A Clinical Effectiveness Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
A Clinical Effectiveness, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
228
1 country
50
Brief Summary
This research study will examine the safety and effectiveness of ONS-5010 in participants with AMD. The goal is to prevent vision loss by evaluating the effectiveness of ONS-5010 as compared with ranibizumab.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2019
50 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 8, 2021
CompletedMarch 19, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 years
February 6, 2019
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of subjects who gain 15 or more letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
BCVA to be assessed as letters read using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. A positive change represents an improvement in visual acuity.
Baseline, 11 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mean change in the best corrected visual acuity
Baseline, monthly to 11 months
Proportion of participants who gain at least 10 letters in the best corrected visual acuity
Baseline, 11 months
Proportion of participants who gain at least 5 letters in the best corrected visual acuity
Baseline, 11 months
Proportion of participants who lose fewer than 15 letters in the best corrected visual acuity
Baseline, 11 months
Proportion of participants with visual-acuity Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or worse
Baseline, 11 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
bevacizumab
EXPERIMENTALONS-5010
ranibizumab
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Active primary Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization lesions secondary to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye
- Best corrected visual acuity of 25-67 letters read (20/50 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent)
- Study eye must:
- Have active leakage on Fluorescein Angiogram involving the fovea
- Have edema involving the fovea
- Be free of scarring, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the central foveal zone
You may not qualify if:
- Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation in the study eye
- Laser photocoagulation (juxtafoveal or extrafoveal) in the study eye within 1-month preceding randomization
- Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye that may require medical or surgical intervention or contribute to vision loss within 1 year
- Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
- Current vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye
- Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in the study eye
- History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
- Infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
- Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
- Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception
- Current treatment for active systemic infection
- Known allergy to any component of the study drug or history of allergy to fluorescein , not amenable to treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (50)
Clinical Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710, United States
Clinical Site
Arcadia, California, 91007, United States
Clinical Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Clinical Site
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
Clinical Site
Glendale, California, 91203, United States
Clinical Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Clinical Site
Long Beach, California, 90807, United States
Clinical Site
Mountain View, California, 94040, United States
Clinical Site
Oxnard, California, 93036, United States
Clinical Site
Palm Desert, California, 92260, United States
Clinical Site
Poway, California, 92064, United States
Clinical Site
Sacramento, California, 95841, United States
Clinical Site
Santa Maria, California, 93454, United States
Clinical Site
Tustin, California, 92780, United States
Clinical Site
Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States
Clinical Site
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518, United States
Clinical Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Clinical Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33782, United States
Clinical Site
Sarasota, Florida, 24233, United States
Clinical Site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Clinical Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States
Clinical Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Clinical Site
Downers Grove, Illinois, 60615, United States
Clinical Site
Lemont, Illinois, 60439, United States
Clinical Site
Springfield, Illinois, 62704, United States
Clinical Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290, United States
Clinical Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740, United States
Clinical Site
Edina, Minnesota, 55435, United States
Clinical Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63144, United States
Clinical Site
Bloomfield, New Jersey, 07003, United States
Clinical Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109, United States
Clinical Site
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Clinical Site
Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, 17201, United States
Clinical Site
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146, United States
Clinical Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701, United States
Clinical Site
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Clinical Site
Abilene, Texas, 79606, United States
Clinical Site
Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States
Clinical Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012, United States
Clinical Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Clinical Site
Grapevine, Texas, 76051, United States
Clinical Site
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Clinical Site
McAllen, Texas, 78503, United States
Clinical Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Clinical Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78251, United States
Clinical Site
The Woodlands, Texas, 77384, United States
Clinical Site
Willow Park, Texas, 76807, United States
Clinical Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Clinical Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Clinical Site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jennifer M Kissner, PhD
Outlook Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
June 25, 2019
Primary Completion
June 7, 2021
Study Completion
July 8, 2021
Last Updated
March 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03