Effect of Nurse-Led Intervention Programme Professional Quality of Life and Psychological Distress in Nurses
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nurses are at risk in terms of burnout and empathic fatigue. Therefore, efforts to protect the mental health of nurses are very important. It is stated that the studies conducted are mostly descriptive and not interventional. In addition, the evidence levels of interventional studies are low.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedDecember 8, 2020
December 1, 2020
3 months
April 8, 2019
December 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline compassion fatigue at 1 and 6 months assessed by compassion fatigue subscale of Professional quality of life scale
The compassion fatigue subscale of ProQOL-IV includes 10-items. Completion of the compassion fatigue subscale involves selecting response choices on a 0 (never) to 5 (very often) likert scale. 0-50 points can be taken from the compassion fatigue subscale. There is no cut-point. A number of items required reverse coding so that high scores on all items indicate high compassion fatigue.
Data collected before the program starts and one months after the end of the program and six months
Change from baseline burnout at 1 and 6 months assessed by burnout subscale of Professional quality of life scale
The burnout subscale of ProQOL-IV includes 10-items. Completion of the burnout subscale involves selecting response choices on a 0 (never) to 5 (very often) likert scale. 0-50 points can be taken from the burnout subscale. There is no cut-point. A number of items required reverse coding so that high scores on all items indicate high burnout.
Data collected before the program starts (pretest) and one months after the end of the program and six months
Change from baseline compassion satisfaction at 1 and 6 months assessed by compassion satisfaction subscale of Professional quality of life scale
The compassion satisfaction subscale of ProQOL-IV includes 10-items. Completion of the compassion satisfaction subscale involves selecting response choices on a 0 (never) to 5 (very often) likert scale. 0-50 points can be taken from the compassion satisfaction subscale. There is no cut-point. A number of items required reverse coding so that high scores on all items indicate high compassion satisfaction.
Data collected before the program starts (pretest) and one months after the end of the program and six months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline psychological distress at 1 and 6 months assessed by general health questionnaire
Data collected before the program starts (pretest) and one months after the end of the program and six months
Study Arms (2)
Nurse led intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe program was four sessions; It took about 1.5-2 hours. The intervention group was divided into two groups. The author who administered the intervention previously led nurse support groups, is also an active educator in psychiatry and mental health nursing, and has training in cognitive behavioral therapy. The group sessions were based on cognitive restructuring techniques.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention was applied to the control group during the study.
Interventions
This program is based on cognitive restructuring tecniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nurses who responded to the questionnaires received a score on compassion fatigue higher than the mean score (20 points)
- Nurses who worked at clinics and had at least six months of experience
You may not qualify if:
- Nurses who responded to the questionnaires received a score on compassion fatigue lower than the mean score (20 points)
- head nurses
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neslihan Günüşen
Izmir, 35340, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Marine A, Ruotsalainen J, Serra C, Verbeek J. Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub2.
PMID: 17054155BACKGROUNDPotter P, Deshields T, Berger JA, Clarke M, Olsen S, Chen L. Evaluation of a compassion fatigue resiliency program for oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Mar;40(2):180-7. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.180-187.
PMID: 23448743BACKGROUNDPfaff KA, Freeman-Gibb L, Patrick LJ, DiBiase R, Moretti O. Reducing the "cost of caring" in cancer care: Evaluation of a pilot interprofessional compassion fatigue resiliency programme. J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):512-519. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1309364. Epub 2017 May 4.
PMID: 28471255BACKGROUNDYilmaz G, Ustun B, Gunusen NP. Effect of a nurse-led intervention programme on professional quality of life and post-traumatic growth in oncology nurses. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Dec;24(6):e12687. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12687. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
PMID: 30079550BACKGROUNDGunusen NP, Ustun B. An RCT of coping and support groups to reduce burnout among nurses. Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Dec;57(4):485-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00808.x. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
PMID: 21050201BACKGROUNDKunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Konig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
PMID: 32627860DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 30, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
December 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share