NCT05438524

Brief Summary

This study is to investigate, in a larger cohort of consecutive men, the proportion of abnormal MRI prostate in different phi ranges, and the cancer detected in Chinese men with abnormal MRI. This study aims to evaluate whether MRI prostate can be omitted in men with lower suspicion of prostate cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
159

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 11, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 27, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • In men with higher risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges

    In men with higher risk (phi\>35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • In men with lower risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges

    In men with lower risk (phi\<35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.

    Baseline (only one-time point)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥3 in MRI prostate

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥4 in MRI prostate

    Baseline (only one-time point)

  • Proportion of low risk group diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with abnormal MRI

    Baseline (only one-time point)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Men with elevated PSA of 4-10 ng/mL who were referred to the Urology clinic without prior prostate biopsy, will be included.

You may qualify if:

  • Ethnically Chinese Men ≥18 years of age
  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
  • Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-10 ng/mL
  • Serum Prostate health index (phi) result available
  • Normal Digital rectal examination
  • Able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Past or current history of prostate cancer
  • On 5-alpha reductase inhibitor in the past 6 months (e.g. Finasteride, Dutasteride)
  • MRI prostate performed in past 5 years
  • Contraindicated to undergo MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker in-situ, claustrophobia, estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50ml/min in serum renal function test within 3 months)
  • Contraindicated for prostate biopsy (e.g. uncorrectable coagulopathy, active infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

    PMID: 31493960BACKGROUND
  • Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

    PMID: 27932742BACKGROUND
  • Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30178778BACKGROUND
  • Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64051-7.

    PMID: 12478119BACKGROUND
  • Carter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.

    PMID: 2677409BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

    PMID: 28498624BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

    PMID: 30396635BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27897172BACKGROUND
  • Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

    PMID: 30898406BACKGROUND
  • Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PMID: 30082150BACKGROUND
  • Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.

    PMID: 31022301BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

    PMID: 28110982BACKGROUND
  • Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

    PMID: 29552975BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 27349564BACKGROUND
  • Kim L, Boxall N, George A, Burling K, Acher P, Aning J, McCracken S, Page T, Gnanapragasam VJ. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study. BMC Med. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01548-3.

    PMID: 32299423BACKGROUND
  • Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.

    PMID: 26492179BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

    PMID: 27617315BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chu PS, Man CW, Hou SM, Ng CF. Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2251-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0826-7. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

    PMID: 25201460BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCS, PhD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2022

First Posted

June 30, 2022

Study Start

November 11, 2021

Primary Completion

December 27, 2023

Study Completion

February 1, 2024

Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations