PET/MR Versus CECT Scans in Imaging Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer
Comparing Accuracy of PET/MR vs. CECT in Assessment of Peritoneal Disease for Resectability in Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial studies how well positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans work in locating ovarian cancer tumors in patients with known or suspected ovarian cancer. PET, MR, and CECT scans use different methods to create images of areas inside the body. This trial is being done to see if PET/MR scans may help doctors locate ovarian cancer tumors, predict how well these tumors may be removed during surgery, and predict how patients respond to platinum-based chemotherapies compared to standard of care CECT scans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
April 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
9 years
May 24, 2019
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lesion detection accuracy
Lesion detection accuracy will be summarized using frequencies and percentages by modality. McNemar's test will be used to compare accuracies between positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) and contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT). Other diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression model will be used to assess effect of patient and tumor characteristics on diagnostic accuracy.
Up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Diagnostic accuracy by location
Up to 3 years
Response status
Up to 3 years
Imaging and genomic data analysis
Up to 3 years
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (CECT, PET-MRI)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo standard of care CECT scan and PET-MRI scan over 90-120 minutes within 30 days before laparoscopy or cytoreduction. Patients who do not undergo cytoreduction based on diagnostic laparoscopy undergo additional PET-MRI and standard of care CECT scans after completion of chemotherapy and before cytoreduction.
Interventions
Undergo standard CECT
Undergo PET/MRI scan
Undergo PET/MRI scan
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ovarian cancer or highly suspected ovarian cancer who are eligible to undergo laparoscopic evaluation for resectability will be enrolled in the trial.
- Patients who have estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \> 30.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients allergic to gadolinium.
- Patients who have eGRF \< 30.
- Patients with cardiac pacers.
- Pediatric patients.
- Greater than 400 pounds in weight.
- Blood glucose (\> 200 mg/dl).
- Pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Priya R Bhosale
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2019
First Posted
May 29, 2019
Study Start
May 12, 2018
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04