Efficacy of Three Online Well-Being Programs to Improve Work-Related Outcomes
A Randomized Trial Examining the Impact of Three 8-week Online Well-Being Programs on Employment-Related Absenteeism, Engagement, Burnout, Stress, and Resilience
1 other identifier
interventional
6,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Participants will be randomly assigned between three well-being programs, and assessed with questionnaires before and after the 8-week program, as well as 1-month after the end of the program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 14, 2018
CompletedAugust 1, 2018
July 1, 2018
5 months
October 2, 2017
July 31, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Absenteeism (Health and Performance Questionnaire, HPQ [World Health Organization (WHO), 2002])
An 8-item subset of the HPQ focusing on job absenteeism and work quality. Participants will be asked to indicate how many times in the past week they missed part of/an entire work day due to problems with their physical or mental health, and to indicate how often in the past 7 days the quality of their work suffered (e.g., how often they found themselves not working as carefully as they should).
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Work Engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale [Schaufeli et al., 2002])
A 2-item subset of the UWES focusing on job resilience and perseverance. Participants will be asked to indicate how frequently they feel mentally resilient at their job and how frequently they persevere.
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory [Maslach & Jackson, 1981])
A 5-item subset of the MBI focusing on feeling burned out in work settings. Participants will be asked to indicate the extent to which they agree that they feel burned out (e.g., that they feel burned out from their work or feel frustrated by their job).
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Job-Related Stress (Stress-related Presenteeism Scale [Gilbreath & Frew, 2008])
A 6-item measure of job stress-related presenteeism. Participants will be asked to indicate how frequently they suffer from stress-related presenteeism is work (e.g., they are unable to concentrate on their job at work, or stress distracts their attention away from job tasks).
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Resilience (composite of Perceived Stress Scale [Cohen et al., 1983], Happify Scale [Carpenter et al., 2016] and Life Orientation Scale, Revised [Scheier & Carver, 1985]).
Composite score made of perceived stress, positive emotionality, and optimism. Perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Cohen, Kamarck, \& Mermelstein, 1983), a 10-item questionnaire that asks users to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often) how frequently they experience various symptoms of feeling stress. Positive emotionality was measured using the emotion subscale of the Happify Scale (HS-E; Carpenter, Crutchley, Zilca, Schwartz, Smith, Cobb, \& Parks, 2016), which is a 4-item scale asking participants to rate the extent to which, over the past week, they have experienced positive and negative emotions that are activated or de-activated. Optimism was measured using the Life Orientation Scale, Revised (LOT-R; Scheier \& Carver, 1985), a 6-item scale on which participants rate the extent to which they identify with optimistic or pessimistic beliefs.
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Absenteeism (Healthy Days measure [Center for Disease Control (CDC), 2000])
A 1-item measure of the extent to which poor physical/mental health prevents one from doing their usual activities, such as self-care, work, or recreation, in the past 30 days \[CDC, 2002\].
Change from baseline to 8-week post, 1-month follow-up
Study Arms (3)
Unchanged Happify
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants use Happify as it is currently available to consumers on the main site, including all engagement elements. Users may access a wide variety of 4-week programs and use them in any way they desire for the entire study period.
Active control
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants complete a Happify program that is designed to engage with specific activities, but that does not aim to promote positive emotion or reduce negative emotion. Participants gain access to 8 weeks worth of content, but may repeat the content as often as they like in the follow-up period.
Distraction condition
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants complete a series of quizzes and polls on Happify designed to engage them in thinking about well-being topics, but without giving any specific instructions for how to promote well-being. Participants gain access to 8 weeks worth of content, but may repeat the content as often as they like in the follow-up period.
Interventions
An online platform for conveying techniques from positive psychology, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No prior experience on the Happify platform (new user registration)
- Full-time employment
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Happify Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
Happify (an online platform -- study is entirely online)
New York, New York, 10012, United States
Related Publications (1)
Carpenter J, Crutchley P, Zilca RD, Schwartz HA, Smith LK, Cobb AM, Parks AC. Seeing the "Big" Picture: Big Data Methods for Exploring Relationships Between Usage, Language, and Outcome in Internet Intervention Data. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 31;18(8):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5725.
PMID: 27580524BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2017
First Posted
October 11, 2017
Study Start
October 24, 2017
Primary Completion
March 14, 2018
Study Completion
March 14, 2018
Last Updated
August 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07