Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section
Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The aim of work is to assess and compare the analgesic efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block with that of bilateral transversus abdominis plane block after elective cesarean section.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
6 months
July 8, 2019
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
duration of analgesia of the two blocks
time
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Visual analogue scale
immediatiy in pacu
Visual analogue scale
4 hours
Visual analogue scale
8 hours
Visual analogue scale
12 hours
Visual analogue scale
24 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ES Erector Spinae Plane Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORbilateral ESP block at the level of T9 by a linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips Saronno Italy) placed vertically 3cm lateral to the midline to visualize the back muscles superior to the transverse process. A 22-G short bevel needle (spinocan, B.Braun, melsungen AG, Germany) will be inserted in cranial-caudal direction until it make contact with the transverse process. Confirmation of the correct position of the tip of the needle is by injection of 1 ml saline causing hydrodisscetion between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After careful aspiration to exclude vascular puncture, 20 ml 0.25 % bupivacaine is injected.The same procedure is done on the other side of the back.
TAP Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORbilateral TAP block: while the patient in the supine position, a linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips Saronno Italy) is placed transversally on the anterolateral abdominal wall in the midaxillary line between the iliac crest and the costal margin identifying external oblique, internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. The TAP is between internal oblique and transversus abdominis. A 22-G needle (spinocan, B.Braun, melsungen AG, Germany) is introduced anteriorly to the transducer and advanced to reach the TAP between internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle. After careful aspiration to exclude vascular puncture, 20 ml 0.25 % bupivacaine is injected causing an elliptical separation of the two muscles. The same procedure is done on the other side.
Interventions
bilateral TAP block: while the patient in the supine position, a linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips Saronno Italy) is placed transversally on the anterolateral abdominal wall in the midaxillary line between the iliac crest and the costal margin identifying external oblique, internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. The TAP is between internal oblique and transversus abdominis. A 22-G needle (spinocan, B.Braun, melsungen AG, Germany) is introduced anteriorly to the transducer and advanced to reach the TAP between internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle. After careful aspiration to exclude vascular puncture, 20 ml 0.5 % bupivacaine is injected causing an elliptical separation of the two muscles. The same procedure is done on the other side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18 - 40 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ІІ, scheduled for elective cesarean section via a low transverse abdominal incision (Pfannenstiel) and receiving intrathecal anesthesia without sedation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal.
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia.
- Known allergy to the study drugs.
- Severe cardiovascular, renal or hepatic diseases.
- Bleeding disorders.
- Local infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Faculty of Medicine
Al Fayyum, 63511, Egypt
Mohamed Hamed
Al Fayyum, 63511, Egypt
Mohamed
Al Fayyum, 65345, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Ueshima H, Otake H. Similarities Between the Retrolaminar and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):123-124. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000526. No abstract available.
PMID: 27997492BACKGROUNDLeung AY. Postoperative pain management in obstetric anesthesia--new challenges and solutions. J Clin Anesth. 2004 Feb;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.02.012.
PMID: 14984863RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blind
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesia lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2019
First Posted
July 11, 2019
Study Start
July 8, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share