Patient Centered-Rehabilitation ver111090.1
PCN1
Effects of 3mA HD-tDCS on Associative and Working Memory in Cognitively Intact Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As we age, a number of factors can reduce our cognitive (or thinking) abilities. This study will evaluate whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), which uses small amounts of electricity to modulate brain functioning, can improve cognitive abilities. Here, the effects of TES on working memory, learning, and memory, will be evaluated in a group of healthy older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 16, 2018
CompletedAugust 16, 2018
July 1, 2018
8 months
October 24, 2016
May 18, 2018
July 17, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Free Recall Total Error
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is an ecologically relevant measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a black screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Total Score is the sum of error for all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Free Recall Average Error
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is a measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a blank screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Score is the average error across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Free Recall Average Time to Respond
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is a measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a blank screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Cued Recall Total Error
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Total Score is the sum of error for all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Cued Recall Average Error
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Score is the average error across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Cued Recall Average Time to Respond
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Recognition Total Correct
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Recognition, participants are asked to select the correct location of an object from three options on the screen. Recognition total is the number of correct selections on all 15 trials. Higher scores represent better performance.
15 minutes after encoding
Object Location Touchscreen Task (Version C) Recognition Average Time to Respond
The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Recognition, participants are asked to select the correct location of an object from three options on the screen. Recognition Average Response Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.
15 minutes after encoding
Performance (d') on a Simple Attention (0-back) Test
The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.
30 minutes post-stimulation
Performance (d') on a Working Memory (2-back) Test
The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is the exact same as two items ago. Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.
30 minutes post-stimulation
Performance (d') on a Working Memory (Semantic 2-back) Test
The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During Semantic-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is in the same semantic category as the picture two items ago (e.g., both fruits). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.
30 minutes post-stimulation
Calculated Working Memory Performance Accounting for Simple Attention (2-back d' Minus 0-back d')
The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). During 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is the exact same as two items ago. Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. By subtracting the 0-back d', the calculated score represents a more pure working memory measure. Scores closer to zero or positive represent better working memory performance.
30 minutes post-stimulation
Calculated Working Memory Performance Accounting for Simple Attention (Semantic 2-back d' Minus 0-back d')
The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). During Semantic 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is in the same semantic category as the picture two items ago (e.g., both fruits). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. By subtracting the 0-back d', the calculated score represents a more pure working memory measure. Scores closer to zero or positive represent better working memory performance.
30 minutes post-stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Blinding in Total Sample
~1 minute post stimulation
Frequency of Endorsement (%) for Headache Item in Active and Sham Participants Undergoing HD-tDCS Session
~1 minute post stimulation
Frequency of Endorsement (%) for Neck Pain Item in Active and Sham Participants Undergoing HD-tDCS Session
~1 minute post stimulation
Frequency of Endorsement (%) for Scalp Pain Item in Active and Sham Participants Undergoing HD-tDCS Session
~1 minute post stimulation
Frequency of Endorsement (%) for Tingling Item in Active and Sham Participants Undergoing HD-tDCS Session
~1 minute post stimulation
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active HD-tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive "real" HD-tDCS (3 milliamps for 20 minutes) for a single session.
Sham HD-tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will undergo the exact same procedures as the active group but will receive sham stimulation for a single session.
Interventions
Participants will receive active HD-tDCS at 3mA for 20 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals with intact cognitive functioning.
- Participants will be age 50 or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a documented history of cognitive impairment.
- A history of serious mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, axis 2 disorders)
- Sensory or motor impairments that limit the ability to take part in the study
- A significant history or current use of alcohol or drug abuse/dependence
- Those who are currently pregnant (if there is a question of pregnancy, pregnancy tests will be available for participants at no charge)
- Participants with an Mini Mental State Examination score \<24 at screening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan - Department of Psychiatry
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Related Publications (1)
Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1133-45. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710001690. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
PMID: 21320389BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Annalise Rahman-Filipiak
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin M Hampstead, PhD
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2016
First Posted
January 27, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 16, 2018
Results First Posted
August 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share