NCT03966859

Brief Summary

Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action. The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of atorvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that atorvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2019

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 19, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 1, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AtorvastatinEmotional processingReward processingInflammation (C-Reactive Protein)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Accuracy and reaction times during facial expression recognition task

    Faces representing varying degrees \[from "neutral" (0%) to "full prototypical emotion" (100%) of basic emotions (happiness, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise)\] are displayed on the screen and participants are asked to quickly and correctly classify them. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

  • Accuracy and reaction times during faces dot-probe task

    Faces acting as positive or negative emotional stimuli (happy or fearful facial expressions) are presented together with a matched neutral face. One is presented above and one below a central fixation point. Subsequently, a probe appears behind one of the two faces and participants are asked to quickly indicate the position of the probe. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

  • Accuracy and reaction times during emotional categorisation task

    Words describing positive and negative personality characteristics are presented, and participants are asked to quickly indicate whether they would like or dislike being described with the presented word. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

  • Accuracy during emotional recall task

    After a delay from the Emotional categorisation task, participants are asked to recall and write down as many words as possible from it. Accuracy in recall of positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

  • Accuracy and reaction times during emotional recognition memory task

    The original personality descriptors in the Emotional categorisation task, plus an equal number of matched distractor words, are presented, and participants are asked to indicate whether they recognise it from the Emotional categorisation task. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy and reaction times during reward processing

    Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo

  • Changes in C-Reactive Protein levels

    A blood sample will be drawn on the day of randomisation and on the day of the research visit (i.e. after the seventh day on atorvastatin or placebo)

Study Arms (2)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will receive lactose placebo tablets, encapsulated in opaque capsules, and will be asked to take one capsule daily for seven days at night-time, by mouth

Other: Lactose placebo

Atorvastatin

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive 20mg atorvastatin tablets, encapsulated in opaque capsules, and will be asked to take one capsule daily for seven days at night-time, by mouth

Drug: Atorvastatin 20mg

Interventions

oral dose, once daily for 7 days

Also known as: Lipitor, Atorva
Atorvastatin

oral dose, once daily for 7 days

Also known as: placebo
Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female
  • Aged 18-50 years
  • Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks
  • Body Mass Index in the range of 18-30
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Not currently taking any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
  • History or current significant psychiatric illness
  • Current alcohol or substance misuse disorder
  • History or current significant hepatic disease
  • History or current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drug (i.e. atorvastatin)
  • Pregnant, breast feeding, women of child-bearing potential not using appropriate contraceptive measures
  • Participation in a study that uses the same or similar computer tasks as those used in the present study
  • Participation in a study that involves the use of a medication within the last three months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Riccardo De Giorgi

Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Blumenthal R, Danesh J, Smith GD, DeMets D, Evans S, Law M, MacMahon S, Martin S, Neal B, Poulter N, Preiss D, Ridker P, Roberts I, Rodgers A, Sandercock P, Schulz K, Sever P, Simes J, Smeeth L, Wald N, Yusuf S, Peto R. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2532-2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

    PMID: 27616593BACKGROUND
  • Cooper CM, et al. Psychological Medicine 2017; Page 1 of 10. doi:10.1017/S00332917170023792017

    BACKGROUND
  • Cowen PJ, Browning M. What has serotonin to do with depression? World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):158-60. doi: 10.1002/wps.20229. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26043325BACKGROUND
  • Felger JC, Treadway MT. Inflammation Effects on Motivation and Motor Activity: Role of Dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Jan;42(1):216-241. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.143. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

    PMID: 27480574BACKGROUND
  • Harmer CJ, Shelley NC, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. Increased positive versus negative affective perception and memory in healthy volunteers following selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1256-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1256.

    PMID: 15229059BACKGROUND
  • Harmer CJ, Duman RS, Cowen PJ. How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 May;4(5):409-418. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30015-9. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

    PMID: 28153641BACKGROUND
  • Jain MK, Ridker PM. Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Dec;4(12):977-87. doi: 10.1038/nrd1901.

    PMID: 16341063BACKGROUND
  • Jha MK, Trivedi MH. Personalized Antidepressant Selection and Pathway to Novel Treatments: Clinical Utility of Targeting Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 12;19(1):233. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010233.

    PMID: 29329256BACKGROUND
  • GBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X.

    PMID: 27733283BACKGROUND
  • Kilic FS, Ozatik Y, Kaygisiz B, Baydemir C, Erol K. Acute antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of simvastatin and its mechanisms in rats. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2012 Jan;17(1):39-43.

    PMID: 22246008BACKGROUND
  • Kohler-Forsberg O, Gasse C, Berk M, Ostergaard SD. Do Statins Have Antidepressant Effects? CNS Drugs. 2017 May;31(5):335-343. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0422-3.

    PMID: 28303466BACKGROUND
  • Li H, Wang C, Zhang S, Sun S, Li R, Zou M, Cheng G. Safety Profile of Atorvastatin 80 mg: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Controlled Trials in 21,910 Participants. Drug Saf. 2016 May;39(5):409-19. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0394-0.

    PMID: 26860922BACKGROUND
  • Macin SM, Perna ER, Farias EF, Franciosi V, Cialzeta JR, Brizuela M, Medina F, Tajer C, Doval H, Badaracco R. Atorvastatin has an important acute anti-inflammatory effect in patients with acute coronary syndrome: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J. 2005 Mar;149(3):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.041.

    PMID: 15864233BACKGROUND
  • McCabe C, Mishor Z, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

    PMID: 20034615BACKGROUND
  • Miller AH, Haroon E, Felger JC. Therapeutic Implications of Brain-Immune Interactions: Treatment in Translation. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Jan;42(1):334-359. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.167. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

    PMID: 27555382BACKGROUND
  • NICE. NICE Clinical Guidelines 2014; 181:11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK268908

    BACKGROUND
  • Parsaik AK, Singh B, Murad MH, Singh K, Mascarenhas SS, Williams MD, Lapid MI, Richardson JW, West CP, Rummans TA. Statins use and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014 May;160:62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.026. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

    PMID: 24370264BACKGROUND
  • Penn E, Tracy DK. The drugs don't work? antidepressants and the current and future pharmacological management of depression. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;2(5):179-88. doi: 10.1177/2045125312445469.

    PMID: 23983973BACKGROUND
  • Roiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. CNS Spectr. 2013 Jun;18(3):139-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000072. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

    PMID: 23481353BACKGROUND
  • Walsh AEL, Huneke NTM, Brown R, Browning M, Cowen P, Harmer CJ. A Dissociation of the Acute Effects of Bupropion on Positive Emotional Processing and Reward Processing in Healthy Volunteers. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 16;9:482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00482. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30386259BACKGROUND
  • Salagre E, Fernandes BS, Dodd S, Brownstein DJ, Berk M. Statins for the treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

    PMID: 27148902BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Inflammation

Interventions

Atorvastatin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsHeptanoic AcidsFatty AcidsLipids

Study Officials

  • Philip J Cowen, MBBS, MD, FRPsych

    University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The atorvastatin drug and the placebo will be encapsulated in identical capsules. Participants will not be aware of the treatment that they will be receiving; neither will the researcher. Allocation of treatments will be recorded on a Randomisation List, which will be updated when each new participant enters the randomised phase. The list will be held by a scientist uninvolved in the study.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomised, in a double-blind fashion, to either placebo or atorvastatin. The randomisation code will be drawn up by a researcher not involved in the study using an online randomisation tool (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2019

First Posted

May 29, 2019

Study Start

June 19, 2019

Primary Completion

February 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 1, 2020

Last Updated

December 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the new Data Protection Act, personal data will be deleted as soon as possible after it is no longer needed for the study. Screening information: For volunteers who do not wish to be contacted for future studies, screening information (including contact details) will be stored for up to one year of completing study analyses, and then destroyed by shredding. Contact details may be retained after the end of the study for participants who have agreed to be contacted for future studies. Consent forms: Consent forms will be kept for 10 years after the end of the study, and then destroyed by shredding.

Locations