Understanding Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: a National Study
1 other identifier
observational
292
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Given how central Substitute Decision Makers (SDMs) are to the process leading to end of life decisions and sometimes, organ donation, it is striking how poorly understood this decision-making process is. A 2017 scoping review on the topic of soliciting SDM consent to organ donation reported on more than 168 studies covering a broad range of topics, including: SDM characteristics and predictors of consent; the process of soliciting consent; and the effect of the decision on subsequent process of care and on family well-being. An unexplored area, however, is factors - including modifiable factors - that influence SDM decision making at the end of life, which organ donation is part of, such as: responses to stress, support from extended families and friends, and personal beliefs about the ongoing medical conditions. This project seeks to fill this clear and important gap. In the ICU, at the end of life, SDMs are under incredible emotional distress, have often not eaten or slept properly for days preceding discussions about end of life and organ donation, and are also in the midst of grieving for their loved one. The time pressure poses challenges for SDMs' decision making. Thus, this study will investigate novel, potentially modifiable reasons for end of life decision so that we may better support this personally challenging and important decision, especially if organ donation decision interferes with the decision process. Primary objective: To investigate beliefs and experiences of SDMs involved in the decision-making process around withdrawal of life sustaining therapies . Secondary objective: To inform efforts to improve support for SDMs with the aim of improving the decision-making process end-of-life decisions, including when organ donation is involved.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedApril 23, 2024
April 1, 2024
5.7 years
February 15, 2019
April 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life
Assess which beliefs and experiences are associated with the decision to donate organs using open-ended questions. The responses obtained from the interviews will be analysed and classified based on the Leventhal's Common Sense Self-Regulation Model and the theoretical domain Framework. The most significant domains will help inform the creation of a larger scale national survey to help investigate what domains affect decision-making around end of life.
6 weeks to 2 months after patient's hospitalisation in the intensive care unit
Study Arms (1)
Multi-Methods Study
Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews Step 2: National Telephone Survey
Interventions
1. Cover SDMs' experience around: * withdrawal of life sustaining therapies * organ donation among those who were approached (including with the medical team and the organ donation organisation) * understanding of the situation * views on any gaps in the quantity or quality of information and discussion they received concerning their loved one's end-of-life care or donation process 2. Explore factors they perceived to influence their decision to consent to organ donation or not (or that would have influenced their decision for those not approached), and how such factors may have changed over the course of making this decision and since the decision (or since the event for those not approached).
Explore SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life and assess which beliefs are associated with the decision taken at the end of life, including decision to donate organs or not (and the strength of this association)
Eligibility Criteria
Surogate decision makers of critically ill deceased patients, potential organ donors. Are included all SDMs, whether the patient donated organs or not, or were approached for organ donation or not, thus providing a global view of the decision making at the end of life and how it is affected by organ donation, or how it affects organ donation when appropriate.
You may qualify if:
- Substitute decision maker (SDM) and patients with at least 18 years old
- SDM(s) of patients in the ICU with or without brain injury for whom withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies is considered or has been discussed.
- SDM(s) of patients for whom death is expected to occur within approximately 1 hour after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies
- English or French speakers SDM(s)
- SDM(s) reachable in ICU
You may not qualify if:
- SDM is not reachable after pre-consent in ICU (after 5 initial attempts within a 3-week period).
- SDM asks to postpone the interview more than 3 times.
- SDM unable to provide informed verbal consent for any reason.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Crawshaw J, Presseau J, van Allen Z, Pinheiro Carvalho L, Jordison K, English S, Fergusson DA, Lauzier F, Turgeon AF, Sarti AJ, Martin C, D'Aragon F, Li AH, Knoll G, Ball I, Brehaut J, Burns KEA, Fortin MC, Weiss M, Meade M, Marsolais P, Shemie S, Zaabat S, Dhanani S, Kitto SC, Chasse M; Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e034594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594.
PMID: 31874899DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Chassé, MD PhD FRCPC
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- FAMILY BASED
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2019
First Posted
February 22, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
April 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share