The Socioeconomic Status and Child Characteristics on the Physical Therapy Outcome in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
The Factors as Socioeconomic Status and Child Characteristics That May Impact on the Progress of Development After Physical Therapy Interventions in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main outcome of physical therapy interventions is the progress of gross motor functions which result from the interactions between many factors not limited to physical, medical or surgical interventions but also including child characteristics and socializing agents. Aim of the study: To determine the effect of socioeconomic status (SES), child characteristics (age, sex, severity, and type of cerebral palsy) on the progress of gross motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Methods: Prospective cohort study on eighty children (44 boys, 36 girls) aging 3.11 ± 0.88 years old, diagnosed as spastic cerebral palsy. The gross motor function measure (GMFM-88) between two-time intervals with follow-up time 6 months Results: The median of the mean difference for the GMFM scores was related to socioeconomic status, age, sex, severity, and type of CP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 26, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
November 1, 2019
7 months
November 9, 2019
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
gross motor function measure
The Gross motor function measure (GMFM-88) is a valid clinical assessment tool designed to evaluate gross motor function, and its change over time in children with cerebral palsy (Russell, 2013). (GMFM-88) consists of 88 items in five dimensions A: Lying and Rolling (17 items), B: Sitting (20 items), C: Crawling and Kneeling (14 items), D: Standing (13 items), and E: Walking, Running and Jumping( 24 items). Each item was scored as 0 - does not initiate, 1 - initiates, 2 - partially completes, and 3 - completed, or not tested. The GMFM total scores is summation of the scores for all dimensions and dividing by 5. A percentage score was calculated for total score so it ranges from 0 to 100.
20 minutes
Study Arms (1)
factors ( SES,age, sex,severity) and progress
EXPERIMENTALthe relation between progress in gross motor functions
Interventions
NDT bases on neuroplasticity by which the brain change and reorganize itself and its processes according to practice and experience by a) facilitation of normal postural alignment and movement patterns; b) inhibition of the involvement during developmental and functional activities; and c) using sensory feedback (manual contact, visual integration, somatosensory reinforcement) for recovering function
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all children with spastic cerebral palsy under four years old age
You may not qualify if:
- with associated disorders, congenital anomalies, perceptual disorders, had IQ below 80% or had another diagnosis ( nerve lesion, genetic disorders).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zeinab Husseinlead
- Cairo Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Zeinab Hussein
Cairo, Dokki, 11432, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
1. Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, et al. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34(6):547-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar 2. Reeuwijk A, Van Schie PEM, Becher JG, et al. Effects of botulinum toxin type A on upper limb functions in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(5):375-87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. 3. El-Tallawy, H. N., Farghaly, W. M., Shehata, G. A., Rageh, T. A., Metwally, N. A., Badry, R., … Kandil, M. R.. Cerebral palsy in Al-Quseir City, Egypt: prevalence, subtypes, and risk factors. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2014; 10, 1267-1272. 5- O'Shea TM, Preisser JS, Klinepeter KL, et al. Trends in mortality and cerebral palsy in a geographically based cohort of very low birth weight neonates born between1982 to 1994. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4 pt 1):642-[PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6- Shamsoddini AR, Hollisaz MT. Effect of sensory integration therapy on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Iran J Child Neurology. 2009;3(1):43- 8. [Google Scholar] 7- McCullough N, Parkes J, Kerr C, McDowell BC(2013): The health of children and young people with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal, population-based study. Int J Nurs Stud. 50(6):747-756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8- O'Shea, T. M. (2008). Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cerebral palsy in near-term/term infants. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 51(4), 816. 9- Saifi, S., & Mehmood, T. (2011). Effects of socio-economic status on students achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1(2), 119-128. 10- Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., & Posner, S. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. Jama, 294(22), 2879-2888. 11- Baker, E. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society, 2210-2214. 12- Sundrum, R., Logan, S., Wallace, A., & Spencer, N. (2005). Cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status: a retrospective cohort study. Archives of disease in childhood, 90(1), 15-18. 13- Inchley, J. C., Currie, D. B., Todd, J. M., Akhtar, P. C., & Currie, C. E. (2005). Persistent socio-demographic differences in physical activity among Scottish schoolchildren 1990-2002. The European Journal of Public Health, 15(4), 386-388. 14- Myklebust G, Jahnsen R, Elkjaer S. (2009): Registration of interventions in children with cerebral palsy during three years-a population based study. [Scientific Poster Abstracts]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 51:65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03452_2.x 15- Palisano R, Begnoche DM, Chiarello LA, et al (2012): Amount and focus of physical therapy and occupational therapy for young children with cerebral palsy. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 32(4):368-82. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.715620. PubMed PMID: 22954372 16- Mutlu, A., Livanelioglu, A., & Gunel, M. K. (2008). Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 9(1), 44. 17- Palisano, R. J., Hanna, S. E., Rosenbaum, P. L., Russell, D. J., Walter, S. D., Wood, E. P., ... & Galuppi, B. E. (2000). Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical therapy, 80(10), 974-985. 18- WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. (World HealthOrganization. 19- Law,M., & Darrah, J. (2014). Emerging therapy approaches: An emphasis on function. Journal of ChildNeurology, 29(8), 1101-1107. doi:10.1177/0883073814533151 20- Anttila, H., Autti-Rämö, I., Suoranta, J., Mäkelä, M., & Malmivaara, A. (2008). Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. BMC pediatrics, 8(1), 14. 21- Russell, D. J., Rosenbaum, P. L., Wright, M., & Avery, L. M. (2013). Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) User's Manual. High Holborn, UK, Mac Keith Press. 22- El-Gilany, A., El-Wehady, A., & El-Wasify, M. (2012). Updating and validation of the socioeconomic status scale for health research in Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 18(9). 23- Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2), 1-5. 24- Malik, F., & Marwaha, R. (2018). Development, Stages of Social Emotional Development In Children. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
zeinab hussein
pediatric physical therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- the data about socioeconomic status did not be announced
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2019
First Posted
November 13, 2019
Study Start
January 6, 2019
Primary Completion
July 23, 2019
Study Completion
December 26, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- according to time of publication
on line publication