NCT03712306

Brief Summary

In this RCT with the duration of 6 months among 264 community-dwelling older adults (65+ years) with habitual low protein intake, the investigators will examine the long term (cost) effectiveness of increasing daily protein intake to at least 1.2 gram/kg of adjusted body weight on physical functioning in older adults with low protein intake.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
276

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 11, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 19, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 6-month change in walk time on a 400 meter walk test

    Change in walk time on a 400 meter walk test

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • 6-months change in Physical performance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    6 months

  • 6-month change in hand grip strength

    6 months

  • 6-month change in leg strength

    6 months

  • 6-month change in body composition

    6 months

  • 3, and 6-moths self-reported mobility limitations (questionnaire)

    3 and 6 months

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Effectiveness of persuasive technology sub-study on protein intake

    6 months

  • Microbiota sub-study

    6 months

  • Effect of protein intake on satiety and reward responses measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

No intervention. Participants will only receive a brochure on general healthy eating habits.

Dietary advice

EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized nutritional advice from a registered dietician or nutritionist aimed at increasing protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d, through intake of regular protein rich food products and provided protein-enriched food products.

Other: Dietary advice

Dietary advice and advice on timing

EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized nutritional advice from a registered dietician or nutritionist aimed at increasing protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d, through intake of regular protein rich food products and provided protein-enriched food products, as well as advice regarding the consumption of protein rich food products in close proximity of usual physical activity.

Other: Dietary advice and advice on timing

Interventions

Dietary advice to increase protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d

Dietary advice

Dietary advice to increase protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d plus advice on consuming protein in close proximity of usual physical activity

Dietary advice and advice on timing

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 65 years;
  • Community-dwelling;
  • Lower protein intake defined as both a probability score above a certain cutoff on the protein screener (www.proteinscreener.nl) as well as based on actual protein intake assessed by 24-hour recalls. The protein screener was developed and validated using an extended FFQ among Dutch older adults. The cutoff will be chosen based on results of different studies in which the investigators compare the probability scores of the protein screener with protein intake as measured with food diaries and/or dietary recalls. The investigators will then choose the probability score that is most closely associated with a protein intake \< 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight/day. This probably score reflects older adults with a higher probability on a protein intake \< 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight/d than a general sample of older adults;

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Not able to eat independently;
  • Not able to speak, write and read the Dutch language;
  • Current participation to supervised behavioral or lifestyle intervention that intervenes with PROMISS intervention;
  • Not able the visit the research site in the following next 6 months;
  • Bedridden or wheelchair bound;
  • Individuals who do not go outside;
  • Diagnosed with severe kidney disease;
  • Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease;
  • Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type I;
  • Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 and starting with insulin;
  • Current treatment of cancer (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma);
  • Vegan diet;
  • Severe allergies to certain food products (such as peanuts, gluten);
  • Diagnosed with an eating disorder (self-reported);
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Helsinki

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Grasso AC, Olthof MR, Reinders I, Wijnhoven HAH, Visser M, Brouwer IA. Effect of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake on food consumption and the environmental impact of the diet in community-dwelling older adults: results from the PROMISS trial. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Dec;61(8):4015-4026. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-02896-x. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

  • Reinders I, Visser M, Jyvakorpi SK, Niskanen RT, Bosmans JE, Jornada Ben A, Brouwer IA, Kuijper LD, Olthof MR, Pitkala KH, Vijlbrief R, Suominen MH, Wijnhoven HAH. The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Feb;61(1):505-520. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02675-0. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

  • Reinders I, Wijnhoven HAH, Jyvakorpi SK, Suominen MH, Niskanen R, Bosmans JE, Brouwer IA, Fluitman KS, Klein MCA, Kuijper LD, van der Lubbe LM, Olthof MR, Pitkala KH, Vijlbrief R, Visser M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of personalised dietary advice aiming at increasing protein intake on physical functioning in community-dwelling older adults with lower habitual protein intake: rationale and design of the PROMISS randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):e040637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040637.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Protein-Energy Malnutrition

Interventions

Nutrition Assessment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Protein DeficiencyDeficiency DiseasesMalnutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Marjolein Visser, Prof., PhD

    VU University of Amsterdam

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized intro one of the three study groups. Stratification by gender and habitual protein intake (low protein (\>=0.9 g/kg aBW/day - \<1.0 g/kg aBW/day), very low protein (\<0.9 g/kg aBW/day)), since we expect a different intervention effect for participants with a very low baseline habitual protein intake (\< 0.9 g/kg aBW/d) compared to participants with a low baseline habitual protein intake (≥ 0.9 g/kg aBW/d), and because of potential differences in how women and men respond to the intervention. In case couples participate, we will make sure they will be allocated to the same intervention group. This will ensure no interference between intervention groups. We will randomly select whether the randomization for the intervention group is based on the men or the women.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2018

First Posted

October 19, 2018

Study Start

October 11, 2018

Primary Completion

July 31, 2020

Study Completion

August 14, 2020

Last Updated

September 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations