NCT03175081

Brief Summary

Obesity is a metabolic disorder that has gradually become a prevalent public health problem and is becoming one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. The most efficacious therapy for morbid obesity today is bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery increases life expectancy by correcting the comorbidities associated with obesity, improves the quality of life, and is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. There is an increase application of laparoscopic procedures as it is considered to cause less pain than traditional open surgery, smaller incision, reduced blood loss and shorter postoperative stay, which cuts down on hospital cost. However, postoperative pain still exists causing unpleasant experience for the patient and at times causes a delayed discharge. Pain after bariatric surgery is a result of many mechanisms such as tissue injury, abdominal distention, local trauma of the stomach, chemical irritation of the peritoneum, and the pneumoperitoneum and this pain potentially can prolong hospital stay and lead to increased morbidity, and bariatric surgeons are striving to minimize the morbidity of current procedures to improve patient outcomes and this gave rise to the use of intraperitoneal local anesthetics (LA). It was found that the use of intraperitoneal LA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, and it results in a statistically significant reduction in early postoperative abdominal pain. Many studies were done to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal LA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gynecologic procedures and appendectomy but to date there are limited studies done to evaluate the role of intraperitoneal LA in bariatric surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraperitoneal instillation of local ropivacaine on postoperative abdominal pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We hypothesized that the administration of intraperitoneal instillation of local ropivacaine would help reduce postoperative pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 27, 2017

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2017

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 27, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

May 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Intraperitoneal local anestheticRopivacainePostoperative painBariatric surgerySleeve gastrectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • 2 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    2 hours after surgery

  • 4 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    4 hours after surgery

  • 6 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    6 hours after surgery

  • 8 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    8 hours after surgery

  • 24 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    24 hours after surgery

  • 48 hours postoperative pain at rest

    Measured by visual analogue pain scale

    48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • 2 hours postoperative pain at cough

    2 hours after surgery

  • 4 hours postoperative pain at cough

    4 hours after surgery

  • 6 hours postoperative pain at cough

    6 hours after surgery

  • 8 hours postoperative pain at cough

    8 hours after surgery

  • 24 hours postoperative pain at cough

    24 hours after surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Test group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with ropivacaine diluted in normal saline injected along the stomach region at the end of the surgical procedure.

Drug: Ropivacaine

Control group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with only normal saline injected along the stomach region at the end of the surgical procedure.

Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

Patient undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will receive 20mL of 150mg ropivacaine (0.75%) diluted in 180mL normal saline to be injected through a catheter along the greater curvature and left subdiaphragmatic region of the stomach at the end of the surgical procedure. After the surgery, the medical doctors or nurses in the ward that is not otherwise involved in this research will assess and record the pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated at two, four, six, eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.

Also known as: Test group
Test group

Patient undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will receive 200mL normal saline to be injected through a catheter along the greater curvature and left subdiaphragmatic region of the stomach at the end of the surgical procedure. After the surgery, the medical doctors or nurses in the ward that is not otherwise involved in this research will assess and record the pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated at two, four, six, eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.

Also known as: Control group
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • i. Patients age 18 years and above ii. Patients who can communicate in English or Malay iii. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy iv. Able to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • i. Patients age below 18 years ii. Patients are allergic to ropivacaine or local anaesthetic iii. Inability to informed consent iv. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification \> 3 v. Patients with chronic medical diseases (eg. Ischaemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac failure) and chronic opioid treatment vi. Patients with previous foregut surgery including esophageal, gastric, liver, and pancreas resections

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hospital Kuala Lumpur

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Malaysia

Location

Hospital Serdang

Kajang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Sjostrom L. Bariatric surgery and reduction in morbidity and mortality: experiences from the SOS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Dec;32 Suppl 7:S93-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.244.

    PMID: 19136998BACKGROUND
  • Lee YC, Lee CK, Liew PL, Lin YC, Lee WJ. Evaluation of quality of life and impact of personality in Chinese obese patients following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Jul-Aug;58(109):1248-51. doi: 10.5754/hge10619.

    PMID: 21937388BACKGROUND
  • Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel; Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N, Bellanger D, Boza C, El Mourad H, France M, Gagner M, Galvao-Neto M, Higa KD, Himpens J, Hutchinson CM, Jacobs M, Jorgensen JO, Jossart G, Lakdawala M, Nguyen NT, Nocca D, Prager G, Pomp A, Ramos AC, Rosenthal RJ, Shah S, Vix M, Wittgrove A, Zundel N. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

    PMID: 22248433BACKGROUND
  • Dixon JB, le Roux CW, Rubino F, Zimmet P. Bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2300-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60401-2. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

    PMID: 22683132BACKGROUND
  • Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):273-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01374.x.

    PMID: 10718794BACKGROUND
  • Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Gagner M. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):231-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826cc714.

    PMID: 23023201BACKGROUND
  • Pequignot A, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Dhahri A, Brehant O, Bartoli E, Delcenserie R, Yzet T, Regimbeau JM. Is there a place for pigtail drains in the management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? Obes Surg. 2012 May;22(5):712-20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0.

    PMID: 22328096BACKGROUND
  • Kim TH, Kang H, Hong JH, Park JS, Baek CW, Kim JY, Jung YH, Kim HK. Intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3183-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1684-3. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

    PMID: 21487863BACKGROUND
  • Chazelet C, Verhaeghe P, Perterli R, Fennich S, Houdart R, Topart R, Tussiot J, Skawinski P, Seraille G, Catheline JM, Merabet M, Dehaye B, Pautot V, Juglard G, Sala JJ. [Longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone bariatric procedure: Results of a multicenter retrospective study]. J Chir (Paris). 2009 Aug;146(4):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jchir.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Sep 16. French.

    PMID: 19762021BACKGROUND
  • Louizos AA, Hadzilia SJ, Leandros E, Kouroukli IK, Georgiou LG, Bramis JP. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Surg Endosc. 2005 Nov;19(11):1503-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-3002-4. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

    PMID: 16328673BACKGROUND
  • Elhakim M, Elkott M, Ali NM, Tahoun HM. Intraperitoneal lidocaine for postoperative pain after laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Mar;44(3):280-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440310.x.

    PMID: 10714840BACKGROUND
  • Barczynski M, Konturek A, Herman RM. Superiority of preemptive analgesia with intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine before rather than after the creation of pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul;20(7):1088-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0458-1. Epub 2006 May 13.

  • Lepner U, Goroshina J, Samarutel J. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised prospective double-blind clinical trial. Scand J Surg. 2003;92(2):121-4.

  • Khan MR, Raza R, Zafar SN, Shamim F, Raza SA, Pal KM, Zafar H, Alvi R, Chawla T, Azmi R. Intraperitoneal lignocaine (lidocaine) versus bupivacaine after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):662-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

  • Malhotra N, Chanana C, Roy KK, Kumar S, Rewari V, Sharma JB. To compare the efficacy of two doses of intraperitoneal bupivacaine for pain relief after operative laparoscopy in gynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Oct;276(4):323-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0337-1. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

  • Ceyhan T, Teksoz E, Gungor S, Goktolga U, Pabuccu R. Effect of bupivacaine after operative laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):326-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.003.

  • Jiranantarat V, Rushatamukayanunt W, Lert-akyamanee N, Sirijearanai R, Piromrat I, Suwannanonda P, Muangkasem J. Analgesic effect of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine for postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85 Suppl 3:S897-903.

  • Park YH, Kang H, Woo YC, Park SG, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY, Koo GH, Kim SD, Park JS. The effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine on pain after laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

  • Ruiz-Tovar J, Gonzalez J, Garcia A, Cruz C, Rivas S, Jimenez M, Ferrigni C, Duran M. Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Irrigation in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Obes Surg. 2016 Nov;26(11):2616-2621. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2142-z.

  • Lee IO, Kim SH, Kong MH, Lee MK, Kim NS, Choi YS, Lim SH. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effect and timing of incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;48(6):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03016830.

  • Symons JL, Kemmeter PR, Davis AT, Foote JA, Baker RS, Bettendorf MJ, Paulson JE. A double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial of intraperitoneal bupivacaine in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Mar;204(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.013.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OverweightObesityPain, Postoperative

Interventions

RopivacaineSaline SolutionControl Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsEpidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Lim Shu Yu, MS

    Universiti Putra Malaysia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study will involve two groups with equal allocation of patients in the test group (local anaesthesia) and control group (normal saline) by randomization. All patients who agree to participate in this study will be randomized into one of the study groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior lecturer/ consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2017

First Posted

June 5, 2017

Study Start

April 27, 2017

Primary Completion

February 27, 2018

Study Completion

April 27, 2018

Last Updated

January 25, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations