NCT04087395

Brief Summary

This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, within-subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective study to investigate whether RHA® 4 with New Anesthetic Agent is non-inferior to RHA® 4 (with lidocaine) in terms of injection site pain felt by the subject during injection. At screening, the Treating Investigator (TI) evaluated subjects' NLF severity (using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale; WSRS) to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessing aesthetic improvement. At Visit 1, RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent was administered in a random sequence (first or second injection) and side of the face (left or right) and RHA® 4 with lidocaine was administered to the other side. Study subjects and the TI injecting study devices were blinded. Immediately after injection of each side, subjects rated injection site pain experienced during injection using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Injection site pain in each side of the face was also assessed at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection. Safety evaluation consisted of AE assessments, a 30-day CTR (Common Treatment Response) diary and a follow-up call performed by the study site at 72 hours after injection. Subjects attended Visit 2 (30 days post-injection) where efficacy and safety assessments will be conducted. Subjects who present with an unresolved clinically significant device related AE at Visit 2 received the optional follow-up phone call no later than 30 days after Visit 2. If the clinically significant AE remained unresolved, the Investigator requested that the subject attended the optional in-clinic follow-up visit (i.e., Visit 3) within 5 working days. Follow-up of the clinically significant AE continued until the AE was resolved or the TI determines that additional follow-up was not necessary.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 12, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 30, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 9, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 2, 2019

Results QC Date

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Hyaluronic AcidAnestheticLidocaineNasolabial Folds

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Non-inferiority of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into Nasolabial Folds.

    Injection pain during injection will be based on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects immediately after injection of each nasolabial fold. VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain.

    Visit 1 - During Injection

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Difference Between RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Nasolabial Folds of Each Side of the Face.

    Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

  • Change in NLF WSRS Score Between Baseline and Day 30 as Assessed by the Treating Investigator

    Visit 1 - Baseline (pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

  • Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Nasolabial Folds Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (NLF-WSRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI

    Visit 1 (Baseline, pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

  • Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Nasolabial Folds Domain) Questionnaire. The FACE-Q Measures the Experience and Outcomes of Aesthetic Facial Procedures From the Patient's Perspective.

    Visit 1 (Baseline) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

  • Number of Subjects Scored Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)

    Visit 1 (just after receiving treatment) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

RHA®4 with new anesthetic agent

EXPERIMENTAL

Split-face injection of RHA®4 with new anesthetic agent in the nasolabial fold of one side of the face and RHA®4-Lidocaine in the nasolabial fold of opposite side of the face. Up to 3 mL injected per side.

Device: RHA®4 with new anesthetic agent

RHA®4-Lidocaine

EXPERIMENTAL

Split-face injection of RHA®4 with new anesthetic agent in the nasolabial fold of one side of the face and RHA®4-Lidocaine in the nasolabial fold of opposite side of the face. Up to 3 mL injected per side.

Device: RHA®4-Lidocaine

Interventions

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/g and 0.3% w/w of new anesthetic agent in a physiologic buffer.

RHA®4 with new anesthetic agent

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/g and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.

RHA®4-Lidocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative UPT at Visit 1 and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
  • Moderate to severe bilateral nasolabial folds (grade 3 or 4 on the five-point WSRS).
  • Nasolabial folds of the same WSRS grade on the left and right sides of the face.
  • Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
  • Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form, the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form, and if applicable the California Experimental Research Subject's Bill of Rights prior to any study-related procedures being performed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control.
  • Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any component of the study devices.
  • Use of a prohibited treatment/procedure within time periods defined in the protocol
  • Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, or history of anaphylactic shock.
  • History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject a poor candidate in the study.
  • History of connective tissue disease.
  • Malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) within the past 5 years.
  • History of skin cancer in the treatment area.
  • Clinically active disease or infection in the NLF area.
  • Medical or psychiatric conditions that may increase the risk associated with study participation or may interfere with the interpretation of study results or compliance of the subject and, in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation or unreliability.
  • Exposure to any other investigational drug/device within 90 days of entering the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

California

Beverly Hills, California, 90210, United States

Location

Florida

Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States

Location

Illinois

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Project Manager
Organization
TEOXANE SA

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Split-face design
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2019

First Posted

September 12, 2019

Study Start

October 30, 2019

Primary Completion

February 18, 2020

Study Completion

November 9, 2020

Last Updated

January 24, 2022

Results First Posted

June 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Locations