The Effects of Therapy Dogs on Child Biology and Behavior
A Pilot Study of the Effects of Interactions With Therapy Dogs on Child Stress Responsivity
2 other identifiers
interventional
188
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to apply a rigorous experimental design to test whether children's interactions with therapy dogs increase immediate prosocial behavior and reduce immediate biological response to stress.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2022
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
May 1, 2024
2.6 years
April 5, 2019
September 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Mean level and Change in Salivary cortisol
Salivary cortisol will be collected 7 times during the study visit.
Measured at baseline and over a 45 minute period before and after the psychosocial stress test
Mean level Prosocial behavior assessed with the Zurich prosocial game
During the study visit prosocial behavior is assessed through total number of helping behaviors recorded during the Zurich prosocial game.
Assessed after the 2nd intervention.
Mean level Behavioral carefulness assessed with the children's game, Operation
During the study visit, participants will play the game Operation. Behavioral carefulness metrics include number of errors and total time to complete the task.
Assessed after the 2nd intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mean level and Change in Psychological Well Being assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children (PANAS-C)
Measured at the beginning of the study visit and before and after each intervention.
Mean level and Change in galvanic skin response measured with the E4 wristband
Assessed during both interventions and during the psychosocial stress test.
Mean level and Change in heart rate measured with the E4 wristband
Assessed during both interventions and during the psychosocial stress test.
Other Outcomes (1)
Mean Level and Change in Salivary Oxytocin (pending additional funds)
Assessed immediately before and after each intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, children will interact with the therapy dog prior to the psychosocial stress task and with the stuffed toy dog prior to the prosocial behavior tests.
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, children will interact with the stuffed toy prior to the psychosocial stress task collection and with the therapy dog prior to the prosocial behavior tests.
Arm 3
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, children will watch a 5 minute puppy video prior to the psychosocial stress task collection and with the therapy dog prior to the prosocial behavior tests.
Interventions
Children will undergo a 5 minute unstructured session with either a certified therapy dog or with a dog who is trained and certified for animal-assisted interventions and/or animal-assisted activities. Children will be allowed to talk to, pet, and play with the therapy dog during the interaction.
Children will undergo a 5 minute unstructured session with a stuffed toy dog. Children will be allowed to talk to, pet, and play with the stuffed toy dog during the interaction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Children between the ages of 8-12 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Limited comprehension of English
- Severe neurological, medical, or psychiatric illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia, psychosis)
- Severe asthma or animal allergies
- Animal phobias
- Use of medications that affect cortisol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (50)
Merikangas KR, He JP, Brody D, Fisher PW, Bourdon K, Koretz DS. Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among US children in the 2001-2004 NHANES. Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):75-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2598. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
PMID: 20008426BACKGROUNDCostello EJ, Egger H, Angold A. 10-year research update review: the epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: I. Methods and public health burden. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;44(10):972-86. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000172552.41596.6f.
PMID: 16175102BACKGROUNDMerikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, Benjet C, Georgiades K, Swendsen J. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
PMID: 20855043BACKGROUNDLewinsohn PM, Zinbarg R, Seeley JR, Lewinsohn M, Sack WH. Lifetime comorbidity among anxiety disorders and between anxiety disorders and other mental disorders in adolescents. J Anxiety Disord. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(4):377-94. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(97)00017-0.
PMID: 9276783BACKGROUNDKessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Wittchen H -U. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):169-84. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1359. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
PMID: 22865617BACKGROUNDKiecolt-Glaser JK, McGuire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: new perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:83-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135217.
PMID: 11752480BACKGROUNDMiller GE, Chen E, Parker KJ. Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):959-97. doi: 10.1037/a0024768.
PMID: 21787044BACKGROUNDAdam EK, Kumari M. Assessing salivary cortisol in large-scale, epidemiological research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Nov;34(10):1423-36. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.06.011. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
PMID: 19647372BACKGROUNDSapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000 Feb;21(1):55-89. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389.
PMID: 10696570BACKGROUNDMcEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 May 1;840:33-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x.
PMID: 9629234BACKGROUNDGunnar MR, Quevedo KM. Early care experiences and HPA axis regulation in children: a mechanism for later trauma vulnerability. Prog Brain Res. 2008;167:137-49. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)67010-1.
PMID: 18037012BACKGROUNDMiller GE, Chen E, Zhou ES. If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in humans. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):25-45. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.25.
PMID: 17201569BACKGROUNDKlein ZA, Romeo RD. Changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress responsiveness before and after puberty in rats. Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23465865BACKGROUNDLightman SL. The neuroendocrinology of stress: a never ending story. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008 Jun;20(6):880-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01711.x.
PMID: 18601712BACKGROUNDCostello EJ, He JP, Sampson NA, Kessler RC, Merikangas KR. Services for adolescents with psychiatric disorders: 12-month data from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):359-66. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100518.
PMID: 24233052BACKGROUNDSobo EJ, Eng B, Kassity-Krich N. Canine visitation (pet) therapy: pilot data on decreases in child pain perception. J Holist Nurs. 2006 Mar;24(1):51-7. doi: 10.1177/0898010105280112.
PMID: 16449747BACKGROUNDBraun C, Stangler T, Narveson J, Pettingell S. Animal-assisted therapy as a pain relief intervention for children. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009 May;15(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
PMID: 19341990BACKGROUNDCrossman MK. Effects of Interactions With Animals On Human Psychological Distress. J Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul;73(7):761-784. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22410. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 27809353BACKGROUNDCohen SP. Can pets function as family members? West J Nurs Res. 2002 Oct;24(6):621-38. doi: 10.1177/019394502320555386.
PMID: 12365764BACKGROUNDAllen KM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Kelsey RM. Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Oct;61(4):582-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.582.
PMID: 1960650BACKGROUNDPolheber JP, Matchock RL. The presence of a dog attenuates cortisol and heart rate in the Trier Social Stress Test compared to human friends. J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):860-7. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9546-1. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PMID: 24170391BACKGROUNDAllen K, Blascovich J, Mendes WB. Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends, and spouses: the truth about cats and dogs. Psychosom Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;64(5):727-39. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000024236.11538.41.
PMID: 12271103BACKGROUNDKertes DA, Liu J, Hall NJ, Hadad NA, Wynne CDL, Bhatt SS. Effect of Pet Dogs on Children's Perceived Stress and Cortisol Stress Response. Soc Dev. 2017 May;26(2):382-401. doi: 10.1111/sode.12203. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
PMID: 28439150BACKGROUNDOdendaal JS, Meintjes RA. Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs. Vet J. 2003 May;165(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/s1090-0233(02)00237-x.
PMID: 12672376BACKGROUNDBarker SB, Knisely JS, McCain NL, Best AM. Measuring stress and immune response in healthcare professionals following interaction with a therapy dog: a pilot study. Psychol Rep. 2005 Jun;96(3 Pt 1):713-29. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.3.713-729.
PMID: 16050629BACKGROUNDViau R, Arsenault-Lapierre G, Fecteau S, Champagne N, Walker CD, Lupien S. Effect of service dogs on salivary cortisol secretion in autistic children. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Sep;35(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PMID: 20189722BACKGROUNDBeetz A, Julius H, Turner D, Kotrschal K. Effects of social support by a dog on stress modulation in male children with insecure attachment. Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 28;3:352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00352. eCollection 2012.
PMID: 23162482BACKGROUNDRedefer LA, Goodman JF. Brief report: pet-facilitated therapy with autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1989 Sep;19(3):461-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02212943. No abstract available.
PMID: 2793790BACKGROUNDMartin F, Farnum J. Animal-assisted therapy for children with pervasive developmental disorders. West J Nurs Res. 2002 Oct;24(6):657-70. doi: 10.1177/019394502320555403.
PMID: 12365766BACKGROUNDNagasawa M, Kikusui T, Onaka T, Ohta M. Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Horm Behav. 2009 Mar;55(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.12.002. Epub 2008 Dec 14.
PMID: 19124024BACKGROUNDWestgarth C, Heron J, Ness AR, Bundred P, Gaskell RM, Coyne KP, German AJ, McCune S, Dawson S. Family pet ownership during childhood: findings from a UK birth cohort and implications for public health research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Oct;7(10):3704-29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103704. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
PMID: 21139856BACKGROUNDRisley-Curtiss C, Holley LC, Wolf S. The animal-human bond and ethnic diversity. Soc Work. 2006 Jul;51(3):257-68. doi: 10.1093/sw/51.3.257.
PMID: 17076123BACKGROUNDSable P. Pets, attachment, and well-being across the life cycle. Soc Work. 1995 May;40(3):334-41.
PMID: 7761919BACKGROUNDMcBurnett K, Lahey BB, Frick PJ, Risch C, Loeber R, Hart EL, Christ MA, Hanson KS. Anxiety, inhibition, and conduct disorder in children: II. Relation to salivary cortisol. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;30(2):192-6. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199103000-00005.
PMID: 2016221BACKGROUNDBadanes LS, Watamura SE, Hankin BL. Hypocortisolism as a potential marker of allostatic load in children: associations with family risk and internalizing disorders. Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Aug;23(3):881-896. doi: 10.1017/S095457941100037X.
PMID: 21756439BACKGROUNDDavis EP, Donzella B, Krueger WK, Gunnar MR. The start of a new school year: individual differences in salivary cortisol response in relation to child temperament. Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Nov;35(3):188-96. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199911)35:33.0.co;2-k.
PMID: 10531531BACKGROUNDSpies LA, Margolin G, Susman EJ, Gordis EB. Adolescents' cortisol reactivity and subjective distress in response to family conflict: the moderating role of internalizing symptoms. J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
PMID: 21939869BACKGROUNDDockray S, Susman EJ, Dorn LD. Depression, cortisol reactivity, and obesity in childhood and adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Oct;45(4):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
PMID: 19766938BACKGROUNDVirues-Ortega J, Buela-Casal G. Psychophysiological effects of human-animal interaction: theoretical issues and long-term interaction effects. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jan;194(1):52-7. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000195354.03653.63.
PMID: 16462556BACKGROUNDHavener L, Gentes L, Thaler B, Megel ME, Baun MM, Driscoll FA, Beiraghi S, Agrawal S. The effects of a companion animal on distress in children undergoing dental procedures. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Apr-Jun;24(2):137-52. doi: 10.1080/01460860118472.
PMID: 11817428BACKGROUNDAvenevoli S, Swendsen J, He JP, Burstein M, Merikangas KR. Major depression in the national comorbidity survey-adolescent supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;54(1):37-44.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25524788BACKGROUNDCummings JR, Druss BG. Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents with major depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;50(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
PMID: 21241953BACKGROUNDSmalley KB, Yancey CT, Warren JC, Naufel K, Ryan R, Pugh JL. Rural mental health and psychological treatment: a review for practitioners. J Clin Psychol. 2010 May;66(5):479-89. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20688.
PMID: 20222125BACKGROUNDLeiberg S, Klimecki O, Singer T. Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 9;6(3):e17798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017798.
PMID: 21408020BACKGROUNDGunnar MR, Talge NM, Herrera A. Stressor paradigms in developmental studies: what does and does not work to produce mean increases in salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Aug;34(7):953-67. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
PMID: 19321267BACKGROUNDEisenberg N, Fabes RA, Schaller M, Miller P, Carlo G, Poulin R, Shea C, Shell R. Personality and socialization correlates of vicarious emotional responding. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):459-70.
PMID: 1941517BACKGROUNDLuby JL, Svrakic DM, McCallum K, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR. The Junior Temperament and Character Inventory: preliminary validation of a child self-report measure. Psychol Rep. 1999 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1127-38. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3c.1127.
PMID: 10477935BACKGROUNDSherman GD, Haidt J, Coan JA. Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):282-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014904.
PMID: 19348541BACKGROUNDBelli RF. The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory. 1998 Jul;6(4):383-406. doi: 10.1080/741942610.
PMID: 9829098BACKGROUNDCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PMID: 6668417BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kristen C Jacobson, PhD
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be unaware of which study arm they are assigned. Individuals performing the interventions will be blind to study condition. The investigator will be blind to study condition until data analysis. Video data will be coded by observers blind to the study condition. The primary outcomes assessor is not blind to study condition.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2019
First Posted
May 14, 2019
Study Start
June 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
January 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication and will be available for up to 5 years post-publication.
- Access Criteria
- The PI will evaluate written requests for IPD sharing. All requests must be made from individuals with legitimate research questions and must be compliant with IRB regulations.
All IPD underlying research publications