7-day Atorvastatin and Emotional Processing
The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action. The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of atorvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that atorvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2020
CompletedDecember 1, 2020
November 1, 2020
8 months
May 20, 2019
November 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Accuracy and reaction times during facial expression recognition task
Faces representing varying degrees \[from "neutral" (0%) to "full prototypical emotion" (100%) of basic emotions (happiness, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise)\] are displayed on the screen and participants are asked to quickly and correctly classify them. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Accuracy and reaction times during faces dot-probe task
Faces acting as positive or negative emotional stimuli (happy or fearful facial expressions) are presented together with a matched neutral face. One is presented above and one below a central fixation point. Subsequently, a probe appears behind one of the two faces and participants are asked to quickly indicate the position of the probe. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Accuracy and reaction times during emotional categorisation task
Words describing positive and negative personality characteristics are presented, and participants are asked to quickly indicate whether they would like or dislike being described with the presented word. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Accuracy during emotional recall task
After a delay from the Emotional categorisation task, participants are asked to recall and write down as many words as possible from it. Accuracy in recall of positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Accuracy and reaction times during emotional recognition memory task
The original personality descriptors in the Emotional categorisation task, plus an equal number of matched distractor words, are presented, and participants are asked to indicate whether they recognise it from the Emotional categorisation task. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy and reaction times during reward processing
Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Changes in C-Reactive Protein levels
A blood sample will be drawn on the day of randomisation and on the day of the research visit (i.e. after the seventh day on atorvastatin or placebo)
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive lactose placebo tablets, encapsulated in opaque capsules, and will be asked to take one capsule daily for seven days at night-time, by mouth
Atorvastatin
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 20mg atorvastatin tablets, encapsulated in opaque capsules, and will be asked to take one capsule daily for seven days at night-time, by mouth
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female
- Aged 18-50 years
- Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks
- Body Mass Index in the range of 18-30
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Not currently taking any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
You may not qualify if:
- Currently any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
- History or current significant psychiatric illness
- Current alcohol or substance misuse disorder
- History or current significant hepatic disease
- History or current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drug (i.e. atorvastatin)
- Pregnant, breast feeding, women of child-bearing potential not using appropriate contraceptive measures
- Participation in a study that uses the same or similar computer tasks as those used in the present study
- Participation in a study that involves the use of a medication within the last three months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oxfordlead
- Wellcome Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Riccardo De Giorgi
Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
Related Publications (21)
Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Blumenthal R, Danesh J, Smith GD, DeMets D, Evans S, Law M, MacMahon S, Martin S, Neal B, Poulter N, Preiss D, Ridker P, Roberts I, Rodgers A, Sandercock P, Schulz K, Sever P, Simes J, Smeeth L, Wald N, Yusuf S, Peto R. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2532-2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
PMID: 27616593BACKGROUNDCooper CM, et al. Psychological Medicine 2017; Page 1 of 10. doi:10.1017/S00332917170023792017
BACKGROUNDCowen PJ, Browning M. What has serotonin to do with depression? World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):158-60. doi: 10.1002/wps.20229. No abstract available.
PMID: 26043325BACKGROUNDFelger JC, Treadway MT. Inflammation Effects on Motivation and Motor Activity: Role of Dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Jan;42(1):216-241. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.143. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PMID: 27480574BACKGROUNDHarmer CJ, Shelley NC, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. Increased positive versus negative affective perception and memory in healthy volunteers following selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1256-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1256.
PMID: 15229059BACKGROUNDHarmer CJ, Duman RS, Cowen PJ. How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 May;4(5):409-418. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30015-9. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PMID: 28153641BACKGROUNDJain MK, Ridker PM. Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Dec;4(12):977-87. doi: 10.1038/nrd1901.
PMID: 16341063BACKGROUNDJha MK, Trivedi MH. Personalized Antidepressant Selection and Pathway to Novel Treatments: Clinical Utility of Targeting Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 12;19(1):233. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010233.
PMID: 29329256BACKGROUNDGBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X.
PMID: 27733283BACKGROUNDKilic FS, Ozatik Y, Kaygisiz B, Baydemir C, Erol K. Acute antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of simvastatin and its mechanisms in rats. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2012 Jan;17(1):39-43.
PMID: 22246008BACKGROUNDKohler-Forsberg O, Gasse C, Berk M, Ostergaard SD. Do Statins Have Antidepressant Effects? CNS Drugs. 2017 May;31(5):335-343. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0422-3.
PMID: 28303466BACKGROUNDLi H, Wang C, Zhang S, Sun S, Li R, Zou M, Cheng G. Safety Profile of Atorvastatin 80 mg: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Controlled Trials in 21,910 Participants. Drug Saf. 2016 May;39(5):409-19. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0394-0.
PMID: 26860922BACKGROUNDMacin SM, Perna ER, Farias EF, Franciosi V, Cialzeta JR, Brizuela M, Medina F, Tajer C, Doval H, Badaracco R. Atorvastatin has an important acute anti-inflammatory effect in patients with acute coronary syndrome: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J. 2005 Mar;149(3):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.041.
PMID: 15864233BACKGROUNDMcCabe C, Mishor Z, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
PMID: 20034615BACKGROUNDMiller AH, Haroon E, Felger JC. Therapeutic Implications of Brain-Immune Interactions: Treatment in Translation. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Jan;42(1):334-359. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.167. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PMID: 27555382BACKGROUNDNICE. NICE Clinical Guidelines 2014; 181:11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK268908
BACKGROUNDParsaik AK, Singh B, Murad MH, Singh K, Mascarenhas SS, Williams MD, Lapid MI, Richardson JW, West CP, Rummans TA. Statins use and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014 May;160:62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.026. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
PMID: 24370264BACKGROUNDPenn E, Tracy DK. The drugs don't work? antidepressants and the current and future pharmacological management of depression. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;2(5):179-88. doi: 10.1177/2045125312445469.
PMID: 23983973BACKGROUNDRoiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. CNS Spectr. 2013 Jun;18(3):139-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000072. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
PMID: 23481353BACKGROUNDWalsh AEL, Huneke NTM, Brown R, Browning M, Cowen P, Harmer CJ. A Dissociation of the Acute Effects of Bupropion on Positive Emotional Processing and Reward Processing in Healthy Volunteers. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 16;9:482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00482. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30386259BACKGROUNDSalagre E, Fernandes BS, Dodd S, Brownstein DJ, Berk M. Statins for the treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
PMID: 27148902BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philip J Cowen, MBBS, MD, FRPsych
University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The atorvastatin drug and the placebo will be encapsulated in identical capsules. Participants will not be aware of the treatment that they will be receiving; neither will the researcher. Allocation of treatments will be recorded on a Randomisation List, which will be updated when each new participant enters the randomised phase. The list will be held by a scientist uninvolved in the study.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2019
First Posted
May 29, 2019
Study Start
June 19, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the new Data Protection Act, personal data will be deleted as soon as possible after it is no longer needed for the study. Screening information: For volunteers who do not wish to be contacted for future studies, screening information (including contact details) will be stored for up to one year of completing study analyses, and then destroyed by shredding. Contact details may be retained after the end of the study for participants who have agreed to be contacted for future studies. Consent forms: Consent forms will be kept for 10 years after the end of the study, and then destroyed by shredding.