Psychological Health in Military Personnel
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study is designed to compare the efficacy of a simple, non-spiritual, self-management strategy that can strengthen personal and occupational resources-resources that can positively impact adverse reactions to military-specific demands and promote personal and work outcomes. Our app-based intervention, designed to strengthen a balanced self-identity through affirmation of growth and balance values, will be adapted to military occupational contexts, utilizing an existing self-management strategy (QE) to a military occupational context to maximize it effectiveness in strengthening participants' balanced sense of self, which we expect to have positive benefit on personal and work outcomes in military service members.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
6 months
October 1, 2019
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quiet Ego
Change between baseline and five weeks, the Quiet Ego Scale (QES; Wayment, Bauer, \& Sylaska, 2014) will be used to assess an identity that strikes a balance between a strong sense of agency (but not egoism) and a strong concern for the welfare of others. The QES is comprised of 14 items arranged in a 5-point Likert-type format with responses ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Sample items include: "I try to look at everybody's side of a disagreement before I make a decision" and "for me, life has been a continuous process of learning, changing, and growth." Higher scores on the QES indicate a stronger quiet ego. The QES has been found to have adequate internal validity (α = .76 to .78; (Wayment et al., 2014).
Baseline, 5 weeks
Self-Image
The self-image and compassionate goals scale developed by Crocker and Canevello (2008) will be used to assess the change in self-image between baseline and five weeks. The scale is comprised of 13 items total with six items assessing self-image goals. The scale is arranged in a 5-point Likert-type format with responses ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Always). All items begin with the phrase, "In the past week, in the area of friendships, how much did you want to or try to..." Six of the items assess self-image goals such as, "get others to recognize or acknowledge your positive qualities" and "avoid taking risks or making mistakes." Higher scores for the self-image subscale represents a higher endorsement of self-image.
Baseline, 5 weeks
Compassioante Goals
The self-image and compassionate goals scale developed by Crocker and Canevello (2008) will be used to assess the change in compassionate goals between baseline and five weeks. The scale is comprised of 13 items total with seven items assessing compassionate goals. The scale is arranged in a 5-point Likert-type format with responses ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Always). All items begin with the phrase, "In the past week, in the area of friendships, how much did you want to or try to..." Seven items asses compassionate goals such as, "be supportive of others" and "make a positive difference in someone else's life." Higher scores for the compassionate goals subscale represents a higher endorsement of compassionate goals.
Baseline, 5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Spiritual Fitness
Baseline, 5 weeks
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Baseline, 5 weeks
High Risk Demands
Baseline, 5 weeks
Traditional Occupational Demands
Baseline, 5 weeks
Work Overload
Baseline, 5 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (10)
Resilience to Adverse Events
Baseline, 5 weeks
Aggression
Baseline, 5 weeks
Physiological-based stress
Baseline, 5 weeks
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
BRAVE Group
EXPERIMENTALThe BRAVE program aims to examine the effectiveness of an intervention strategy designed to increase personal and work outcomes through the strengthening of quiet ego characteristics. The BRAVE intervention (delivered over four weeks) will ask study participants to use the app each week, with specific instructions on selecting one section each week and first listening to the longer version and reflect. At least two other times during the week they will be asked to listen to a recording of their choice on the same topic. On the final week (week 5) all participants (experimental and control) will return to the lab to complete post-study assessment tools (SART, post-study on-line questionnaire, provide a urine sample, and weight measurement).
Time Management Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe time management program aims to examine the effectiveness of an intervention strategy designed to increase personal and work outcomes through the strengthening of time management characteristics. The time management intervention (delivered over four weeks) will ask study participants to use the time management version of the app each week, with specific instructions on selecting one section each week and first listening to the longer version and reflect. At least two other times during the week they will be asked to listen to a recording of their choice on the same topic. On the final week (week 5) all participants (experimental and control) will return to the lab to complete post-study assessment tools (SART, post-study on-line questionnaire, provide a urine sample, and weight measurement).
Interventions
Direction Check is a simple, inexpensive app that builds resilience through balanced values to target the everyday personal and occupational stressors faced by military populations.
Direction Check (Time Management Version) is a simple, inexpensive app that builds resilience through time management exercises to target the everyday personal and occupational stressors faced by military populations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All participants in the study will include males and females between the ages of 17-70 years. Participants of all racial and ethnic backgrounds will be eligible to participate. Participants of all religious and spiritual orientations will be eligible to participate. Participants must be active-duty military personnel.
You may not qualify if:
- None.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann Huffman, PhD
Northern Arizona University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2019
First Posted
October 30, 2019
Study Start
February 11, 2020
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share