Selegiline and Reward Processing
The Effects of a Single Dose on Reward and Emotional Processing in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There has been growing interest in the relationship between reward processing and clinical symptoms of depression such as anhedonia (loss of interest and response to pleasurable activities). The aim of the study is to investigate the acute effects of a single dose of selegiline (an irreversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor) on reward and emotional processing in healthy volunteers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2020
CompletedOctober 17, 2019
September 1, 2019
12 months
September 24, 2019
October 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Total monetary amount won in reward learning task.
During this task participants have to repeatedly choose between 2 options. On each trial one of the options, if chosen by the participant, will result in the participant winning money. The participant simply has to learn which is the best option to choose so as to win as much money as possible.
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Reaction times (milliseconds) in reward learning task
During this task participants have to repeatedly choose between 2 options. On each trial one of the options, if chosen by the participant, will result in the participant winning money. The participant simply has to learn which is the best option to choose so as to win as much money as possible.
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Reward sensitivity in reward learning task
During this task participants have to repeatedly choose between 2 options. On each trial one of the options, if chosen by the participant, will result in the participant winning money. The participant simply has to learn which is the best option to choose so as to win as much money as possible.
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Reaction Time (milliseconds) on the Faces Dot Probe Task (FDOT)
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Reaction time (milliseconds) in an Emotional Categorisation Task (ECAT)
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Performance (number of words recalled) in an emotional recall task (EREC)
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Percentage Accuracy(%) on facial expression recognition task (FERT)
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
Reaction times (milliseconds) on facial expression recognition task (FERT)
Tested one hour after selegiline/placebo ingestion
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Selegiline Group
EXPERIMENTAL27 healthy participants who will be administered a single 10mg tablet of selegiline hydrochloride.
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATOR27 healthy participants who will be administered a single lactose tablet (placebo)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- Able to give informed consent for study participation
- Sufficient fluency in English to understand and complete the neuropsychological tasks
You may not qualify if:
- Current usage of other regular medication (including the contraceptive pill, the Depo-Provera injection or the progesterone implant, and hormone replacement therapy)
- Any past or current Axis 1 DSM-IV psychiatric disorder
- Significant medical condition
- Pulse \< 60 beats per minute at baseline screening
- Current or past gastro-intestinal disorder or irritable bowel syndrome
- Current pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Known lactate deficiency or any other problem absorbing lactose, galactose or glucose
- Current or past history of drug or alcohol dependency
- Participation in a psychological or medical study involving the use of medication within the last 3 months
- Previous participation in a study using the same, or similar, emotional processing tasks
- Smoker \> 5 cigarettes per day
- Typically drinks \> 6 caffeinated drinks per day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oxford
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7JZ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Vrieze E, Pizzagalli DA, Demyttenaere K, Hompes T, Sienaert P, de Boer P, Schmidt M, Claes S. Reduced reward learning predicts outcome in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 1;73(7):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
PMID: 23228328BACKGROUNDAdmon R, Pizzagalli DA. Dysfunctional Reward Processing in Depression. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015 Aug 1;4:114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.011.
PMID: 26258159BACKGROUNDKrystal JH, Sanacora G, Duman RS. Rapid-acting glutamatergic antidepressants: the path to ketamine and beyond. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):1133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.03.026.
PMID: 23726151BACKGROUNDMachado-Vieira R, Salvadore G, Diazgranados N, Zarate CA Jr. Ketamine and the next generation of antidepressants with a rapid onset of action. Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;123(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 May 3.
PMID: 19397926BACKGROUNDHeinonen EH, Anttila MI, Nyman LM, Pyykko KA, Vuorinen JA, Lammintausta RA. Inhibition of platelet monoamine oxidase type B by selegiline. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Jul;37(7):597-601. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04341.x.
PMID: 9243352BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine Harmer, PhD
University of Oxford
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A randomisation code will be drawn up by a researcher not involved in the study using a randomisation tool online (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists). The study randomisation code will be kept in a sealed envelope in a dedicated cabinet in Neurosciences Building of The Department of Psychiatry. At the end of the study, the randomisation blind will be broken by the principal investigator by opening the randomisation code envelope. Blinding will be achieved by identical encapsulation of the selegiline and the placebo using the Departmental Standard Operating Procedure for drug encapsulation.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2019
First Posted
October 17, 2019
Study Start
September 18, 2019
Primary Completion
September 10, 2020
Study Completion
September 10, 2020
Last Updated
October 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09