the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Analgesic Effect of Adding Popliteal Plexus Block to Standard Saphenous Nerve Block in Patients Scheduled for Elective Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction : Randomized Observer Blind Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is traumatic and debilitating and is typically repaired using an arthroscopic technique performed as an outpatient surgical procedure. However, many patients complain that the postoperative pain is severe for the first 48 hours following the ACL reconstruction . Effective postoperative pain management is a critical component to recovery, effective rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. Following ACL reconstruction, psychological factors are predictive of outcomes, and pain levels are inversely associated with function and quality of life assessment. ACL reconstruction procedures may reflect the complexity innervation of the anatomical areas involved, which includes the femoral nerve and its infrapatellar and saphenous branches, the obturator nerve, as well as the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. Therefore, surgical variables, namely the location of surgical ports and the source of grafts used, and this creates challenge to anaesthesiologist to determine easy , safe and efficacious nerve block to be used in this setting . A recently described popliteal plexus block(PPB) is claimed to anesthetize articular branches from the posterior obturator nerve and tibial nerve. It was recently confirmed in a cadaver study that injection of 10 mL of dye into the distal end of the adductor canal spreads via the adductor hiatus to the popliteal fossa and stains the popliteal plexus (PP). A blockade of the popliteal plexus , has been claimed to produce an equivalent analgesic effect to sciatic nerve block after total knee arthroplasty without causing any motor weakness. The current study hypothesize that combined saphenous nerve block with popliteal plexus block will enhance post operative analgesia after ACL reconstruction with motor sparing of thigh and leg muscles. Thus, faster recovery and earlier post-operative physiotherapy. The objective of the current study is to evaluate analgesic effect of combined saphenous and popliteal plexus block as post -operative analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction operation compared to standard saphenous nerve block . Patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: the intervention group will receive popliteal plexus block and saphenous nerve block and the control group will receive the standard saphenous nerve block only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 9, 2020
November 1, 2020
2.1 years
January 20, 2019
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The duration of analgesia
the pain will be assisted based on the time needed for the first dose rescue analgesia
24 hours post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (30)
the cumulative opioid consumption
24 hours post operative
The intervals between opioid (morphine) doses
24 hours post-operative
the quality of analgesia based on visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest
4 hours post-operative
the quality of analgesia based on visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest
8 hours post-operativE
the quality of analgesia based on visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest
12 hours post-operative
- +25 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
the control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthis group will receive post-operative saphenous nerve block by 1mg/kg plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 0.05 mg.
the intervention group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthis group will receive popliteal plexus block by 1mg/kg plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 0.05 mg in addition to standard saphenous nerve block by 1mg/kg plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 0.05 mg.
Interventions
The skin is disinfected and the saphenous nerve is located via Ultrasound . the transducer is placed anteromedially, approximately at mid-thigh level "a high-frequency linear probe 5Y12 MHz prepared in a sterile fashion" (Phillips HD11) . The block needle (Stimuplex; Braun Medical, Bethlehem, Pa), is inserted in plane in a lateral-to-medial orientation and advanced toward the femoral artery .Once the needle tip is visualized anterior to the artery and after careful aspiration, 1-2 mL of local anesthetic is injected to confirm the proper injection site . When injection of local anesthetic does not appear to result in its spread around the femoral artery, additional needle repositions and injections may be necessary.
After doing saphenous nerve block , we will move distally with the artery in the adductor canal until it moves away from the sartorius muscle to enter adductor hiatus . here , we will inject L.A above artery and so , popliteal plexus block will be accomplished
15ml of plain bupivacaine 0.5% will be given in both blocks
0.05 mg epinephrine will be added to bupivacaine in both blocks to prolong their duration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I/II/III .
- Age \> 18 years.
- Body mass index of \<40 kg/m2 .
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal,
- Un-cooperative patients
- BMI\>40kg/m2 .
- Allergy to local anaesthetics.
- Anticoagulation or bleeding disorders.
- Pre-existing peripheral neuropathies.
- Inflammation or infection over injection site.
- Daily morphine consumption \> 40 mg.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fayoum university hospital
Al Fayyum, 63514, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Runge C, Moriggl B, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. The Spread of Ultrasound-Guided Injectate From the Adductor Canal to the Genicular Branch of the Posterior Obturator Nerve and the Popliteal Plexus: A Cadaveric Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):725-730. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000675.
PMID: 28937534BACKGROUNDRunge C, Bjorn S, Jensen JM, Nielsen ND, Vase M, Holm C, Bendtsen TF. The analgesic effect of a popliteal plexus blockade after total knee arthroplasty: A feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Sep;62(8):1127-1132. doi: 10.1111/aas.13145. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29797704BACKGROUNDSehmbi H, Brull R, Shah UJ, El-Boghdadly K, Nguyen D, Joshi GP, Abdallah FW. Evidence Basis for Regional Anesthesia in Ambulatory Arthroscopic Knee Surgery and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Adductor Canal Nerve Block-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):223-238. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002570.
PMID: 29064877BACKGROUNDManickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.
PMID: 19916251BACKGROUNDMahmoud A, Boules M, Botros J, Mostafa M, Ragab S, Alsaeid M. Analgesic Impact of a Popliteal Plexus Block to Standard Adductor Canal Block in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Blind Clinical Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 17;2021:1723471. doi: 10.1155/2021/1723471. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34956430DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hany MO Yassin, MD
faculty of medicine , fayoum university
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2019
First Posted
July 15, 2019
Study Start
September 5, 2019
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share