The Efficacy of Cathodal tDCS in ADHD
The Efficacy of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children and Adolescents With Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of five sessions of cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC on inhibitory control/response inhibition in children and adolescents with ADHD. Investigators hypothesize that multiple sessions of cathodal tDCS will induce a greater and long-term effect on inhibitory response in children and adolescents with ADHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedAugust 6, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.5 years
November 16, 2017
August 4, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change of accuracy rate
Accuracy rate from go/no-go tasks
Change from baseline to Day 0 after tDCS (T1)
Change of accuracy rate
Accuracy rate from go/no-go tasks
Change from Day 0 to 1 week after tDCS (T2)
Change of accuracy rate
Accuracy rate from go/no-go tasks
Change form 1 week to 1 month after tDCS (T3)
Change in the amplitude of ERP recording
The amplitude of the ERP components (N2 and P3) in average will be use as outcome measures to evaluate response inhibition.
Change from baseline to Day 0 after tDCS (T1)
Change in the amplitude of ERP recording
The amplitude of the ERP components (N2 and P3) in average will be use as outcome measures to evaluate response inhibition.
Change from Day 0 to 1 week after tDCS (T2)
Change in the amplitude of ERP recording
The amplitude of the ERP components (N2 and P3) in average will be use as outcome measures to evaluate response inhibition.
Change form 1 week to 1 month after tDCS (T3)
Study Arms (2)
Active tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCathodal tDCS will be applied over the left DLPFC (F3) according to the 10-20 EEG electrode systems and the anode will be placed over the right supraorbital (Fp2), using rectangular saline-soaked sponge pads 35 cm2. The current intensity of 1.5 mA will be used for 15 mins for a session.
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORCathodal tDCS will be applied over the left DLPFC (F3) according to the 10-20 EEG electrode systems and the anode will be placed over the right supraorbital (Fp2), using rectangular saline-soaked sponge pads 35 cm2. The current intensity of 1.5 mA will flow continuously only 120 seconds. The electrode will be attached until the end of stimulation even the current flows only at the beginning.
Interventions
Five sessions (active/sham) will be held on five consecutive days. The parameter of electrode size, current strength and current duration were previously tested for safety in children
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children and adolescents aged 7 to 16 years with suspected ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th edition (DSM-5TM). Diagnostic confirmation will be performed by pediatric neurologist or psychologist.
- Right-handed
- Free of any neurological antecedent, unstable medical conditions such as epilepsy; although tDCS is believed to induce very less or no risk of seizure and epileptic seizure have never been reported in tDCS study even in a study with active epilepsy.
You may not qualify if:
- Be unable to understand the instruction
- No clear neurological antecedent history
- Presence of intracranial metal implantation, cochlea implant, or cardiac pacemaker
- Motor or perceptual handicap that would prevent using the computer program
- For patients who under medication, poor-adjusted to their medication, type and dosage of medication is changed less than 4 weeks prior to the start
- Subjects are participating in the other protocol or receiving alternative treatment such transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty ofPhysical Therapy, Mahidol University
Salaya, Nakonpathom, 73170, Thailand
Related Publications (1)
Klomjai W, Siripornpanich V, Aneksan B, Vimolratana O, Permpoonputtana K, Tretriluxana J, Thichanpiang P. Effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory and attention control in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A pilot randomized sham-controlled crossover study. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;150:130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.02.032. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
PMID: 35367657DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wanalee Klomjai, PhD
Mahidol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2017
First Posted
May 20, 2019
Study Start
December 15, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share