Enhancing Patient Recall in Urogynecologic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patient counseling is an essential part of any new treatment implementation. This process becomes even more important when it involves surgical counseling. This is when the patient and the surgeon discuss the possible surgical options and ideally establish a plan for the appropriate surgical intervention. Unfortunately, multiple studies have shown that patients tend to have poor recall of the key elements discussed during the consultation (1-3). In the investigators' experience, the concern lies specifically in the level of recall that patients have regarding their planned surgical procedure, as most patients cannot correctly state the planned intervention despite extensive counseling and explanation. Lack of knowledge about the type of surgery can have serious implications for the patient in the future. For example, knowing facts like the presence or absence of the cervix and whether future pap smears are needed or the presence of an implant, such as a mesh are necessary for the patient's well-being and proper medical care down the line, especially when the patient has multiple medical providers. In addition, previous research has demonstrated that low-quality counseling and the feeling of being "unprepared for surgery" directly correlate with patient dissatisfaction (4). This is especially relevant in the field of female pelvic reconstructive surgery, where the success of surgical interventions relies heavily upon subjective patient-reported outcomes (5). There have been many studies to augment the counseling process using supplemental materials. These have included use of multiple visual charts, anatomical models, and passive and interactive audiovisual aids (6). Some improvement in the outcomes has been observed in various fields of medicine with the dissemination of supplemental patient resources (7-10). However, in urogynecology, the effectiveness of surgical counseling sessions has not been achieved despite the different additional methods for patient education (6, 11). Reasons that urogynecologic supplemental materials have not seen the same level of success as those in other fields of medicine include the complexity of the surgeries and the language used in many of these educational aids (12). The investigators aim to address the problem of poor patient recall of their procedure by providing them with an easy-to-read patient card detailing the anticipated surgery at the time of their consult.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
9 months
July 3, 2019
February 13, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient recall of the anticipated surgery during the preoperative visit
All patient present for a preoperative visit, which occurs within 30 days of the scheduled surgery. At this time, all patients will receive a questionnaire testing their knowledge about their upcoming surgery. We will compare the answers from patients who received the education card and those who did not at the time of their surgical counseling visit. The name of the questionnaire is "The 7-Question Knowledge Questionnaire," which was developed by the Urogynecology Department at Atlantic Health System. The scale consists of 7 questions and will have score ranges between from 0 to 7.
Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days prior to their scheduled surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient recall of the surgery during the postoperative visit
Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days of their surgery.
Patient satisfaction
Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days of their surgery.
Study Arms (2)
Patient education card
EXPERIMENTALControl
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Patient who are randomized to receive a patient card at the end of the counseling visit will be able to take an index-card sized card with them which will highlight their anticipated surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking females, ages \>18 and \<90 years, present for surgical planning for reconstructive urogynecologic procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia, blindness, non-English speakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Atlantic Urogynecology Associates
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chernyak S, Caraballo R, Chiu S, Salamon C. Improving Patient Recall of Planned Intervention After Surgical Counseling: The IRIS Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 May 1;28(5):280-286. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001102. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
PMID: 34534196DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charbel Salamon, MD, MS
Atlantic Health System
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI/Medical Director of Urogynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2019
First Posted
July 8, 2019
Study Start
November 14, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share