Moderators and Mediators of Perceptual Learning
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,140
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a research study about how training can impact performance on cognitive tasks. Participants are between 18 and 30 and 60 to 85 years of age, have normal (or corrected to normal) vision, and have no neurological conditions that would preclude their ability to complete computerized cognitive tasks. Up to 1140 participants will be on study for up to 8 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
December 15, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.9 years
May 12, 2023
December 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Near Transfer Task
We will utilize an overarching task structure that allows us to assess learning on trained stimuli and transfer to untrained stimuli; locations, orientations, stimulus timings (e.g., we will assess contrast sensitivity for 6 different orientations). A trial begins with a fixation-point presented for 500ms. A target stimulus then appears for 128ms and then disappears (this timing was chosen to preclude participants making eye-movements to the stimuli). The participant is then required to respond by indicating the orientation of the stimulus (e.g., the major axis of a Gabor stimulus or gap-side of a C stimulus). In contrast tests, a staircase is run on the contrast of the target stimulus. In acuity tests, a staircase is run on the size of the stimulus. In parafoveal tests, stimuli are presented at 5° eccentricity.
Baseline to Post-test 2, an average of 5-8 weeks
Change in Transfer to Visual Search
In a T/L annular visual-search task (1° stimuli, presented at 5° eccentricity at each of 8 evenly spaced locations), on each trial, 7 positions are filled with a distractor (upside-down Ls, half black and half white), while 1 position contains a target (rightside-up T that is either white or black). Stimuli are presented for 256ms and, after a variable SOA, a stimulus-mask (asterixis) appears. Participants report the color of the T. A 3/1 staircase controls the SOA of the mask (shorter SOAs = less time between stimulus and mask = more difficult). This task tests how training impacts processing time (i.e., time necessary to find and identify targets). Also, given that the same locations are used as in the parafoveal training, we can also estimate the extent to which transfer to visual search occurs and, if so, whether it is specific to the trained location.
Baseline to Post-test 2, an average of 5-8 weeks
Change in Transfer to Reading
To understand visual performance related to reading, we employ the MNRead task, where participants read short sentences out-loud at various font-sizes. Dependent variables include reading speed, minimal text-size (another measure of acuity), and also critical print-size (text-size at which reading speed slows down).
Baseline to Post-test 2, an average of 5-8 weeks
Change in Transfer to Auditory Attention
The procedure is based upon a speaker-on-speaker task where participants choose between 36 call signs (a color and number) spoken by a speaker. This task measures auditory thresholds for speech in the presence of other talkers, when all talkers are spatially collocated compared to when they are spatially offset.
Baseline to Post-test 2, an average of 5-8 weeks
Study Arms (18)
C1 - Standard Perceptual Learning (SPL)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete SPL training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either SPL, LT, SS, MD, NT, TWF, or NCC.
C2 - Long Training (LT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete LT training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either LT, SPL, or NCC.
C3 - Short Staircases (SS)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete SS training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either SS, SPL, or NCC.
C4 - Mixed Difficulty (MD)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete MD training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either MD, SPL, or NCC.
C5 - Noise Training (NT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete NT training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either NT, SPL, or NCC.
C6 - Training with Flankers (TWF
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete TWF training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete eitherTWF, SPL, or NCC.
C7 - Parafoveal Training (PT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete PT training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either PT, SV, CF, ExAT, EnAT, MF, or NCC.
C8 - Stimulus Variety (SV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete SV training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either SV, PT, or NCC.
C8a - Complex Features (CF)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete CF training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either CF, PT, NCC.
C9 - Exogenous Attention Training (ExAT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete ExAT training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either ExAT, PT, NCC.
C10 - Endogenous Attention Training (EnAT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete EnAT training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either EnAT, PT, NCC.
C11 - Multisensory Facilitation (MF)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in younger cohort will complete MF training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either MF, PT, NCC.
No Contact Control
OTHERParticipants in younger cohort will complete NCC training during the first phase of training. In the cross-over they will then complete either SPL, LT, SS, MD, NT, TWF, PT, SV, CF, ExAT, EnAT, MF, NCC.
OA1 - Standard Perceptual Learning
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in older cohort will complete SPL condition.
OA2 - Noise Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in older cohort will complete NT condition.
OA3 - Training with Flankers
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in older cohort will complete TWF condition.
OA4 - Stimulus Variety
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in older cohort will complete SV condition.
OA5 - No Contact Control
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in older cohort will complete NCC condition.
Interventions
Each trial starts with a fixation point (500ms) after which a Gabor (1° radius, at cut-off SF of 25% accuracy, estimated from Pre-Test CSF, at either 45° or 135°) appears for 128ms. The task is to indicate whether the Gabor was tilted left or right. Gabor contrast will be controlled by a 3/1 staircase (converging on approximately \~80% contrast threshold) across all training sessions.
Will be the same as the SPL with the exception that each session in LT will be twice as long as in SPL.
The NT condition will be the same as SPL with the exception that contrast thresholds will be estimated in 5-different levels of external noise (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%).
TWF will be reasonably different from the standard SPL task. Here, on 50% of trials a target Gabor will be presented at either 45° or 135° (as in SPL) and will be flanked by two collinear Gabors. On the remaining 50% of trials, flankers will be present without a target. TWF is thus a yes/no detection task, which is necessary since the collinear flankers fully indicate the target orientation. In different 20-trial mini-blocks the flankers will appear either lambda, 1.5 lambda, or 2 lambda from the target (i.e., closer or further from the target) and target contrast will be controlled by a 3/1 staircase separately for each spacing.
The PT condition is the baseline for C8-C11 (all of which involve parafoveally presented targets). In PT, we utilize the same task as in SPL, however, in PT, in addition to central training, targets will also appear in one of two peripheral locations (5° eccentricity; angles = 135° and 270°). The location of targets will be randomized trial-wise so as to discourage eye-movements and independent 3/1 staircases will be run at each location. By training only 2 peripheral locations we can measure the extent to which training gives rise to location transfer (e.g., in transfer tasks examining performance at 8 different locations - 2 trained locations and 6 untrained locations). Furthermore, training at the central location facilitates comparisons between PT and SPL.
The base task for SV is the PT condition. However, SV employ 20 trial mini-blocks of different SFs (.75, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 cpd) and locations (45°, 135°, 225°, 315° - i.e., more locations than PT, but not the full set tested in the transfer battery) with separate staircases for each SF and location. Orientations will also be drawn from a larger set (22.5°, 45°, 67.5° - for which participants respond "clockwise" and 112.5°, 135°, 157.5° - for which participants respond "counter-clockwise") and will vary on a trial-by-trial basis. This design holds-out 4 locations and 2 orientations to address transfer.
This is the same as C8, however we will use band-pass filtered stimuli similar to what has been done by a number of groups including Hussein et al.
Stimuli will be presented in a similar manner as in PT. However, in ExAT, a 100% valid cue, a small black dot - 48ms duration with an 96ms SOA prior to stimulus onset - will appear above the target location on each trial.
Stimuli will be presented in a similar manner as in PT. However, in EnAT, a 100% valid cue (letter UL, LR; standing for upper left and lower right, respectively) - 150ms duration with an 500ms SOA prior to stimulus onset - will appear at the fixation point.
MF utilizes the same basic task structure as in ExEAT, however, rather than a visual cue, an auditory cue will be used (50ms, 1000hz tone with sound location determined by convolving sound with generic head-related transfer function, kemar large ears.
While not a "training condition" one type of experience that could be part of a condition is a no contact control (i.e., where participants do no training activities over the same rough time span as for the other training tasks).
Will be largely the same as SPL with the only difference being a change to the adaptive procedure. SS will use so-called "short-staircases," which are initialized at 60% contrast with steps of .05 log units and employs a 3/1 staircase that after every 40 trials is reset (the "short" in "short-staircases") back to 60% contrast.
This condition will be identical to SPL with the exception that two staircases - one a 2/1 staircase producing difficulties centered around 60-70% accuracy, the other a 4/1 staircase producing difficulties centered around 85-95% accuracy - will be utilized to control the stimuli.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between18 and 30 years of age (younger cohort)
- between 60 and 85 years of age (older cohort)
- Corrected vision of 20/40 or better (as assessed with an eye chart)
- No reported incidence of retinal pathology or neurological disease
You may not qualify if:
- Corrected vision of 20/40 or worse
- Evidence of retinal pathology or retinal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Wisconsin, Madisonlead
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of California
Riverside, California, 92521, United States
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
C. Shawn Green
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2023
First Posted
June 8, 2023
Study Start
April 14, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share