Effect of Single-task, Dual-task and Analogy Training During Gait Rehabilitation
Examining Conscious Motor Processing and the Effect of Single-task, Dual-task and Analogy Training on Walking During Rehabilitation by Older Adults at Risk of Falling in Hong Kong: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to examine the effect of single-task, dual-task and analogy training during gait rehabilitation on conscious motor processing propensity, balance, walking ability and fear of falling by older adults at risk of falling in Hong Kong. One-hundred and five healthy older adults will be recruited from elderly community centres in Hong Kong by convenience sampling. They will be randomly assigned into 3 groups (i.e., single-task walking group (active control group), dual-task walking group and analogy walking group). Participants in different groups will have training sessions (about 45 minutes each) three times per week for 4 weeks in a group of 5 participants. A total of 12 sessions will be completed by each participant. All training sessions will be conducted by experienced Hong Kong registered Physiotherapists. In each training session, all groups will have warm-up (5 minutes), balance training (5 minutes), body transport training (5 minutes), body transport with hand manipulation training (5 minutes), walking training with various difficulties in a 10 meters walkway with different instructions in different walking groups (20 minutes) and cool down (5 minutes). Participants in the different groups will receive different instructions during walking training. Well- developed single-task (explicit), dual-task and analogy instructions will be utilized in the single-task walking group, dual-task walking group and analogy walking group, respectively. Each participant will undergo assessment sessions (total 3 assessment sessions) before training at baseline (T0), just after completion of all training sessions (T1) and 6 months after completion of all training sessions (T2). In the baseline assessment, a structural questionnaire will be used to ask for demographics, detailed history of fall incident, detailed medical history, social history and social-economic status of the participants. A battery of assessments will be done to assess physical and cognitive abilities of the participants in all assessment sessions. Single-task walking ability, dual-task walking ability, functional gait and balance assessment, cognitive function, fearing of falling and propensity for conscious motor processing. All participants will also be asked to record their number of falls prospectively at the time between T1 (completion of all training sessions) and T2 (6 months after completion of all training sessions) using a calendar. The number of falls within the 6-month follow- up period will then be collected.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2021
CompletedMarch 25, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.9 years
January 10, 2019
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Baseline propensity for conscious motor processing
The Chinese version Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS-C) (Masters et al., 2005; Wong et al., 2015a; Wong et al., 2015b). The MSRS-C includes two sub-scales: Conscious motor processing and Movement self-consciousness. The scores for both sub-scales ranges from 5-30. A higher score indicate a higher propensity for conscious motor processing.
Before the start of training
Change from baseline propensity for conscious motor processing upon completion of training
The Chinese version Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS-C) (Masters et al., 2005; Wong et al., 2015a; Wong et al., 2015b). The MSRS-C includes two sub-scales: Conscious motor processing and Movement self-consciousness. The scores for both sub-scales ranges from 5-30. A higher score indicate a higher propensity for conscious motor processing.
Upon completion of 12 Training Sessions (4 weeks of training)
Change from baseline propensity for conscious motor processing at 6 months after the completion of training
The Chinese version Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS-C) (Masters et al., 2005; Wong et al., 2015a; Wong et al., 2015b). The MSRS-C includes two sub-scales: Conscious motor processing and Movement self-consciousness. The scores for both sub-scales ranges from 5-30. A higher score indicate a higher propensity for conscious motor processing.
6 months after the completion of Training
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Baseline single-task walking ability
Before the start of training
Change from baseline single-task walking ability upon completion of training
Upon completion of 12 Training Sessions (4 weeks of training)
Change from baseline single-task walking ability at 6 months after the completion of training
6 months after the completion of Training
Baseline dual-task walking ability
Before the start of training
Change from baseline dual-task walking ability upon completion of training
Upon completion of 12 Training Sessions (4 weeks of training)
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Single-task Training Group
EXPERIMENTALSingle-task walking group
Dual-task Training Group
EXPERIMENTALDual-task walking group
Analogy Training Group
EXPERIMENTALAnalogy walking group
Interventions
In each training session, all groups will have warm-up (5 minutes), balance training (5 minutes), body transport training (5 minutes), body transport with hand manipulation training (5 minutes), walking training with various difficulties in a 10 meters walkway with Single-task Training instructions (20 minutes) and cool down (5 minutes).
In each training session, all groups will have warm-up (5 minutes), balance training (5 minutes), body transport training (5 minutes), body transport with hand manipulation training (5 minutes), walking training with various difficulties in a 10 meters walkway with Dual-task Training instructions (20 minutes) and cool down (5 minutes).
In each training session, all groups will have warm-up (5 minutes), balance training (5 minutes), body transport training (5 minutes), body transport with hand manipulation training (5 minutes), walking training with various difficulties in a 10 meters walkway with Analogy Training instructions (20 minutes) and cool down (5 minutes).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 65 or above;
- No history of cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease or other neurological deficit;
- Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C) (Folstein, Folstein, \& McHuge, 1975; Chiu, Lee, Chung, \& Kwong, 1994) total score of equal or more than 24;
- Able to walk independently indoor for at least 10 meters;
- Older adults with moderate to high risk of falling, as indicated by the score of less than 24 out of 28 in the Tinetti Balance Assessment Tool (Tinetti, 1986).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The HKJC Building for Interdisciplinary Research
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomson Wai Lung WONG
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2019
First Posted
January 22, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 31, 2021
Study Completion
August 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03