NCT04300413

Brief Summary

During a hospital stay, older adults often become physically deconditioned and lose their ability to perform activities of daily living. Afterwards, they commonly require rehabilitation in a skilled nursing facility to regain independence. Even at discharge, however, many older adults are still far below their pre-hospitalization level of function making them at risk for adverse events such as falls, rehospitalizations, and loss of independence. Two reasons for inadequate outcomes may include that 1) physical and occupational therapy interventions are delivered at too low an intensity to incur substantial physiological gains, and 2) residents are largely sedentary outside of structured therapy time. These two problems represent critical targets for interventions that optimize care in skilled nursing facilities. Therefore, the investigators designed High-Intensity Rehabilitation + Mobility (HeRo), a patient-centered approach to skilled nursing facility care that incorporates a combination of high-intensity (i.e. high resistance, low repetition) functionally-based resistance training along with a structured mobility program outside of therapy time. HeRo includes: 1) a team approach to patient-centered care; 2) a physical activity intervention that incorporates principals of behavioral economics, which uses incentives, goal setting, and gamification to optimize patient engagement and health outcomes and 3) a challenging, high-intensity rehabilitation intervention that pushes patients to expand their limits. The investigators expect that HeRo will improve physical function and physical activity while reducing sedentary time for older adults in the skilled nursing facility. The study team will assess the feasibility and acceptability of HeRo for multiple stakeholders including patients, physical and occupational therapists, nursing staff, and administration. This research will improve patient care in the skilled nursing facility environment, getting older adults on a fast track to developing independence after a hospital stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 16, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2020

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 9, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 9, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 13, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 24, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gait Speed

    Time it takes to walk 4 meters (meters per second)

    Change from date of admission into the SNF to date of discharge from the SNF, which would be an approximate average of 21 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    Change from date of admission into the SNF to date of discharge from the SNF, which would be an approximate average of 21 days

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Patient Satisfaction Survey

    At date of discharge after their stay in the Skilled Nursing Facility, (approximately 21 days after admission).

  • Physical Activity (upright time)

    Measured during the last 5 days before discharge date from Skilled Nursing Facility (approximate average length of stay 21 days).

  • Physical Activity (sedentary time)

    Measured during the last 5 days before discharge date from Skilled Nursing Facility (approximate average length of stay 21 days).

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility (HeRo)

EXPERIMENTAL

The HeRo group will receive a behavior-change intervention based in the principals of behavioral economics to improve mobility. Physical and occupational therapists have been trained to deliver a high-intensity, functional intervention as the standard of care in this skilled nursing facility.

Other: High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility (HeRo)

Interventions

Progressive, high-intensity strengthening and functional intervention coupled with structured mobility based in principals of behavioral economics.

High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility (HeRo)

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults over 50 who are admitted to a skilled nursing facility following hospitalization
  • Qualify to receive at least physical therapy services
  • Ambulatory prior to hospitalization

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with neurological disorders such as acute stroke or acute traumatic brain injury
  • Patients on hospice care
  • Patient with conditions where strength training is contraindicated (as indicated by the American College of Sports Medicine Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription):
  • Recent unstable fracture
  • Advanced congestive heart failure
  • Bone metastasis sites
  • Tumors in strengthening target areas
  • Acute Illness
  • Recent myocardial infarction (within 3-6 weeks)
  • Weight bearing restrictions on graft or fracture sites
  • Exposed tendon or muscle
  • Absence of pedal pulses
  • Presence of fistula
  • Platelet levels \<50,000/μL
  • Weight-bearing precautions and inability to ambulate prior to hospitalization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Veterans Community Living Center at Fitzsimmons

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Mallinson T, Deutsch A, Bateman J, Tseng HY, Manheim L, Almagor O, Heinemann AW. Comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after hip fracture repair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

    PMID: 23850612BACKGROUND
  • Simning A, Caprio TV, Seplaki CL, Temkin-Greener H, Szanton SL, Conwell Y. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Functioning Following Nursing Home or Inpatient Rehabilitation. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):864-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

    PMID: 30056009BACKGROUND
  • Grant PM, Granat MH, Thow MK, Maclaren WM. Analyzing free-living physical activity of older adults in different environments using body-worn activity monitors. J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr;18(2):171-84. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.2.171.

    PMID: 20440029BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Range of Motion, Articular

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical ExaminationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD

    University of Colorado School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a single arm study but will use two historical cohorts as comparison groups to assess outcomes: 1) usual care and 2) high-intensity, functionally based resistance training alone. The historical cohorts were included in a previous study (Clinical Trials Registry identifier: E2193-P). This design will include independent cohorts of patients within a single SNF, using the facility as its own control. This design optimally controls for facility-level variables that vary widely between SNFs and may influence care delivery, such as staffing levels, staff experience, and productivity standards.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2020

First Posted

March 9, 2020

Study Start

February 16, 2020

Primary Completion

February 9, 2022

Study Completion

February 9, 2022

Last Updated

July 13, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations