Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-nephrectomy Pain
Ultrasound Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy for Renal Malignancies: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute postoperative pain proper management is important not only for patient satisfaction but also for patient outcome. It may also predispose patients to chronic post-surgical pain .Open nephrectomy is still conducted, although the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery has increased recently. A flank approach with an eleventh rib partial resection.Several modalities have been implemented for acute postoperative pain control. Intravenous (IV) opioids is one of the earliest and most widely used method, it is insufficient only for managing postoperative pain in some patients with severe pain besides their side effects.ESPB is a relatively simple technique with easily identified sonographic landmarks. Additionally, the ESPB has the potential to provide both somatic and visceral sensory blockade.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ESPB in acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open nephrectomy in renal cancer patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2022
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.2 years
August 28, 2020
July 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
measurement of visual analogue score
it is a scoring system from 0 to 100 mm where 100 represents the worst pain and 0 indicates no pain
1 week
Study Arms (2)
patient controlled analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 patients will receive only postoperative IV PCA alone for postoperative analgesia.
Erector Spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 patients will receive continuous ESPB for postoperative analgesia.
Interventions
30 patients will receive PCA only for postoperative analgesia
30 patients will receive continuous ESPB for postoperative analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physical status ASA II.
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years.
- Body mass index (BMI): \> 20 kg/m2 and \< 40 kg/m2.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Known sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics.
- History of psychological disorders.
- Localized infection at the site of block.
- Coagulopathies with platelet count below 50,000 or an INR\>1.5.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Institute
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ehab H Gendy, MD
Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, intensive care and pain releif
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor of Anesthesia, intensive care and pain releif
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2020
First Posted
September 3, 2020
Study Start
March 3, 2020
Primary Completion
May 28, 2022
Study Completion
June 15, 2022
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
we can share IPD after journal accepting the manuscript