Microwave Needle Thermoablation for Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Conventional treatment options for localized prostate cancer include prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active surveillance. However, prostatectomy and radiotherapy carry certain degree of morbidity, including the risks of urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and injury to the surrounding organs like rectum and bladder. Active surveillance carries the risk of disease progression and psychological distress to the patients. Focal therapy employs the concept of only destroying the target lesion without treating other benign areas, resulting in disease cure in majority of cases with less treatment morbidity. Microwave treatment to the prostate has been performed since more than 20 years ago for benign prostatic hyperplasia and is approved by FDA in United States. It exerts its effect through thermal destruction of prostate tissue. Targeted treatment of localized prostate cancer using microwave needle ablation guided by MRI and Ultrasound imaging has been performed recently and was shown to be safe and effective. Our study aims to assess the effectiveness of this focal therapy in treating localized prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 11, 2023
CompletedMay 7, 2025
May 1, 2025
3.4 years
October 1, 2019
May 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The oncological control of prostate cancer
Any cancer detected on biopsy of each ablated area
At 6 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Per-patient analysis of any cancer detected on biopsy of any ablated areas
At 6 months after treatment
Cancer detection on biopsy of each ablated MRI visible lesion
At 6 months after treatment
Cancer detection on biopsy of each ablated MRI invisible lesion
At 6 months after treatment
Gleason 4 or 5 cancer detected on biopsy of ablated area
At 6 months after treatment
Out-of-field recurrence: Any cancer outside treated area on systematic biopsy
At 6 months after treatment
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Microwave needle thermoablation of prostate cancer
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment will be performed under general anaesthesia or monitored anaesthetic care using the Biomedical TATO3® Microwave needle thermoablation device (Koelis, Grenoble, France) under Organ-based Tracking® (OBT) mechanism of the Koelis Trinity® machine. Both Koelis Trinity and TATO3 are CE (European Conformity) marked in Europe. A transrectal sideview ultrasound probe is used for real-time imaging and OBT of the prostate. The TATO3® needle is inserted transperineally to the tumor under MRI-Ultrasound fusion OBT guidance with the treatment zone covering the whole tumor. The dominant MRI-visible lesion and up to 1-2 more MRI-visible or invisible lesion will be treated.
Interventions
In this study, we plan to investigate oncological outcome of fusion-guided microwave needle therapy using transperineal (TP) approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men aged between 45 - 75 years
- Life expectancy \> 10 years upon recruitment
- Localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer diagnosed on MRI-Ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy
- Organ-confined prostate cancer on MRI
- PSA \< 20 ng/mL
- At least 1 MRI visible lesion present and size ≤15mm, and Targeted biopsy showing Gleason score 6 (with cancer core length ≥6mm) or Gleason score 7 (3+4 or 4+3), With or without positive Systematic biopsy (out of 24 systematic cores) away from MRI visible target showing Gleason 6 cancer
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unfit for MRI exam or MR gadolinium contrast
- Patients with previous treatment of prostate cancer
- Patients with maximal length of target lesion \>15mm
- Patients with MRI-visible or invisible lesion within 10mm from rectum or 10mm from sphincter on MRI
- Patients with \>3 areas (MRI-visible or invisible) of prostate cancer
- Patients with Gleason score 4+4 or any Gleason pattern 5 cancer
- Patients with bladder pathology including bladder stone and bladder cancer
- Patients with urethral stricture
- Patients with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (17)
Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Zappa M, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Maattanen L, Lilja H, Denis LJ, Recker F, Paez A, Bangma CH, Carlsson S, Puliti D, Villers A, Rebillard X, Hakama M, Stenman UH, Kujala P, Taari K, Aus G, Huber A, van der Kwast TH, van Schaik RH, de Koning HJ, Moss SM, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PMID: 25108889BACKGROUNDWallis CJ, Herschorn S, Saskin R, Su J, Klotz LH, Chang M, Kulkarni GS, Lee Y, Kodama RT, Narod SA, Nam RK. Complications after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis. Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.037.
PMID: 25733275BACKGROUNDNam RK, Cheung P, Herschorn S, Saskin R, Su J, Klotz LH, Chang M, Kulkarni GS, Lee Y, Kodama RT, Narod SA. Incidence of complications other than urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):223-31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70606-5. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PMID: 24440474BACKGROUNDPotosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Penson DF, Harlan LC. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh259.
PMID: 15367568BACKGROUNDDrost FH, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Pickles T, Kakehi Y, Remmers S, van der Poel HG, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ; PRIAS study group. Can active surveillance really reduce the harms of overdiagnosing prostate cancer? A reflection of real life clinical practice in the PRIAS study. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):98-105. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.28.
PMID: 29594024BACKGROUNDHamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PMID: 27626136BACKGROUNDvan den Bergh RC, Giannarini G. Prostate cancer: surgery versus observation for localized prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jun;11(6):312-3. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.109. Epub 2014 May 13.
PMID: 24818851BACKGROUNDSathianathen NJ, Murphy DG, van den Bergh RC, Lawrentschuk N. Gleason pattern 4: active surveillance no more. BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):856-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.13333. Epub 2015 Oct 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 26390094BACKGROUNDAhdoot M, Lebastchi AH, Turkbey B, Wood B, Pinto PA. Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2019 May;31(3):200-206. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000515.
PMID: 30865133BACKGROUNDStabile A, Orczyk C, Hosking-Jervis F, Giganti F, Arya M, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Allen C, Punwani S, Jameson C, Freeman A, McCartan N, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Moore CM. Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):431-440. doi: 10.1111/bju.14710. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30753756BACKGROUNDNahar B, Parekh DJ. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: Where do we stand? Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):208-211. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 1.
PMID: 31053567BACKGROUNDHerrmann TR, Gross AJ, Schultheiss D, Kaufmann PM, Jonas U, Burchardt M. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of BPH: still a challenger? World J Urol. 2006 Sep;24(4):389-96. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0098-7. Epub 2006 Jun 3.
PMID: 16752156BACKGROUNDLerner LB, Thurmond P, Harsch MR, Martinson MS. Office-Based HE-TUMT Costs Less than Medication over Four Years in Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Surg Technol Int. 2015 May;26:182-9.
PMID: 26055008BACKGROUNDSchull A, Abdoul H, Bouazza N, Delongchamps NB. Feasibility and safety of OBTFusion targeted focal microwave ablation of the index tumor in patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer: intermediary results of the FOSTINE trial. (NCT03023345). Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Focal therapy and Imaging in Prostate and Kidney Cancer 2019.
BACKGROUNDLe Nobin J, Rosenkrantz AB, Villers A, Orczyk C, Deng FM, Melamed J, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, Taneja SS. Image Guided Focal Therapy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visible Prostate Cancer: Defining a 3-Dimensional Treatment Margin Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Histology Co-Registration Analysis. J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.080. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
PMID: 25711199BACKGROUNDA'Hern RP. Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med. 2001 Mar 30;20(6):859-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.721.
PMID: 11252008BACKGROUNDMottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Fanti S, et al. EAUEANM-ESUR-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2019. 2019.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter KF Chiu, MBChB,FRCSEd
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2019
First Posted
October 3, 2019
Study Start
October 8, 2019
Primary Completion
February 16, 2023
Study Completion
April 11, 2023
Last Updated
May 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share