Nurse,Intramuscular Injection, Hybrid Simulation

NCT04464018 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: 60116787-020/4308
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 126
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study was conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study in order to determine the effect of hybrid simulation training on gaining the intramuscular injection skills of nursing students. The sample of the study consisted of 126 students (63 study groups, 63 control groups) enrolled in Nursing Principles Course at Pamukkale University Faculty of Health Sciences in 2018-2019 academic year. In the study, the study group performed hybrid simulation (standard patient+Digital half hip model simulator) and the control group performed simulation with low reality simulation method (hip/intramuscular model). Study data were collected using Student Identification Form, Intramuscular Injection Achievement Test, Intramuscular Injection Application Skill Assessment Form, Two Column Writing Reflective Thinking Strategies and Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning.

Conditions

Educational Problems

Keywords

intramuscular injection; hybrid simulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Intramuscular Injection Achievement Test

  This test contains 21 multiple choice questions, including IM injection application topics.

  This test was administered 3 times. before the theoretical subject is explained, after the theoretical subject is explained and after the hybrid simulation is applied

• Intramuscular Injection Application Skill Assessment Form

  The IM injection application skill assessment form consists of 39 application steps. the total was calculated over 100 points.

  This test was administered 1 time. applied after hybrid simulation

• Two Column Writing Reflective Thinking Strategies

  In the case of two-column text used in this research, the page is divided horizontally in the middle. Two questions were asked on the left and right side of the page.

  This test was administered 1 time. applied after hybrid simulation

• Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning

  It consists of two sub-dimensions," satisfaction with learning "and" self-confidence", and a total of 13 items.

  This test was administered 1 time. applied after hybrid simulation

Study Arms (2)

Working group

EXPERIMENTAL

Working group (hybrid simulation method) after the theoretical lecture, the application with hybrid simulation method is made by videotaping. Repeat the same practice after 1 Week

Other: working grup

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group (Low reality simulation method) after the theoretical lecture, the application with low reality simulation method is made. Repeat the same practice after 1 Week Control group received only general care

Interventions

working grup OTHER

After each student received theoretical training, they performed an intravenous injection on the model. In the study group performed hybrid simulation. After finishing the simulation application. the students went to the analysis room and watched their own application videos. The analysis session was held immediately after all the students in the group completed their applications.The IM injection success Test and Student Satisfaction and self-confidence scale were applied to the study and control groups after the laboratory application was completed.

Working group

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Students who have not received IM injection skills training before,
• who have no clinical experience,
• who have accepted to participate in the research

You may not qualify if:

• Students who have received IM injection skills training before,
• who have clinical experience,

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Pamukkale University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Turkey

Denizli, Pamukkale Universty Hospital, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Uys Y, Treadwell I. Using a simulated patient to transfer patient-centred skills from simulated practice to real patients in practice. Curationis. 2014;37(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v37i1.1184. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

  PMID: 26852426 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• arife şanlıalp zeyrek, pHd

  assistant researcher

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• nevin kuzu kurban, prof. dr

  responsible researcher

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: prelector

Model Details: randomized controlled experimental study

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 4, 2020
• First Posted: July 9, 2020
• Study Start: January 17, 2018
• Primary Completion: September 8, 2018
• Study Completion: October 15, 2019
• Last Updated: March 11, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL
• Time Frame: Findings can be shared after the study has been published.
• Access Criteria: The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, the test findings including the answers to the research questions and statistical analyzes will be shared.

Locations

TU (1)