The Performance of MRI Prostate in Men With Different Prostate Health Index (Phi) Values
1 other identifier
observational
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to investigate, in a larger cohort of consecutive men, the proportion of abnormal MRI prostate in different phi ranges, and the cancer detected in Chinese men with abnormal MRI. This study aims to evaluate whether MRI prostate can be omitted in men with lower suspicion of prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 22, 2024
November 1, 2024
2.1 years
June 24, 2022
November 20, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
In men with higher risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
In men with higher risk (phi\>35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
Baseline (only one-time point)
In men with lower risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
In men with lower risk (phi\<35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
Baseline (only one-time point)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥3 in MRI prostate
Baseline (only one-time point)
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥4 in MRI prostate
Baseline (only one-time point)
Proportion of low risk group diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with abnormal MRI
Baseline (only one-time point)
Eligibility Criteria
Men with elevated PSA of 4-10 ng/mL who were referred to the Urology clinic without prior prostate biopsy, will be included.
You may qualify if:
- Ethnically Chinese Men ≥18 years of age
- Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
- Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-10 ng/mL
- Serum Prostate health index (phi) result available
- Normal Digital rectal examination
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Past or current history of prostate cancer
- On 5-alpha reductase inhibitor in the past 6 months (e.g. Finasteride, Dutasteride)
- MRI prostate performed in past 5 years
- Contraindicated to undergo MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker in-situ, claustrophobia, estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50ml/min in serum renal function test within 3 months)
- Contraindicated for prostate biopsy (e.g. uncorrectable coagulopathy, active infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (18)
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
PMID: 31493960BACKGROUNDChan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PMID: 27932742BACKGROUNDWong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.
PMID: 30178778BACKGROUNDPresti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64051-7.
PMID: 12478119BACKGROUNDCarter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.
PMID: 2677409BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PMID: 28498624BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
PMID: 30396635BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PMID: 27897172BACKGROUNDTurkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30898406BACKGROUNDAlberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PMID: 30082150BACKGROUNDDrost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PMID: 31022301BACKGROUNDAhmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PMID: 28110982BACKGROUNDKasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
PMID: 29552975BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PMID: 27349564BACKGROUNDKim L, Boxall N, George A, Burling K, Acher P, Aning J, McCracken S, Page T, Gnanapragasam VJ. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study. BMC Med. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01548-3.
PMID: 32299423BACKGROUNDEpstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
PMID: 26492179BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
PMID: 27617315BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chu PS, Man CW, Hou SM, Ng CF. Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2251-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0826-7. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PMID: 25201460BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCS, PhD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2022
First Posted
June 30, 2022
Study Start
November 11, 2021
Primary Completion
December 27, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share