NCT04010292

Brief Summary

Patient counseling is an essential part of any new treatment implementation. This process becomes even more important when it involves surgical counseling. This is when the patient and the surgeon discuss the possible surgical options and ideally establish a plan for the appropriate surgical intervention. Unfortunately, multiple studies have shown that patients tend to have poor recall of the key elements discussed during the consultation (1-3). In the investigators' experience, the concern lies specifically in the level of recall that patients have regarding their planned surgical procedure, as most patients cannot correctly state the planned intervention despite extensive counseling and explanation. Lack of knowledge about the type of surgery can have serious implications for the patient in the future. For example, knowing facts like the presence or absence of the cervix and whether future pap smears are needed or the presence of an implant, such as a mesh are necessary for the patient's well-being and proper medical care down the line, especially when the patient has multiple medical providers. In addition, previous research has demonstrated that low-quality counseling and the feeling of being "unprepared for surgery" directly correlate with patient dissatisfaction (4). This is especially relevant in the field of female pelvic reconstructive surgery, where the success of surgical interventions relies heavily upon subjective patient-reported outcomes (5). There have been many studies to augment the counseling process using supplemental materials. These have included use of multiple visual charts, anatomical models, and passive and interactive audiovisual aids (6). Some improvement in the outcomes has been observed in various fields of medicine with the dissemination of supplemental patient resources (7-10). However, in urogynecology, the effectiveness of surgical counseling sessions has not been achieved despite the different additional methods for patient education (6, 11). Reasons that urogynecologic supplemental materials have not seen the same level of success as those in other fields of medicine include the complexity of the surgeries and the language used in many of these educational aids (12). The investigators aim to address the problem of poor patient recall of their procedure by providing them with an easy-to-read patient card detailing the anticipated surgery at the time of their consult.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 14, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient recall of the anticipated surgery during the preoperative visit

    All patient present for a preoperative visit, which occurs within 30 days of the scheduled surgery. At this time, all patients will receive a questionnaire testing their knowledge about their upcoming surgery. We will compare the answers from patients who received the education card and those who did not at the time of their surgical counseling visit. The name of the questionnaire is "The 7-Question Knowledge Questionnaire," which was developed by the Urogynecology Department at Atlantic Health System. The scale consists of 7 questions and will have score ranges between from 0 to 7.

    Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days prior to their scheduled surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient recall of the surgery during the postoperative visit

    Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days of their surgery.

  • Patient satisfaction

    Patients will receive questionnaires within 30 days of their surgery.

Study Arms (2)

Patient education card

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Patient education card

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Patient who are randomized to receive a patient card at the end of the counseling visit will be able to take an index-card sized card with them which will highlight their anticipated surgery.

Patient education card

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 89 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English-speaking females, ages \>18 and \<90 years, present for surgical planning for reconstructive urogynecologic procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Dementia, blindness, non-English speakers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Atlantic Urogynecology Associates

Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Chernyak S, Caraballo R, Chiu S, Salamon C. Improving Patient Recall of Planned Intervention After Surgical Counseling: The IRIS Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 May 1;28(5):280-286. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001102. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Charbel Salamon, MD, MS

    Atlantic Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Charbel Salamon, MD, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PI/Medical Director of Urogynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2019

First Posted

July 8, 2019

Study Start

November 14, 2019

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 1, 2020

Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations