NCT03891732

Brief Summary

Under the prostate cancer screening protocol of the project 'Prevention of Obesity-related Cancers', men with elevated PSA with higher prostate cancer risk (PSA 4-10 ng/mL with high Prostate Health Index (PHI) ≥35, or PSA\>10 ng/mL) will be offered a prostate biopsy. In the current study, we would like to offer all screened men with elevated PSA in the range of 4-50 ng/mL a biparametric non-contrast MRI prostate (screening protocol) for any suspicious lesion in the prostate. If there is MRI lesion seen, additional targeted biopsies can be performed on top of the standard systematic prostate biopsies. It has been shown in a clinical Caucasian cohort that doing MRI-targeted biopsies resulted in improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with standard systematic biopsies. In this study investigators would like to investigate the benefits of adding MRI prostate and MRI-targeted biopsy in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in a screened cohort of Chinese men at risk of prostate cancer.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
690

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 19, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2019

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate cancerPSAMRIBiopsy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • In men with higher risk of prostate cancer, the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI pathway compared with standard screening pathway.

    In men with higher risk of prostate cancer (PSA 10-50 ng/mL, or PSA 4-10 AND Prostate Health Index ≥35), the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI pathway compared with standard screening pathway.

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • In men with lower risk of prostate cancer the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI pathway compared with standard screening pathway.

    In men with lower risk of prostate cancer (PSA 4-10 ng/mL AND Prostate Health Index \<35), the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI pathway compared with standard screening pathway.

    Baseline (only one-time point)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Gleason ≥4 cancer AND Maximal cancer core length ≥6mm

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • The number of MRI needed to detect one extra clinically significant prostate cancer compared to standard screening pathway

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • The proportion of men that a biopsy can be avoided by using MRI in higher and lower risk groups

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • In men with MRI suspicious lesion (PI-RADS 3 or above), clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosed on Systematic biopsy cores versus targeted biopsy cores

    Baseline (only one-time point)

Study Arms (2)

MRI pathway

Plain biparametric MRI prostate applied to men with elevated PSA, on top of standard screening pathway using PSA and Prostate Health Index

Diagnostic Test: MRI prostate

Standard screening pathway

Intervention: Using blood tests PSA and Prostate Health Index to screen men at risk of prostate cancer

Interventions

MRI prostateDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

plain biparametric MRI prostate

MRI pathway

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 75 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants will be recruited form the the project 'Prevention of Obesity-related Cancers". 5000 Chinese men between age 50 and 75 will be screened for prostate cancer with the blood test PSA.

You may qualify if:

  • Men being screened for prostate cancer in the project 'Prevention of Obesity-related Cancers'
  • Age 50-75
  • Screening naïve, defined as no blood taking for PSA within past 5 years AND no prostate biopsy within past 5 years
  • PSA 4-50 ng/mL
  • Agree for non-contrast MRI scanning of prostate

You may not qualify if:

  • Men who are contraindicated for MRI( Pacemaker in-situ, Metallic implants which are not MRI-compatible, or Claustrophobia)
  • Prior history of prostate cancer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

North District Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Zhu Y, Wang HK, Qu YY, Ye DW. Prostate cancer in East Asia: evolving trend over the last decade. Asian J Androl. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(1):48-57. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.132780.

    PMID: 25080928BACKGROUND
  • Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Maattanen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

    PMID: 19297566BACKGROUND
  • Braillon A, Dubois G. Re: Fritz H. Schroder, Jonas Hugosson, Sigrid Carlsson, et al. Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur urol 2012;62:745-52. Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):e89; author reply e90-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.031. Epub 2012 Jul 25. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22858456BACKGROUND
  • Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Zappa M, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Maattanen L, Lilja H, Denis LJ, Recker F, Paez A, Bangma CH, Carlsson S, Puliti D, Villers A, Rebillard X, Hakama M, Stenman UH, Kujala P, Taari K, Aus G, Huber A, van der Kwast TH, van Schaik RH, de Koning HJ, Moss SM, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

    PMID: 25108889BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 27349564BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

    PMID: 28110982BACKGROUND
  • Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PMID: 30082150BACKGROUND
  • Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Roobol MJ, Hugosson J, Jones JS, Kattan MW, Klein E, Hamdy F, Neal D, Donovan J, Parekh DJ, Ankerst D, Bartsch G, Klocker H, Horninger W, Benchikh A, Salama G, Villers A, Freedland SJ, Moreira DM, Schroder FH, Lilja H. The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 1;16(17):4374-81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1328. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

    PMID: 20736330BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

    PMID: 27617315BACKGROUND
  • Chen R, Ren S; Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium; Yiu MK, Fai NC, Cheng WS, Ian LH, Naito S, Matsuda T, Kehinde E, Kural A, Chiu JY, Umbas R, Wei Q, Shi X, Zhou L, Huang J, Huang Y, Xie L, Ma L, Yin C, Xu D, Xu K, Ye Z, Liu C, Ye D, Gao X, Fu Q, Hou J, Yuan J, He D, Pan T, Ding Q, Jin F, Shi B, Wang G, Liu X, Wang D, Shen Z, Kong X, Xu W, Deng Y, Xia H, Cohen AN, Gao X, Xu C, Sun Y. Prostate cancer in Asia: A collaborative report. Asian J Urol. 2014 Oct;1(1):15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2014.08.007. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

    PMID: 29511634BACKGROUND
  • Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

    PMID: 26427566BACKGROUND
  • Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

    PMID: 29552975BACKGROUND
  • Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH, Moon MH. Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W226-W241. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19880. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

    PMID: 30240296BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCP, PhD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2019

First Posted

March 27, 2019

Study Start

January 19, 2019

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations