The Effect of Case-Based Learning Method on Perceived Competence and Critical Thinking Levels
Case-Based
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Second-year nursing students are randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The case-based teaching method was applied to the experimental group and the classical teaching method was applied to the control group. After the initiative, both groups observed differences in perceived competence and critical thinking levels. In addition, the focus groups were interviewed with the experimental group and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were evaluated qualitatively and the total mix method was used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
January 1, 2019
2 months
August 30, 2018
February 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
CRITICAL THINKING TENDENCY SCALE
It was developed by a Turkish researcher and reliability of validity was done. The scale covers 49.161% of the variance. Factor loads range from 0.33 to 0.71. Sub-dimensions: metacity, flexibility, systematicness, determination and patience, open mindedness. The scale consists of 49 questions in total. Scale your scale; I totally agree (5), I mostly agree (4), Partially agree (3), I mostly do not agree (2), I never agree (1). The test retest correlation coefficient of the scale was 0.761 and the correlation coefficient between the two half scores was 0.95. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient is 0.963. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the AMOS program (Ratio = 2778.981, Sd = 1073, X2 / Sd = 2.590, GFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.038). The total score ranges from 49 to 245, with a high score indicating a high tendency to think critically
4 months
Effect of case-based learning method on self-efficacy level
The German version was originally used by Schwarzer. It was originally prepared as 20 items, then reduced to 10 items. Over time, it has been translated and used in more than twenty languages. Item total correlations are between 0.30 and 0.77. Reliability of Turkish validity was done; Alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.79-0.63, total alpha coefficient was 0.83. Test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale is r = 0.80, p \<0.001. Factor analys's results of the Turkish version show that it accounts for 47% of the total variance. The item total score correlation coefficients are between 0.37 and 0.59. The items of the scale have scores ranging from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 10 to 40. High score is considered as high self-efficacy perception.
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Focus group interview
4 months
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group: case-based teaching method applied
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group: classical teaching method applied
Interventions
critical thinking, self efficacy, focus group interview
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Become a nursing 2nd year student
- Want to participate in the research
- Not to be in the health profession
- Having passed the course of internal medicine nursing
- Being the first to see the surgical diseases nursing course
- Be able to devote time for case discussions outside of class
You may not qualify if:
- \- Being a foreign national (Unable to speak / understand Turkish effectively)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Selçuk Univercity
Konya, Selçuklu/Konya, 0506234752, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctorate student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2018
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 15, 2018
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01