NCT02156687

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh versus the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Hypothesis: Suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh will be faster than when using the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 14, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2014

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 7, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 29, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 24, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2014

Results QC Date

July 8, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 10, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Suturing Time for Mesh Placement = Time From Insertion of Y Mesh or First Flat Mesh Arm Into Pelvis to Last Sacral Suture Placed

    one day intraoperative

  • Total OR Time = Operating Room Time of Entry and Exit

    one day intraoperative

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Post-operative Mean Difference POPDI at 24 Months

    24 months

  • Postoperative Mean Difference CRADI at 24 Months

    24 months

  • Postoperative Mean Difference UDI at 24 Months

    24 months

  • Postoperative Subjective Recurrence at 24 Months

    24 months

  • Postoperative Objective Recurrence at 24 Months

    24 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cololast, Inc. Restorell Y mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Y mesh

Device: Y mesh

Coloplast, Inc. Restorelle Dual flat mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dual flat mesh

Device: Dual flat mesh

Interventions

Y meshDEVICE

Y mesh

Also known as: Cololast, Inc. Restorell Y mesh
Cololast, Inc. Restorell Y mesh

Dual flat mesh

Also known as: Coloplast, Inc. Restorelle Dual flat mesh
Coloplast, Inc. Restorelle Dual flat mesh

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18, who are to undergo laparoscopic or robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Other concomitant laparoscopic or prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures (e.g., laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, cystocele repair, rectocele repair or mid-urethral sling procedures) will be performed at the primary surgeon's discretion.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to comprehend written and/or spoken English
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Medical illness precluding laparoscopy
  • Need for concomitant surgeries not related to pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence
  • Sacrocolpoperineopexy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

The biggest limitation in this study was lost to follow-up; however, this limitation was mitigated apriori by considering potential lost to follow-up in our power analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Cecile Ferrando, M.D.
Organization
Cleveland Clinic

Study Officials

  • Cecile Unger, M.D.

    The Cleveland Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2014

First Posted

June 5, 2014

Study Start

April 14, 2014

Primary Completion

November 7, 2019

Study Completion

April 1, 2020

Last Updated

November 24, 2020

Results First Posted

October 29, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations