Study With Vortioxetine on Emotional Functioning in Patients With Depression
COMPLETE
Interventional, Open-label, Flexible-dose Study of Vortioxetine on Emotional Functioning in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Response to SSRI/SNRI Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
150
4 countries
23
Brief Summary
The study will evaluate effectiveness of flexible dose vortioxetine 10-20 mg/day on emotional functioning in patients with MDD with an inadequate response to SSRIs/SNRIs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 21, 2020
CompletedMarch 24, 2020
February 1, 2020
1 year
February 7, 2019
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline to Week 8 in Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) total score
The ODQ is a patient-centred, self-report measure of emotional symptoms present in patients treated with antidepressants. The ODQ is a 26-item patient self-complete measure, spread over 3 sections and covering 5 dimensions of: not caring (NC), emotional detachment (ED), positive reduction (PR), general reduction (GR), and antidepressant as cause (AC). Response options are based on 5-point Likert scale with a score applied to each response.
From baseline to Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change from baseline to Week 8 in MEI total score.
From baseline to Week 8
Change from baseline to Week 8 in DSST total score
From baseline to Week 8
Change from baseline to Week 8 in ODQ domain scores (NC, ED, PR, GR, and AC)
From baseline to Week 8
Change from baseline to Week 8 in MADRS total score
From baseline to Week 8
Change from baseline to Week 8 in SDS individual item scores (family, work, and social life)
From baseline to Week 8
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Vortioxetine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Flexible doses (10-20 mg) of vortioxetine; 10 mg during the first week which may be increased up to 20 mg week 2-8
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has a primary diagnosis of single or recurrent MDD according to DSM-5®. The current major depressive episode (MDE) must be confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
- The patient has had the current MDE for \<12 months.
- The patient has a Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 22 and ≤ 28 at the Baseline Visit.
- The patient has been treated with SSRI/SNRI monotherapy (citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine or venlafaxine) for at least 6 weeks at adequate dose for the current MDE and with an inadequate response and is a candidate for a switch in the investigator's opinion.
- The patient wants to switch antidepressant treatment.
- The patient has an ODQ total score ≥50 at baseline, while on SSRI/SNRI monotherapy (prior to switch).
- The patient answered "Yes "to the screening question on emotional effects.
You may not qualify if:
- \- The patient has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's clinical judgment or has made an actual suicide attempt in the previous 6 months prior to Baseline
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/Slead
Study Sites (23)
Office of Dr. Patrick Bourgoin (FR0011)
Angoulême, France
Cabinet Psyche (FR0012)
Douai, France
Centre Medical Ambroise Pare (FR0007)
Élancourt, France
Dr. David Modavi Md, Office Of (FR0001)
Toulouse, France
Private Practice Dr. Paule Khalifa (FR0010)
Toulouse, France
GHS De Nancy - CPN Laxou (FR0006)
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Dr Karim Boutayeb MD, Office of (FR0009)
Viersat, France
DSM Giulianova c/o ospedale di Giulianova (IT0004)
Giulianova, Italy
Dipartimento Salute Mentale ASL Lecce (IT0006)
Lecce, Italy
Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza - Azienda Ospedaliera Sant Andrea (IT0013)
Rome, Italy
JSC Romuvos Klinika (LT0002)
Kaunas, Lithuania
Mental Health Centre Kaunas Outpatient Clinic (LT0005)
Kaunas, Lithuania
JSC Nefridos klinika (LT0006)
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Jsc Silutes Mental Health And Psychotherapy Center (LT0001)
Šilutė, Lithuania
Antakalnis Psychiatric Consultation Centre (LT0003)
Vilnius, Lithuania
PI Mental Health Center of Zirmunai (LT0004)
Vilnius, Lithuania
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon (ES0009)
Alcorcón, Spain
Instituto Internacional de Neurociencias Aplicadas (ES0004)
Barcelona, Spain
Centro De Salud Mental De Foios (ES0002)
Foios, Spain
University of Oviedo (ES0011)
Oviedo, Spain
Francesca Canellas Dols (ES0005)
Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universiatrio de Salamanca (ES0001)
Salamanca, Spain
Centro De Especialidades A Doblada (ES0006)
Vigo, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Christensen MC, Adair M, Loft H, McIntyre RS. The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI): Analysis of the clinically relevant response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder and emotional blunting using data from the COMPLETE study. J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 15;323:547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.033. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
PMID: 36395989DERIVEDChristensen MC, Fagiolini A, Florea I, Loft H, Cuomo A, Goodwin GM. Validation of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire: Sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, and response threshold for the assessment of emotional blunting. J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.099. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
PMID: 34378539DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
LundbeckClinicalTrials@Lundbeck.com
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
February 5, 2019
Primary Completion
February 21, 2020
Study Completion
February 21, 2020
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02