QLB vs ESPB for Lumbar Spinal Surgery
Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Plane Block for Pain Management After Lumbar Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a fascial plane block where local anesthetic is injected adjacent to the quadratus lumborum muscle to anesthetize the thoracolumbar nerves. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. It has been reported that ESPB provides lumbar analgesia at T10-12, L3. This study aims to compare US-guided ESPB and posterior QLB for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar disc herniation-laminectomy surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2025
CompletedAugust 8, 2025
August 1, 2025
7 months
June 13, 2024
August 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain scores (NRS-Numerical Rating Scala)
Difference in the NRS scores at postoperative 2 hours between the groups
Postoperative 2 hours period
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The use of rescue analgesia (number of participants) (frequency of rescue analgesia)
Postoperative 24 hours period
The use of rescue analgesia (rate of tramadol using) (total consumption)
Postoperative 24 hours period
Postoperative pain scores (NRS-Numerical Rating Scala)
Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
The incidence of adverse events
Postoperative 24 hours period
Study Arms (2)
Group QLB = QLB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPosterior QLB will be performed
Group ESPB = ESPB Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORLumbar ESPB will be performed
Interventions
The block procedure will be applied after the surgery and before extubation with patients in the prone position by using US (Vivid Q, GE Healthcare, US). Under aseptic conditions, the convex probe will be covered with a sterile sheath and a 22G, 80 mm block needle (Braun Stimuplex Ultra 360, Germany) will be used. After visualizing the quadratus lumborum muscle, the needle will be punctured and 5 ml of saline will be injected into the posterior border of the quadratus lumborum muscle between QLM and latissimus dorsi muscle.. After the block location is confirmed, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected. The same process will be applied to the opposite side (60 ml totally).
ESP block will be performed. Convex probe will be placed longitudinally 4 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle, 2 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 30 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for the block in each side (total 60 mL).
Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by a pain nurse blinded to the procedure. Tramodol will be performed for rescue analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for lumbar disc herniation-laminectomy surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- history of bleeding diathesis,
- receiving anticoagulant treatment,
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- patients who do not accept the procedure
- Change in surgical technique in the intraoperative period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Oh SK, Lim BG, Won YJ, Lee DK, Kim SS. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110647. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110647. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
PMID: 35030493BACKGROUNDQiu Y, Zhang TJ, Hua Z. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 1;13:1611-1619. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256205. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32669870BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Aydin ME, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Anesthetic Techniques: Focus on Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block. Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Sep 25;13:121-133. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S233274. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33061562BACKGROUNDCanikli Adiguzel S, Akyurt D, Bahadir Altun H, Ultan Ozgen G, Akdeniz S, Bayraktar B, Tulgar S, Yigit Y. Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block or Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block and Postoperative Analgesia after Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7217. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237217.
PMID: 38068268BACKGROUNDAlver S, Ciftci B, Celik EC, Sargolzaeimoghaddam M, Cetinkal A, Erdogan C, Ahiskalioglu A. Postoperative recovery scores and pain management: a comparison of modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and quadratus lumborum block for lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):118-125. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07812-3. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PMID: 37314577BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor and participant were blinded to the study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2024
First Posted
June 27, 2024
Study Start
August 6, 2024
Primary Completion
February 20, 2025
Study Completion
February 22, 2025
Last Updated
August 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared