NCT03834389

Brief Summary

Second-year nursing students are randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The case-based teaching method was applied to the experimental group and the classical teaching method was applied to the control group. After the initiative, both groups observed differences in perceived competence and critical thinking levels. In addition, the focus groups were interviewed with the experimental group and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were evaluated qualitatively and the total mix method was used.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 30, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

case- based learningcritical thinkingself-efficacynursing educationnursing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • CRITICAL THINKING TENDENCY SCALE

    It was developed by a Turkish researcher and reliability of validity was done. The scale covers 49.161% of the variance. Factor loads range from 0.33 to 0.71. Sub-dimensions: metacity, flexibility, systematicness, determination and patience, open mindedness. The scale consists of 49 questions in total. Scale your scale; I totally agree (5), I mostly agree (4), Partially agree (3), I mostly do not agree (2), I never agree (1). The test retest correlation coefficient of the scale was 0.761 and the correlation coefficient between the two half scores was 0.95. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient is 0.963. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the AMOS program (Ratio = 2778.981, Sd = 1073, X2 / Sd = 2.590, GFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.038). The total score ranges from 49 to 245, with a high score indicating a high tendency to think critically

    4 months

  • Effect of case-based learning method on self-efficacy level

    The German version was originally used by Schwarzer. It was originally prepared as 20 items, then reduced to 10 items. Over time, it has been translated and used in more than twenty languages. Item total correlations are between 0.30 and 0.77. Reliability of Turkish validity was done; Alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.79-0.63, total alpha coefficient was 0.83. Test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale is r = 0.80, p \<0.001. Factor analys's results of the Turkish version show that it accounts for 47% of the total variance. The item total score correlation coefficients are between 0.37 and 0.59. The items of the scale have scores ranging from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 10 to 40. High score is considered as high self-efficacy perception.

    4 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Focus group interview

    4 months

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: case-based teaching method applied

Behavioral: Case- based Learning

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group: classical teaching method applied

Interventions

critical thinking, self efficacy, focus group interview

Experimental Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 26 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Become a nursing 2nd year student
  • Want to participate in the research
  • Not to be in the health profession
  • Having passed the course of internal medicine nursing
  • Being the first to see the surgical diseases nursing course
  • Be able to devote time for case discussions outside of class

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Being a foreign national (Unable to speak / understand Turkish effectively)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Selçuk Univercity

Konya, Selçuklu/Konya, 0506234752, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctorate student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2018

First Posted

February 8, 2019

Study Start

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion

February 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 15, 2018

Last Updated

February 8, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations