NCT03646630

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare between two regional analgesic techniques; caudal block and ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block as regard degree of pain relief, accuracy of block, effect on hemodynamic stability and incidence of complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 7, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

lower abdominal surgeriesquadratus lumborum blockcaudal block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time at which the first analgesia required

    in hours

    24 hours after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (23)

  • Pain assessment by the aid of FLACC score

    30 minutes after operation

  • Pain assessment by the aid of FLACC score

    1 hour after operation

  • Pain assessment by the aid of FLACC score

    2 hours after operation

  • Pain assessment by the aid of FLACC score

    4 hours after operation

  • Pain assessment by the aid of FLACC score

    6 hours after operation

  • +18 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Quadratus Lumborum Block (QL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be placed in the lateral position,The high-frequency linear probe will be placed on the lateral abdomen, slightly cephalic to the iliac crest. Once the QL muscle will be observed, the probe will be tilted slightly to the caudal direction, to show the largest slice of the QL muscle, to confirm its posterior aspect. A 22-G block needle (Stimuplex D, Braun, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, and Tokyo) will be inserted in-plane, \~1 cm ventral to the probe. The needle tip will be advanced until it penetrates the posterior fascia of the QL muscle. A small amount of saline will be injected to confirm the correct position of the tip, between the QL muscle and the erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles (Posterior or QL block type 2), then a bolus of 0.5 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected.

Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum Block

Caudal block (C)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After induction of general anesthesia, a lateral position is obtained with the upper hip flexed 90⁰ and the lower one only 45⁰. A line is drawn to connect the posterior superior iliac spines bilaterally and used as one side of an equilateral triangle; then the location of the sacral hiatus should be approximated. By palpating the sacral cornua as 2 bony prominences, the sacral hiatus could be identified as a dimple in between. A 22 gauge needle is inserted at 45 degrees to the sacrum and redirected if the posterior surface of sacral bone is contacted. Children will receive caudal block with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%.

Procedure: Caudal Block

Interventions

Posterior or QL block type 2 , a bolus of 0.5 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25%

Quadratus Lumborum Block (QL)
Caudal BlockPROCEDURE

caudal block with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%.

Caudal block (C)

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 1-7 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II
  • Lower abdominal surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • History of developmental delay or mental retardation
  • Parent refusal
  • History of allergic reactions to local anesthetics
  • Rash or infection at the injection site
  • Anatomical abnormality
  • Bleeding disorders.
  • History of cardiac, neurological, renal, hepatic diseases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fayoum University hospital

El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):62-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.1.62. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11460814BACKGROUND
  • Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):507-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x. Epub 2012 May 27.

    PMID: 22630613BACKGROUND
  • Chakraborty A, Goswami J, Patro V. Ultrasound-guided continuous quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in a pediatric patient. A A Case Rep. 2015 Feb 1;4(3):34-6. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000090.

    PMID: 25642956BACKGROUND
  • Liu SS, Ngeow J, John RS. Evidence basis for ultrasound-guided block characteristics: onset, quality, and duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d266f0.

    PMID: 20216022BACKGROUND
  • Griffin J, Nicholls B. Ultrasound in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65 Suppl 1:1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06200.x.

    PMID: 20377542BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Kareem M Nawwar, MD

    Kasr ElAini Hospital, Faculty Of Medicine, Cairo Univerisity

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Lecturer of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2018

First Posted

August 24, 2018

Study Start

May 2, 2019

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

October 15, 2020

Last Updated

September 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations