NCT03977038

Brief Summary

According to the World Health Organization, MDD is attributed as the leading cause of disability worldwide, leaving 300 million individuals affected. Despite the efficacy of pharmacotherapy, a subset of MDD patients, classified as TRD, exhibit suboptimal response and thus require alternative treatment options such as rTMS. Emotional-laden "hot"and Neutral "cold" cognitions are shown to be dysfunctional in depression. Potential pro-cognitive effects remain inconclusive. In this study the investigators seek to investigate whether visual scanning patterns of emotionally laden images may be a biological marker and predictor of rTMS antidepressant efficacy. If so, then changes in visual scanning patterns are expected to precede clinical symptom improvement. Furthermore, changes in visual scanning patterns (which characterizes the state of hot cognition) are compared simultaneously to changes in cold cognition in order to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying rTMS-induced changes in cognition. It is hypothesized that participants who are responders to rTMS will exhibit a decrease in the amount of time spent looking at dysphoric images will precede clinically detectable changes in mood as measured by a reduction in the scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). The hypothesis for this study corresponds to the alleviation of the dysfunction within the hot cognitive system as a result of rTMS and a potential compensatory effect of cold cognition as a natural reaction of resetting the allocation of cognitive resources.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 23, 2019

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 6, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 6, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 23, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationHot CognitionCold CognitionAttentional ImagingEye trackingCognitive impairmentCognition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in cold cognition

    Also known as neutral or "non-emotional" cognition, it will be measured by the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) utilized in the domains of attention, executive function, memory and social/emotional cognition

    Participants will be tested once every two weeks for six weeks. To follow up on investigating lasting results, this cognitive battery will be conducted at follow-up at one-month mark (Week 10) from the last visit at Week 6

  • Change in hot cognition

    Also known as "emotional" cognition, it will be measured through attentional imaging by an eye tracking task where participants will view image slides presenting images of different valences (emotional, neutral) and the participant's eye gaze estimates will be recorded

    Participants will be tested once every two weeks for six weeks. To follow up on investigating lasting results, visual stimuli test will be conducted at one-month mark (Week 10) from the last visit at Week 6

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • depressive symptoms (physician-rated)

    TRD participants are assessed for their depressive symptom severity in response to rTMS treatment by the study psychiatrist every two weeks for six weeks, followed by a follow-up visit at one-month mark (Week 10).

  • depressive symptoms (self-report)

    TRD participants are asked to self-report their depressive symptom severity in response to rTMS treatment every two weeks for six weeks, followed by a follow-up visit at one-month mark (Week 10).

Study Arms (2)

TRD sample

Individuals in the treatment resistant depression (TRD) sample suffer from the condition called TRD. The intervention that will be administered to this group is the standardized rTMS treatment using High Frequency dTMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over L-DLPFC, at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% value of the individual's motor threshold, in 5 daily sessions per week, taking place each weekday, over the course of 6 weeks.

Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Healthy Controls (HC) sample

Individuals in the HC sample are age-, sex-, education-matched to the individuals in the TRD sample. HC sample does not receive any therapeutic treatment and are solely examined as a comparative measure of normal cognitive capabilities.

Interventions

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is prescribed as first-line treatment for TRD patients (4). rTMS is safe, tolerable and non-invasive neurostimulation procedure where powerful magnetic pulses are transmitted through the skull into the underlying cortical cortex with the aim of electrical current induction within the neural tissue. This study administers a standard dose of rTMS treatment to the TRD patient sample consisting of high frequency deep TMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% value of the individual's motor threshold, in 5 daily sessions per week, taking place each weekday, over the course of 6 weeks. The technology of dTMS, which will be used in this study, is an adaptation of the therapeutic intervention of rTMS with the advancement of possessing higher efficacy in targeting deeper brain regions of interest.

TRD sample

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Potential TRD participants in this study will be individuals referred by their family doctor or community psychiatrist for diagnostic clarification and/or the provision of treatment options for their mood symptoms. Additionally, individuals who respond to the study advertisement and based on the telephone screening performed by the study physicians, are deemed to meet the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria will be the provision of treatment options for their mood symptoms as well as the opportunity to participate in this study. Healthy Control participants will be age-,sex- and education- matched to the TRD participants and will be representative of the community sample, consisting of healthy individuals with no psychiatric illness.

You may qualify if:

  • For the patient group, subjects are required to meet DSM-5 criteria for a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder.
  • For the healthy control group, subjects should be matched to the patient group in domains of age, sex and education; as well as being devoid of any current or previous history of neuropsychiatric illness.
  • Patient group subjects must have a score of at least 20 on the HDRS-17 at time of assessment.
  • All subjects (patients and healthy controls) should be between the ages of 18 and 65.
  • All subjects (patients and healthy controls) must be capable of providing their informed written consent.
  • For the patient group, it is essential that subjects who are taking antidepressant medications maintain a stable dose of medication for at least 4 weeks prior to start of treatment and also continue maintaining this stability throughout the course of treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects suffering from unstable medical conditions
  • Subjects with current and past history of epilepsy
  • Recent history of substance abuse/dependence (excluding nicotine and caffeine) within the past 6 months as defined by DSM-5
  • History of suicide attempts or self-harm within the past 12 months
  • Current or previous diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders (including psychotic disorder due to general medical condition, substance-induced psychotic, psychotic disorder not otherwise specified) as defined by the MINI
  • Previous lack of response to rTMS
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within the 3 months prior to beginning of study
  • Inability to communicate in English language

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J, Modirrousta M, Patry S, Vila-Rodriguez F, Lam RW, MacQueen GM, Parikh SV, Ravindran AV; CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):561-75. doi: 10.1177/0706743716660033. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

    PMID: 27486154BACKGROUND
  • World Health Organization. Depression: Fact Sheet. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/. Updated February 2017.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gupta M, Holshausen K, Best MW, Jokic R, Milev R, Bernard T, Gou L, Bowie CR. Relationships among neurocognition, symptoms, and functioning in treatment-resistant depression. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 May;28(3):272-81. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act002. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

    PMID: 23343778BACKGROUND
  • Roiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. CNS Spectr. 2013 Jun;18(3):139-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000072. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

    PMID: 23481353BACKGROUND
  • Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.

    PMID: 17074942BACKGROUND
  • Harmer CJ, Shelley NC, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. Increased positive versus negative affective perception and memory in healthy volunteers following selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1256-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1256.

    PMID: 15229059BACKGROUND
  • Stange JP, Jenkins LM, Hamlat EJ, Bessette KL, DelDonno SR, Kling LR, Passarotti AM, Phan KL, Klumpp H, Ryan KA, Langenecker SA. Disrupted engagement of networks supporting hot and cold cognition in remitted major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

    PMID: 29100150BACKGROUND
  • Robinson OJ, Roiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. In: McIntyre, R.S. (Ed.), Cognitive Impairment in Major Depressive Disorder.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2016.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lantrip C, Gunning FM, Flashman L, Roth RM, Holtzheimer PE. Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Cognitive Control of Emotion: Potential Antidepressant Mechanisms. J ECT. 2017 Jun;33(2):73-80. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000386.

    PMID: 28072659BACKGROUND
  • Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates and enhances the clinical response to antidepressants in major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;74(2):e122-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07996.

    PMID: 23473357BACKGROUND
  • Serafini G, Pompili M, Belvederi Murri M, Respino M, Ghio L, Girardi P, Fitzgerald PB, Amore M. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive performance in treatment-resistant depression. A systematic review. Neuropsychobiology. 2015;71(3):125-39. doi: 10.1159/000381351. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

    PMID: 25925699BACKGROUND
  • Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Cambridge Cognition Ltd Website. https://www.cambridgecognition.com/cantab/

    BACKGROUND
  • Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK, Lanctot KL. A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):446-57. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.033. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

    PMID: 20015486BACKGROUND
  • Howren MB, Lamkin DM, Suls J. Associations of depression with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2009 Feb;71(2):171-86. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181907c1b. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

    PMID: 19188531BACKGROUND
  • Strawbridge R, Arnone D, Danese A, Papadopoulos A, Herane Vives A, Cleare AJ. Inflammation and clinical response to treatment in depression: A meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;25(10):1532-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

    PMID: 26169573BACKGROUND
  • Haroon E, Daguanno AW, Woolwine BJ, Goldsmith DR, Baer WM, Wommack EC, Felger JC, Miller AH. Antidepressant treatment resistance is associated with increased inflammatory markers in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Sep;95:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 19.

    PMID: 29800779BACKGROUND
  • Daniele A, Divella R, Paradiso A, Mattioli V, Romito F, Giotta F, Casamassima P, Quaranta M. Serotonin transporter polymorphism in major depressive disorder (MDD), psychiatric disorders, and in MDD in response to stressful life events: causes and treatment with antidepressant. In Vivo. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):895-901.

    PMID: 22021682BACKGROUND
  • Lee BH, Kim YK. The roles of BDNF in the pathophysiology of major depression and in antidepressant treatment. Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Dec;7(4):231-5. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.4.231. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

    PMID: 21253405BACKGROUND
  • Sharp R. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jun;65(4):340. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv043. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25972613BACKGROUND
  • Reilly TJ, MacGillivray SA, Reid IC, Cameron IM. Psychometric properties of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jan;60:132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

    PMID: 25300442BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Whole blood specimen will be retained from all participants at 4 time points in the study (Week 0 (baseline), Week 2, Week 6 (last visit) and Week 10 (follow-up)). Bloodwork is obtained in order to monitor for genotype of serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) , BDNF and potential alterations in the present levels of inflammatory markers of TNF-⍺ and IL-6 involved in the pathophysiological inflammation profile of depression.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantCognitive Dysfunction

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersCognition DisordersNeurocognitive Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Peter Giacobbe, MD, FRCPC

    Harquail Centre For Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Month
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Head, Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2019

First Posted

June 6, 2019

Study Start

May 30, 2020

Primary Completion

June 6, 2022

Study Completion

June 6, 2022

Last Updated

March 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Due to confidentiality, IPD will not be shared with other researchers

Locations