The (Cost)Effectiveness of Increasing Protein Intake on Physical Funtioning in Older Adults
The (Cost) Effectiveness of Increasing Daily Protein Intake to 1.2 Gram Per Kilo Body Weight on Physical Functioning in Community-dwelling Older Adults With a Habitual Daily Protein Intake < 1.0 Gram Per Kilo Body Weight
1 other identifier
interventional
276
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
In this RCT with the duration of 6 months among 264 community-dwelling older adults (65+ years) with habitual low protein intake, the investigators will examine the long term (cost) effectiveness of increasing daily protein intake to at least 1.2 gram/kg of adjusted body weight on physical functioning in older adults with low protein intake.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 14, 2020
CompletedSeptember 18, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.8 years
July 2, 2018
September 15, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
6-month change in walk time on a 400 meter walk test
Change in walk time on a 400 meter walk test
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
6-months change in Physical performance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
6 months
6-month change in hand grip strength
6 months
6-month change in leg strength
6 months
6-month change in body composition
6 months
3, and 6-moths self-reported mobility limitations (questionnaire)
3 and 6 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Effectiveness of persuasive technology sub-study on protein intake
6 months
Microbiota sub-study
6 months
Effect of protein intake on satiety and reward responses measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention. Participants will only receive a brochure on general healthy eating habits.
Dietary advice
EXPERIMENTALPersonalized nutritional advice from a registered dietician or nutritionist aimed at increasing protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d, through intake of regular protein rich food products and provided protein-enriched food products.
Dietary advice and advice on timing
EXPERIMENTALPersonalized nutritional advice from a registered dietician or nutritionist aimed at increasing protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d, through intake of regular protein rich food products and provided protein-enriched food products, as well as advice regarding the consumption of protein rich food products in close proximity of usual physical activity.
Interventions
Dietary advice to increase protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d
Dietary advice to increase protein intake to at least 1.2 g/kg adjusted body weight/d plus advice on consuming protein in close proximity of usual physical activity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 65 years;
- Community-dwelling;
- Lower protein intake defined as both a probability score above a certain cutoff on the protein screener (www.proteinscreener.nl) as well as based on actual protein intake assessed by 24-hour recalls. The protein screener was developed and validated using an extended FFQ among Dutch older adults. The cutoff will be chosen based on results of different studies in which the investigators compare the probability scores of the protein screener with protein intake as measured with food diaries and/or dietary recalls. The investigators will then choose the probability score that is most closely associated with a protein intake \< 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight/day. This probably score reflects older adults with a higher probability on a protein intake \< 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight/d than a general sample of older adults;
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
- Not able to eat independently;
- Not able to speak, write and read the Dutch language;
- Current participation to supervised behavioral or lifestyle intervention that intervenes with PROMISS intervention;
- Not able the visit the research site in the following next 6 months;
- Bedridden or wheelchair bound;
- Individuals who do not go outside;
- Diagnosed with severe kidney disease;
- Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease;
- Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type I;
- Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 and starting with insulin;
- Current treatment of cancer (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma);
- Vegan diet;
- Severe allergies to certain food products (such as peanuts, gluten);
- Diagnosed with an eating disorder (self-reported);
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VU University of Amsterdamlead
- University of Helsinkicollaborator
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmccollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Grasso AC, Olthof MR, Reinders I, Wijnhoven HAH, Visser M, Brouwer IA. Effect of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake on food consumption and the environmental impact of the diet in community-dwelling older adults: results from the PROMISS trial. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Dec;61(8):4015-4026. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-02896-x. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
PMID: 35788775DERIVEDReinders I, Visser M, Jyvakorpi SK, Niskanen RT, Bosmans JE, Jornada Ben A, Brouwer IA, Kuijper LD, Olthof MR, Pitkala KH, Vijlbrief R, Suominen MH, Wijnhoven HAH. The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Feb;61(1):505-520. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02675-0. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
PMID: 34609621DERIVEDReinders I, Wijnhoven HAH, Jyvakorpi SK, Suominen MH, Niskanen R, Bosmans JE, Brouwer IA, Fluitman KS, Klein MCA, Kuijper LD, van der Lubbe LM, Olthof MR, Pitkala KH, Vijlbrief R, Visser M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of personalised dietary advice aiming at increasing protein intake on physical functioning in community-dwelling older adults with lower habitual protein intake: rationale and design of the PROMISS randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):e040637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040637.
PMID: 33444206DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marjolein Visser, Prof., PhD
VU University of Amsterdam
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2018
First Posted
October 19, 2018
Study Start
October 11, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2020
Study Completion
August 14, 2020
Last Updated
September 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share