NCT03807934

Brief Summary

This study investigates the perceptual and cognitive influences of low-intensity electrical brain stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS), versus control (sham) conditions.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2013

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 17, 2019

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 14, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 14, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 5, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 years

First QC Date

January 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulationcognitive psychologynoninvasive brain stimulationelectrical brain stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Visual perceptual performance

    Ability to accurately and efficiently perceive perceptual information, including threat detection, local contrast gradient detection, face memory, and intent appraisal. All are computerized tasks.

    36 weeks

  • Verbal cognitive performance

    Ability to accurately and efficiently process verbal information, including verbal cued free association tasks, verbal long-term memory, and language comprehension. All are computerized tasks.

    36 weeks

  • Spatial cognitive performance

    Ability to accurately and efficiently process spatial information, including map learning, virtual urban navigation, and mental rotation. All are computerized tasks.

    72 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Active High-Definition Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Active high-definition stimulation of targeted brain regions involved in perception and cognition.

Other: Stimulation via Soterix Medical or Neuroelectrics noninvasive brain stimulation systems

Sham High-Definition Stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham high-definition stimulation of targeted brain regions involved in perception and cognition.

Other: Stimulation via Soterix Medical or Neuroelectrics noninvasive brain stimulation systems

Interventions

Active (at or below 2mA) versus sham (at or below 0.5mA) stimulation targeting brain regions engaged during verbal and/or spatial perceptual and cognitive processing. Brain stimulation devices are not currently regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Local IRB has determined the devices to be non-significant risk (NSR) devices via abbreviated investigational device exemption (IDE) procedure.

Active High-Definition StimulationSham High-Definition Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Between ages of 18-65.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of adverse reaction to tDCS (trans-cranial direct current stimulation).
  • History of seizure activity.
  • History of head injury (including neurosurgery).
  • History of illness causing brain injury.
  • History of other brain-related condition (such as traumatic brain injury).
  • History of diagnosis with a neurological or psychiatric disorder.
  • History of metal in head (outside of mouth), such as shrapnel, surgical clips, or fragments from welding or metalwork.
  • History of sensitive scalp.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tufts University

Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Brunye TT, Hussey EK, Fontes EB, Ward N. Modulating Applied Task Performance via Transcranial Electrical Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 30;13:140. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00140. eCollection 2019.

  • Brunye TT, Smith AM, Horner CB, Thomas AK. Verbal long-term memory is enhanced by retrieval practice but impaired by prefrontal direct current stimulation. Brain Cogn. 2018 Dec;128:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

  • Brunye TT. Modulating Spatial Processes and Navigation via Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: A Mini Review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 9;11:649. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00649. eCollection 2017.

  • Brunye TT, Moran JM, Cantelon J, Holmes A, Eddy MD, Mahoney CR, Taylor HA. Increasing breadth of semantic associations with left frontopolar direct current brain stimulation: a role for individual differences. Neuroreport. 2015 Mar 25;26(5):296-301. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000348.

  • Brunye TT, Holmes A, Cantelon J, Eddy MD, Gardony AL, Mahoney CR, Taylor HA. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction. Neuroreport. 2014 Oct 22;25(15):1175-9. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000214.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Repeated-measures crossover design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PI

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2019

First Posted

January 17, 2019

Study Start

April 15, 2013

Primary Completion

April 14, 2023

Study Completion

April 14, 2023

Last Updated

April 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations