NCT04105244

Brief Summary

Parent caregivers of children with chronic conditions who require life-saving technology such as mechanical ventilation or feeding tubes must maintain a high level of vigilance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They usually provide a majority of their children's care and are often overwhelmed by the caregiving demands thus neglect health promotion behaviors that result in a deterioration of their own mental and physical health. The goal of this study is to test a cognitive-behavioral resourcefulness intervention that will improve these caregivers' mental and physical health and health promotion behaviors while they continue to provide vital care for these vulnerable children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
202

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 8, 2019

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2019

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 21, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 21, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 6, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2019

Results QC Date

March 25, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Mental HealthPhysical HealthTechnology-Dependent Children

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Psychological Outcome- Health Related Quality of Life

    Mental Health Related Quality of Life (The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System \[PROMIS\] Short Form version 1.2- Global Health). Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50. Global Mental Health (GMH) score converted to a T-Score metric - produces a physical and a mental health score. 10 points on the T-score metric is one standard deviation (SD). PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured or better mental health.

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

  • Depressive Cognitions

    Screening Measure for Early Detection of Depressive Symptoms: The Depressive Cognition Scale. Measures depressive cognitions and negative thoughts that may lead to clinical depression. Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 0 - 40. Higher scores indicating more depressive cognitions.

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

  • Physical Outcome

    (The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System \[PROMIS\] Short Form version 1.2- Global Health). Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50. Global Physical Health (GPH) score converted to a T-Score metric - produces a physical health score. 10 points on the T-score metric is one standard deviation (SD). PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. Higher T-score means better physical health.

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

  • Self-Management- Sleep- Subjective

    Appraised Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a l-month time interval. Nineteen (19) items are grouped into seven component scores, each weighted equally on a 0-3 scale. Score Range (Global PSQI Score) is 0-21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Sub Scales are summed

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

  • Positive Health Practices

    Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire- Positive Health Practices Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire (PLQ). Measures the positive health practices of exercise, substance use, nutrition, relaxation, safety, and health promotion. Twenty-four (24) items 4-point summated rating scale with a range of possible scores from 24 to 96 Higher scores reflect the practice of more health behaviors. Total scores are reported.

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

  • Depressive Symptoms

    "Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form - Depressive Symptoms "Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form Version 1.0 - Depression 8a. Assess self-reported negative mood , views of self , social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement." Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 5 (Min)-40 (Max). Total Score is reported. The score is converted to a T-Score metric. 10 points on the T-score metric is one standard deviation (SD). PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept (depression) being measured thus a T-score of 60 is one standard deviation worse related to the concept of depression than average.

    Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Technology-Dependent Children With ER Visits

    Up to 9 months

  • Number of Technology-Dependent Children With Rehospitalizations

    Up to 9 months

Study Arms (2)

Attention Control

NO INTERVENTION

The Attention Control arm will receive weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks and at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment plus the current standard of care, whereby caregivers phone their healthcare providers when they have questions or concerns

Resourcefulness Training Intervention©

EXPERIMENTAL

The Resourcefulness Training© arm will receive (a) individually tailored instruction on personal and social resourcefulness skills via the Resourcefulness Video and intervention nurse, (b) journal-writing instruction to describe resourcefulness application, (c) access to the study website with videotape vignettes and Resourcefulness Video, and (d) boosters at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment that will include reinforcement of skills learned and additional journal writing.

Behavioral: Resourcefulness Training©

Interventions

The intervention includes self-help and help-seeking skills.

Resourcefulness Training Intervention©

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • parent primary caregiver (biological, adoptive, or foster mother, father, grandmother, or grandfather) for a technology-dependent child based on the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) classification criteria (Group 1, mechanical ventilators; Group 2, intravenous nutrition/medication; Group 3, respiratory or nutritional support);
  • at least 18 years of age;
  • able to speak and understand English;
  • the technology-dependent child must be age 17.2 years or younger and receive care in the home from his/her parent. For children with more than one type of technology, we will follow OTA guidelines for classification.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Parents of children with a cancer diagnosis due to the short term use of technology following initial diagnosis and treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Chronic ConditionsPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPersonal SatisfactionBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

A majority of our study recruitment, enrollment, and data collection occurred during the Pandemic (2020-2021) therefore the protocol was modified to comply with the lockdown public health measures and the IRB mandate. All components of the study were conducted virtually using an institutional review board (IRB) approved videochat platform, REDCap, telephone, and text beginning in June 2020.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Valerie Boebel Toly, PhD, RN, CPNP-PC, FAAN
Organization
Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University

Study Officials

  • Valerie A. Toly, PhD, RN

    Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Data collectors and participants will be blinded to group assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The proposed study is a longitudinal (9-month) randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which primary caregiver parents of technology-dependent children will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms: (1) The Attention Control arm and (2) The Resourcefulness Training(c) arm.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Nursing

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2019

First Posted

September 26, 2019

Study Start

July 8, 2019

Primary Completion

December 21, 2022

Study Completion

December 21, 2022

Last Updated

June 6, 2024

Results First Posted

June 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Resource Sharing Plan: We support the principles, responsibilities and oversight of data sharing as articulated in the Final NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data (http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html). Once all data are collected, the research team will work to establish a database for the purpose of implementation of these standards, but with an emphasis upon the safeguarding of patient privacy, maintaining scientific integrity, and ensuring database privacy and security. Our goals will be to support the NIH intent of promoting dissemination of research findings and reagents to benefit NIH researchers country-wide and to promote rapid dissemination of clinical research findings. The data will be shared once all Human Subject identifiers are removed and preliminary analyses have been completed and collaborative ventures will be explored with the other investigators.

Shared Documents
SAP, CSR
Time Frame
The data will be shared once all Human Subject identifiers are removed and preliminary analyses have been completed and collaborative ventures will be explored with the other investigators.
Access Criteria
Must enter into data use agreement with Case Western Reserve University and the investigators.

Locations