The Goal of This Study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgeries
Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim of the work To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Hypothesis
- Null hypothesis: The investigators suppose that ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block has no post-operative analgesic effect in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
- Alternative hypothesis: The investigators suppose that ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block has post-operative analgesic effect in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Study objectives Primary Objective: Comparison of opioid consumption in patients receiving erector spinae plane block in relation to control group. Secondary Objective:
- Evaluate the hemodynamics (blood pressure, heart rate) and respiratory rate in patients receiving erector spinae plane block during postoperative period at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12,24 hours.
- Assessment of numeric rating scale (NRS) in patients receiving erector spinae plane block during rest and movement during postoperative period at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12,24 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Jun 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 4, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 months
May 6, 2020
September 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid consumption
Meperidine consumptions for both group will be recorded
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae plane block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORErector spinae plane block will be administrated to this group. An intravenous patient controlled analgesia device will be given to the patients postoperatively.
Control group
SHAM COMPARATORAn intravenous patient controlled analgesia device will be given to the patients postoperatively
Interventions
The transducer was placed vertically 3cm lateral to the midline to visualize the muscles of the back, transverse process and the pleura in between the two transverse processes. Bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine each using an in-plane, cranial-to-caudad approach to contact the bony shadow of the transverse process (TP) with the tip deep to the fascial plane of the erector spinae muscle. The correct location of the needle tip was confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 cc of normal saline 0.9% and observing linear fluid spread lifting the erector spinae muscle off the tip of the TP.
Intravenous meperidine patient controlled analgesia device will be given to the patients postoperatively and 24 hour meperidine consumption will be recorded
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 21 - 60 years
- Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery:
- The indication for operation may be for benign or malignant disease.
- Major surgery is defined as an operation of anticipated duration of more than one hour.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of bleeding diathesis or on anticoagulant.
- Patients with relevant drug allergy.
- Patients with psychiatric illnesses, opioid dependence; alcohol or drug abuse that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain were excluded from the study.
- Compensated or decompensated myocardial insufficiency.
- Decreased renal function (serum creatinine \<2.0 mg/dL).
- Infection of the skin at the site of needle puncture area
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suez Canal Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University
Ismailia, 41522, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.
PMID: 28252539BACKGROUNDChin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000581.
PMID: 28272292BACKGROUNDRozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008 May;21(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/ca.20621.
PMID: 18428988BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PMID: 29913392BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bassem M EL-Ayashy, Master Degree
Suez Canal University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Emad EL-Deen A Ibrahim, Doctor of Medicine
Suez Canal University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hamdy A Hendawy, Doctor of Medicine
Suez Canal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2020
First Posted
May 11, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share