The Use of Virtual Reality for Lumbar Pain Management in an Outpatient Spine Clinic
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The management of chronic pain is a significant public health issue related to escalating treatment costs, lost productivity, disability and medication use. The prevalence of chronic pain is rising alarmingly across all subpopulations with chronic low back pain (LBP) being labeled as one of the 15 most expensive medical conditions. Both study investigators are involved in the medical treatment of these patients. The investigators are interested in testing the effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies that address the complexity of chronic pain that is often mediated not only by physiologic variables, but also psychosocial issues. There is emerging evidence that Virtual Reality (VR) may be an effective pain management tool to augment care in this population, reducing medical costs, decreasing medication use, improving outcomes and empowering patients to take more control over their own health and management of chronic pain. Less is known about the use of this technology delivered in the context of care delivered in an outpatient clinical setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 23, 2021
February 1, 2021
3 months
January 17, 2019
February 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change is being assessed between two time points by The Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Self-report current pain rating on a 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
First time point: At the beginning of the injection clinic visit, prior to receiving the injection. Second time point: approximately 1 hour later, at the conclusion of the injection clinic visit, after receiving the injection
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change is being assessed between two time points by The Anxiety Thermometer
First time point: At the beginning of the injection clinic visit, prior to receiving the injection. Second time point: approximately 1 hour later, at the conclusion of the injection clinic visit, after receiving the injection
Virtual Reality Symptom Questionnaire
Measured at one time point approximately 1 hour from the time of randomization
Other Outcomes (1)
Interest questions about the guided relaxation content
Measured at one time point approximately 1 hour from the time of randomization
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTION15 participants will be randomly assigned to the control group. They will receive no intervention other than the injection (which is not a part of the trial). Pre-injection they will receive all baseline measures and questionnaires. Post injection they will receive the primary outcome measures: 1) Numeric Pain Rating Scale and 2) Anxiety thermometer
Audiovisual (AV) Guided Relaxation
ACTIVE COMPARATORCombination Product: Audiovisual Guided Relaxation Five-minute guided relaxation delivered via a computer screen and speakers
Virtual Reality (VR) Guided Relaxation
EXPERIMENTALCombination Product: Virtual Reality Guided Relaxation Five-minute guided relaxation delivered via a Samsung Galaxy 7s and the Samsung adaptable VR headset. Other Names: • Samsung Galaxy 7s/Samsung adaptable VR headset
Interventions
Five-minute guided relaxation delivered via a computer screen and speakers
Five-minute guided relaxation delivered via a Samsung Galaxy 7s and the Samsung adaptable VR headset.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients attending an appointment to receive a lumbar spinal injection.
- Patients meeting the definition of chronic LBP as established by the NIH task force: Back pain problem that has persisted at least 3 months, and has resulted in pain on at least half the days in the past 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Age younger than 18 years
- Not being fluent and literate in English
- Patients receiving injections in areas other than the lumbar or pelvic region
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (10)
Ames SL, Wolffsohn JS, McBrien NA. The development of a symptom questionnaire for assessing virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Mar;82(3):168-76. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000156307.95086.6.
PMID: 15767873BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, DeLitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):569-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMID: 24787228BACKGROUNDChan E, Foster S, Sambell R, Leong P. Clinical efficacy of virtual reality for acute procedural pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200987. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30052655BACKGROUNDChilds JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
PMID: 15928561BACKGROUNDDascal J, Reid M, IsHak WW, Spiegel B, Recacho J, Rosen B, Danovitch I. Virtual Reality and Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;14(1-2):14-21. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.
PMID: 28386517BACKGROUNDFarrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
PMID: 11690728BACKGROUNDHoutman IL, Bakker FC. The anxiety thermometer: a validation study. J Pers Assess. 1989 Fall;53(3):575-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_14.
PMID: 2778618BACKGROUNDIndovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.
PMID: 29485536BACKGROUNDKamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, van Tulder MW. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015 Feb 18;350:h444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h444.
PMID: 25694111BACKGROUNDWestenberg RF, Zale EL, Heinhuis TJ, Ozkan S, Nazzal A, Lee SG, Chen NC, Vranceanu AM. Does a Brief Mindfulness Exercise Improve Outcomes in Upper Extremity Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):790-798. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000086.
PMID: 29480886BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research,Care, and Education. (2011). Relieving {Pain} in {America}: {A} {Blueprint} for{Transforming} {Prevention}, {Care}, {Education}, and {Research}.
- Kamper, S. J., Apeldoorn, A. T., Chiarotto, A., Smeets, R. J. E. M.,Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Guzman, J., \& Tulder, M. W. V. (2015). Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David S Binder, MD
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Innovation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
April 8, 2019
Primary Completion
July 9, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share