Ropivacaine For Post-POEM Pain Control
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) is an endoscopic procedure most commonly used to treat achalasia. Achalasia is a disorder resulting from the inability of esophageal muscles to relax.The POEM procedure, performed under general anesthesia, involves inserting an endoscope into the esophagus where a specialized knife is able to cut a new pathway through the esophageal tissue. The knife is then used to incise, and therefore loosen, tight muscles within the esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and the upper region of the stomach that are responsible for the symptoms.This study seeks to improve patient's post-operative pain levels by placing ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) into the newly cut pathway that is created in the POEM procedure. It is hypothesized that the topical irrigation of the POEM tunnel with ropivacaine will result in decreased pain scores and a decreased need for additional pain medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2021
CompletedJanuary 26, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.5 years
October 4, 2018
January 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-POEM pain level
To assess the effect of the intervention/placebo on pain 6-hours post-POEM as assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): The patient will be asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10, 0 representing no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain they have ever felt in their life.
6 hours post-POEM procedure
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Post-POEM pain level
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-POEM procedure
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score on the day of discharge
Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
Post-POEM analgesic
0 -6 hours post-procedure
Adverse Events
Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
Fentanyl consumption
Intra-procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ropivacaine
EXPERIMENTAL30mL of 0.2% Ropivacaine placed in the POEM tunnel
Normal Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATOR30mL of normal saline placed in the POEM tunnel
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age and older undergoing POEM procedure
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Fluent and literate in English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known adverse reactions to local anesthetics and NSAIDs (GFR\<50)
- Patients with chronic pain taking regular analgesics or narcotics (requiring daily opioid therapy \> 30 mg morphine or equivalents)
- Patients unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2, Canada
Related Publications (18)
Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson LW. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Sep;22(9):e256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01511.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
PMID: 20465592BACKGROUNDSamo S, Carlson DA, Gregory DL, Gawel SH, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004-2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
PMID: 27581064BACKGROUNDGoyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 May-Jun;42(5):610-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816b444d.
PMID: 18364578BACKGROUNDGoyal RK, Chaudhury A. Pathogenesis of achalasia: lessons from mutant mice. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct;139(4):1086-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 20800108BACKGROUNDClark SB, Rice TW, Tubbs RR, Richter JE, Goldblum JR. The nature of the myenteric infiltrate in achalasia: an immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Aug;24(8):1153-8. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200008000-00014.
PMID: 10935657BACKGROUNDRobertson CS, Martin BA, Atkinson M. Varicella-zoster virus DNA in the oesophageal myenteric plexus in achalasia. Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):299-302. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.299.
PMID: 8386130BACKGROUNDCastagliuolo I, Brun P, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, Palu G, Costantino M, Baldan N, Zaninotto G. Esophageal achalasia: is the herpes simplex virus really innocent? J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Jan;8(1):24-30; discussion 30. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.004.
PMID: 14746832BACKGROUNDNiwamoto H, Okamoto E, Fujimoto J, Takeuchi M, Furuyama J, Yamamoto Y. Are human herpes viruses or measles virus associated with esophageal achalasia? Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Apr;40(4):859-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02064992.
PMID: 7720482BACKGROUNDBirgisson S, Galinski MS, Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Achalasia is not associated with measles or known herpes and human papilloma viruses. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Feb;42(2):300-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018805600276.
PMID: 9052510BACKGROUNDVerne GN, Sallustio JE, Eaker EY. Anti-myenteric neuronal antibodies in patients with achalasia. A prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Feb;42(2):307-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1018857617115.
PMID: 9052511BACKGROUNDKallel-Sellami M, Karoui S, Romdhane H, Laadhar L, Serghini M, Boubaker J, Lahmar H, Filali A, Makni S. Circulating antimyenteric autoantibodies in Tunisian patients with idiopathic achalasia. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(8):782-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01398.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
PMID: 22947106BACKGROUNDVaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
PMID: 23877351BACKGROUNDSchlottmann F, Herbella F, Allaix ME, Patti MG. Modern management of esophageal achalasia: From pathophysiology to treatment. Curr Probl Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):10-37. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 29548347BACKGROUNDInoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
PMID: 20354937BACKGROUNDSchlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):451-460. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002311.
PMID: 28549006BACKGROUNDUjiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042.
PMID: 24074429BACKGROUNDde La Coussaye JE, Eledjam JJ, Brugada J, Sassine A. [Cardiotoxicity of local anesthetics]. Cah Anesthesiol. 1993;41(6):589-98. French.
PMID: 8287299BACKGROUNDScott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989 Nov;69(5):563-9.
PMID: 2679230BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Bechara, M.D.
Queens University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomized by an independent research pharmacist to receive either 30mL 0.2% ropivacaine or 30mL of placebo (saline), both being clear, colorless solutions. These samples will be prepared by the research pharmacist 2-3 weeks prior to the procedure and stored until the procedure date as per pharmacy standards. On the morning of the procedure, the study solution will be taken to the operating room with the patient. During the POEM procedure, prior to closure of the mucosotomy, the study solution is instilled into the tunnel. The investigator, patient, care provider, and research coordinator will be blinded to the group assignment.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2018
First Posted
October 11, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 18, 2021
Last Updated
January 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share