RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent - Perioral Rhytids
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, within-subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective study to investigate whether RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent is non-inferior to RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in terms of injection site pain felt by the subject during injection. At screening, the Treating Investigator (TI) evaluated subjects' perioral rhytid severity (using the Perioral Rhytid Severity Rating Scale; PR-SRS) to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessing aesthetic improvement. At Visit 1, RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent was administered in a random sequence (first or second injection) and side of the mouth (left or right) and RHA® Redensity with lidocaine was administered to the other side. Study subjects and the TI injecting study devices were blinded. Immediately after injection of an upper perioral quadrant, subjects rated the injection site pain experienced during injection using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Injection site pain in each side of the mouth was also assessed at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection of the upper quadrant. Safety evaluation consisted of AE assessments, a 30-day CTR (Common Treatment Response) diary and a follow-up call performed by the study site at 72 hours after injection. Subjects attended Visit 2 (30 days post-injection) where efficacy and safety assessments were conducted. Subjects who presented with an unresolved clinically significant device related AE at Visit 2 received a optional follow-up phone call no later than 30 days after Visit 2. If the clinically significant AE remained unresolved, the Investigator requested that the subject attended the optional in-clinic follow-up visit (i.e., Visit 3) within 5 working days. Follow-up of the clinically significant AE continued until the AE was resolved or the TI determines that additional follow-up was not necessary.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 16, 2021
CompletedJanuary 24, 2022
May 1, 2021
4 months
August 23, 2019
April 29, 2021
January 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper Perioral Rhytids.
Injection pain during injection was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects immediately after injection of each upper perioral quadrant. VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain
Visit 1 - During Injection
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Difference Between RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Each Side of the Mouth.
Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection
Change From Baseline of PR-SRS Score for RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Vs RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine for the Correction of Perioral Rhytids as Assessed by the Treating Investigator (TI)
Visit 1 (Baseline, pre-injection) - Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)
Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI
Visit 1 - Baseline (pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)
Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Perioral Rhytids Domain) Questionnaire.
Visit 1 (Baseline) and Visit 2 (Day 30)
Number of Subjects Scored Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)
Visit 1 (post-injection) and Visit 2 (Day 30)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent in the perioral rhytids on one side of the mouth and RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in the perioral rhytids in the other side of the mouth. Up to 3 mL injected per side.
RHA® Redensity with lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in the perioral rhytids on one side of the mouth and RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent in the perioral rhytids in the other side of the mouth. Up to 3 mL injected per side.
Interventions
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 15 mg/g and 0.3% w/w of new anesthetic agent in a physiologic buffer.
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 15 mg/g and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative UPT at Visit 1 and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
- Moderate to severe bilateral perioral rhytids (grade 2 or 3 on PR-SRS).
- Perioral rhytids of the same PR-SRS grade on the left and right sides of the mouth.
- Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
- Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form, the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form, and if applicable the California Experimental Research Subject's Bill of Rights prior to any study-related procedures being performed.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control.
- Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any component of the study devices.
- Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, or history of anaphylactic shock.
- Clinically significant active skin disease or infection in the perioral area within 6 months prior to study entry (TI discretion).
- History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject a poor candidate in the study.
- Malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) within the past 5 years.
- History or presence of condition or feature that may confound the interpretation of the results in the perioral region, for example, tattoo, significant facial hair, acne scaring, prior surgery in the area, potential for active disease or infection flare up such as herpes simplex.
- History of skin cancer in the treatment area.
- Elective, clinically significant facial procedures that may confound the interpretation of the results in the perioral region (TI discretion), prior to study enrollment.
- Clinically active disease or infection in the perioral area or mouth (e.g., dental abscess).
- \. Exposure to any other investigational drug/device within 90 days of entering the study.
- \. Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation or unreliability.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Teoxane SAlead
Study Sites (3)
California
Beverly Hills, California, 90120, United States
Florida
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States
Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kaufman-Janette J, Joseph JH, Dayan SH, Smith S, Eaton L, Maffert P. Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics. Dermatol Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1065-1070. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003541. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
PMID: 36129233DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- TEOXANE SA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2019
First Posted
August 28, 2019
Study Start
October 30, 2019
Primary Completion
February 24, 2020
Study Completion
November 9, 2020
Last Updated
January 24, 2022
Results First Posted
June 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05