Control
EXPERIMENTALTwo months after study enrollment, participants receive the adapted telephone-based intervention, the Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing, for two consecutive months.
Interventions
Two-month program intended to increase physical activity and function, including the following 4 steps: 1. Environmental and Policy Assessments: Nurse facilitator works with the affordable housing staff to identify and recommend feasible interventions to alter the environment, policy, and procedures to optimize resident function and physical activity. 2. Education: Nurse educates residents and study partners in the principles of the Independent Living Program, using established materials and adult learning techniques. 3. Establishing Resident Goals: The nurse completes Capability Assessment Forms and helps resident set goals to increase function and physical activity. 4. The nurse helps to motivate and mentor residents and study partners to achieve and maintain their goals, using evidence-based approaches.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lives in an included subsidized housing setting
- years of age or older
- Speaks English or Spanish well or very well
- Able to provide informed consent OR able to provide assent and has a proxy who provides informed consent on his/her behalf
- Has difficulty or needs help in at least 1 ADL and/or IADL OR has mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia based on their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score
- Not enrolled in hospice
- Speaks English or Spanish well or very well
- Able to provide informed consent
- Spends at least an hour per week with the resident
- Speaks English or Spanish well or very well
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 62 years of age
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Lacks decision making capacity and lacks a proxy to consent on his/her behalf
- Does not have functional impairment or cognitive impairment
- Has moderate to severe dementia based on his/her MoCA score
- Is enrolled in hospice
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Does not spend at least an hour per week with the resident
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Unable to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pennsylvanialead
- University of California, Berkeleycollaborator
- HumanGoodcollaborator
- University of Maryland, Baltimorecollaborator
- Diocesan Housing Services Corporation of the Diocese of Camden, Inccollaborator
- Fair Share Housing Developmentcollaborator
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (13)
Northgate 2
Camden, New Jersey, 08102, United States
Haven House
Cape May, New Jersey, 08204, United States
Victorian Towers
Cape May, New Jersey, 08204, United States
Stonegate 1
Pennsauken, New Jersey, 08109, United States
Stonegate 2
Pennsauken, New Jersey, 08109, United States
Mantua Presbyterian Apartments
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Old City Presbyterian Apartments
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Casa Carmen Aponte
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122, United States
Neumann Senior Housing
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19125, United States
St. Francis VIlla
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19125, United States
Paschall Senior Housing
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19142, United States
Greenway Presbyterian Apartments
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19143, United States
Jackson Place
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19148, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was conducted during the COVID pandemic. Due to challenges with participant follow-up in the setting of the pandemic, outcome data is missing for multiple participants.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Rebecca Brown
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rebecca Brown, MD, MPH
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty - Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2019
First Posted
December 27, 2019
Study Start
January 13, 2020
Primary Completion
January 24, 2023
Study Completion
March 2, 2023
Last Updated
November 15, 2024
Results First Posted
November 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- At the end of the 3 year study period for the full parent study
- Access Criteria
- Identification of the purpose for wanting the data
Will share data based on request and following the development of an IPD sharing plan with the IRB.