An mTLIP Block for Analgesia Management After Lumbar Spinal Surgery.
A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfacial Plane Block and Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain management is an important issue following lumbar spinal surgery. Wound infiltration is a technique that a local anesthetic solution is infiltrated into the tissues around the surgical area. Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane (mTLIP) block was described by Ahiskalioglu et al. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the US-guided mTLIP block and wound infiltration following lumbar disc surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2019
CompletedMay 30, 2019
May 1, 2019
4 months
May 22, 2019
May 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid consumption by the patients at postoperative 24 hours period
Fentanyl using
Postoperative 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain scores
Postoperative 24 hours period
Study Arms (2)
Group T = TLIP block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter the induction of anesthesia and placement of the patient in a prone position, US-guided mTLIP block was performed via the lateral approach in group T. For postoperative analgesia, a dose of 1 g of paracetamol (IV) was administered routinely, every 8 h. All the patients received fentanyl via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The protocol was a 20 mcg bolus without an infusion dose, 20-min lockout time, and 4-h limit
Group W = Wound infiltration group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter the induction of anesthesia and placement of the patient in a prone position wound infiltration was performed in group W. For postoperative analgesia, a dose of 1 g of paracetamol (IV) was administered routinely, every 8 h. All the patients received fentanyl via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The protocol was a 20 mcg bolus without an infusion dose, 20-min lockout time, and 4-h limit
Interventions
In group T, the block was performed bilaterally under aseptic conditions using the US device with a high-frequency 12-MHz linear US probe. The probe was covered with a sterile sheath and placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe was moved forward in a lateral direction to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Using the in-plane technique, a 22-G, 50-mm block needle was inserted between the muscles in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip was placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 ml of saline was injected to confirm the accuracy of the injection site. A dose of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml) was then injected in each side (total 40 ml).
In group W, a dose of 0.5% bupivacaine (20 ml) was injected for wound infiltration into the surgery site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for lumbar discectomy/hemilaminectomy surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Bleeding diathesis
- Receiving anticoagulant treatment
- Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Patients who do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Alici HA. Ultrasound-guided lateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: Description of new modified technique. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Aug;40:62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.04.015. No abstract available.
PMID: 28625449BACKGROUNDAhiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM. Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):775-776. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 28243853BACKGROUNDGurbet A, Bekar A, Bilgin H, Korfali G, Yilmazlar S, Tercan M. Pre-emptive infiltration of levobupivacaine is superior to at-closure administration in lumbar laminectomy patients. Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1237-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0676-z. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
PMID: 18425538BACKGROUNDKjaergaard M, Moiniche S, Olsen KS. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics for post-operative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):282-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02629.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
PMID: 22260370BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor and participant were blinded to the study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2019
First Posted
May 30, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2019
Study Completion
April 30, 2019
Last Updated
May 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared