NCT05037318

Brief Summary

Breaking bad news (e.g., telling patients that they have cancer) is not only very stressful for the patients concerned, but also for the physicians delivering the diagnosis. It is unclear how this burden and the associated communication performance can be optimized. The project contributes to this goal. The main goal of the project is to scientifically analyze to what extent the stress reaction and communication performance of medical students can be optimized when breaking bad news. Two strategies will be employed and tested for their effectiveness: First, "stress arousal reappraisal", which consists in reinterpreting physiological arousal (e.g., increased heart rate) as adaptive and beneficial for task performance. Second, medical students can be well prepared for breaking bad news by learning from worked examples (step-by-step demonstrations of how to break bad news). The investigators hypothesize that both strategies will shift the interpretation of breaking bad news from a threat to a challenge state. This will lead to better communication performance during the task. To test the hypothesis, about 200 medical students' communication performance, cardiovascular activity, stress hormone release, and subjective stress perception when communicating a serious cancer diagnosis to a simulated patient (actor) will be measured. The results of the study provide a first comprehensive picture of the psychophysiological stress patterns of medical students who are entrusted with a stressful communication task. Ultimately, this may promote stress management and communication skills in future physicians.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
229

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 8, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 21, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 29, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

August 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Breaking bad newsStressStress arousal reappraisalStressful communicationCommunication skillsWorked exampleBiopsychosocial model

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Breaking bad news performance

    SPIKES (6 items) and global Bad News Assessment Scale (glBAS; 5 items); both five-point ratings ranging from 1 to 5, glBAS is scored in reverse to match SPIKES scale, the higher the score, the better the performance

    After 2 hours. Duration: 12 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in self-reported mood

    During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  • Change in heart rate

    During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  • Change in pre-ejection period

    During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  • Change in challenge-threat cardiovascular index

    During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  • Change in anabolic balance

    During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Stress arousal reappraisal

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Stress arousal reappraisal

Worked examples

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Worked examples

Stress arousal reappraisal + Worked examples

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Stress arousal reappraisalBehavioral: Worked examples

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Participants will watch a video explaining that stress arousal is not harmful but rather functional and adaptive for performance in stressful situations.

Stress arousal reappraisalStress arousal reappraisal + Worked examples
Worked examplesBEHAVIORAL

The worked example will be in form of brief video sequences showing a physician (played by an actor) delivering the bad diagnosis of lung cancer to an SP following the SPIKES protocol.

Stress arousal reappraisal + Worked examplesWorked examples

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being currently enrolled as a third-year medical student
  • Being German speaker
  • Signed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiovascular diseases known to affect the variables under investigation
  • Neuroendocrine conditions known to affect the variables under investigation
  • Use of psychotropic drugs or any medication known to affect the variables under investigation (e.g., corticosteroids, cardioactive medication)
  • Wearing a pacemaker
  • Pregnancy/Breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute for Medical Education

Bern, 3012, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bosshard M, Schmitz FM, Guttormsen S, Nater UM, Gomez P, Berendonk C. From threat to challenge-Improving medical students' stress response and communication skills performance through the combination of stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based learning when breaking bad news to simulated patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2023 May 10;11(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01167-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Christoph Berendonk, PD Dr.

    University of Bern

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants know the content of their intervention, however, they do not know what other interventions there are and which group they belong to.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Two interventions are used, participants either receive only a stress reappraisal, only worked examples on breaking bad news, both interventions together, or none of the interventions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2021

First Posted

September 8, 2021

Study Start

April 21, 2022

Primary Completion

February 29, 2024

Study Completion

February 29, 2024

Last Updated

March 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

Time Frame
Data will be available as soon as the study is published.
Access Criteria
The investigators will make supplementary files and key datasets accompanying a publication to demonstrate reproducibility openly available in appropriate digital data repositories that conform to the Fair Data principles and maintained by a non-profit organisation. Specific datasets will be shared via domain-specific public repositories. Unstructured data will be shared via data repository Zenodo or Dryad. These data repositories fulfill biomedical journals' and SNSF's requirements (allowing publishing FAIR data, non-commercial).

Locations