No-touch RFA Versus Traditional RFA for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Prospective Randomized Comparative Study on No-touch Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traditional RFA treatment has been a curable therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (diameter≤3cm). This technique ablates the tumor via radio frequency by inserting an electrode needle directly into the tumor. This clearly violates no-touch technique based on the principle of surgical oncology. Thus the 1-year recurrence rate of the cancer is up to 30% after the treatment, and the 3-year tumor-free survival rate is only 20% - 40%. No-touch RFA treatment avoids the direct contact with the tumor that can cause the spread of cancer cells in the liver, or the Antrim spread, Therefore it has been suggested that no-touch RFA treatment reduce the recurrence rate after operation in comparison with the traditional RFA treatment. This research project aims at using the prospective randomized comparative method to compare the short-term and the long-term curative effects between no-touch RFA and traditional RFA treatments for small hepatic carcinoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
4.6 years
July 5, 2016
September 13, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence Rate
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Recurrence-free Survival Rate
3 years
Overall Survival Rate
3 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Traditional RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsing Traditional RFA for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma
No-touch RFA
EXPERIMENTALUsing No-touch RFA for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma
Interventions
Radio frequency ablation via an ultrasound-guided electrode needle penetrating into the lesion center
Radio frequency ablation via an ultrasound-guided electrode needle penetrating into the tumor-free zone (within 5mm along the edge of the tumor)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the postoperative pathological examination as the standard, or the diagnostic criteria with reference to the 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases if the pathological evidence is not available;
- A single tumor with a diameter ≤3cm;
- The tumor that has not invaded the portal vein, the hepatic vein, or the secondary branch;
- Liver function classified as Child A or B;
- Liver reserve function test with ICG-R15 (indocyanine green retention at 15min) ≤30%, and the important organs that can function with the tolerance of RFA or partial hepatectomy;
- No significant coagulopathy: platelet count \> 50,000,000,000 /L, prolonged prothrombin time \< 5 seconds;
- Age 18 - 70 years old;
- No acceptance of other anti-cancer therapy before the treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Complication of severe portal hypertension: a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, a history of severe hypersplenism, or refractory ascites;
- Patients with extrahepatic metastasis or lymph node metastasis;
- Patients with multiple liver tumors found from imaging exam or during the treatment;
- Patients with pathological examinations showing the other tissue type of liver cancer after the treatment;
- Patients who expect to receive a liver transplant;
- Patients whose preoperative imaging exam indicates the tumor close to the gallbladder, hilar major blood vessels, bile ducts and surrounding vital organs, with a potential of serious injury by mistake or serious complications during the treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400038, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ma Kuansheng, Ph.D
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Candidate of Doctor in Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2016
First Posted
July 13, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09