Study Stopped
Recruitment issues
Perineal Local Infiltration Study
PLIS
Analgesic Benefit of Locally Injected Bupivacaine on Perineal Pain Among Women With Epidural Anesthesia After a Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized, Single-masked, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The prevalence of birth canal lacerations is more than 70% of all deliveries in Canada. The repair of such lacerations is usually done using a pre-existing epidural analgesia. Once the analgesic effect of the epidural analgesia fades, the laceration may cause intolerable pain, and result in emotional stress, difficulties in ambulation and breastfeeding, and more. The research team hypothesis is that adding a locally injected analgesic, which will take effect once the epidural analgesia fades, may alleviate perineal pain, prevent such difficulties, and improve women's overall well-being and satisfaction. The proposed trial is a two-arm, single-masked, randomized trial. Women with a working epidural analgesia, and a laceration will be invited to participate. Women in the local anesthesia (LA) arm will get a LA injected to the laceration and women in the sham arm will get no injection. The differences in perineal pain between the groups will be evaluated at 6 hours after last epidural dose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 9, 2022
CompletedMay 18, 2022
May 1, 2022
3.7 years
March 26, 2018
May 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of women who have a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score≤4 at 6-hours (±30 minutes) after last epidural bolus (comparison between bupivacaine arm and the no analgesic arm)
Comparison between the bupivacaine arm and the no analgesic arm in terms of pain score at 6-hours.
6-hours (±30 minutes) after last epidural bolus.
Other Outcomes (7)
Time to first ambulation (getting out of bed).
24 hours
Number of administration of additional analgesics in the first 24 hours after last epidural bolus.
24 hours
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10, acceptable if < 3) at 12 and 24 hours (±30 minutes) after last epidural bolus
12 and 24 hours
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe edges of the 2PT/Epi will be infiltrated with 10ml of Bupivacaine 0.5%+Epinephrine 50mcg prior to suture placement.
Control arm
SHAM COMPARATORSham injection will be done using a syringe filled with 10ml of NaCl 0.9%, but the fluid will not be injected to the edges of the laceration but discarded. The sham injection will last no less than 10 seconds.
Interventions
Local infiltration of the perineum with Bupivacaine 0.5%+Epinephrine 50mc
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Maternal age \> 18 years of age
- Gestational age≥34 weeks of gestation
- Vaginal delivery
- Perineal laceration (2PT/Epi)
- Effective epidural anesthesia
- No known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or amino-amide anesthetics
You may not qualify if:
- Medical history of a chronic pain syndrome
- Intrapartum morphine use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Khan GQ, Lilford RJ. Wound pain may be reduced by prior infiltration of the episiotomy site after delivery under epidural analgesia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Apr;94(4):341-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03102.x.
PMID: 3580317BACKGROUNDSchinkel N, Colbus L, Soltner C, Parot-Schinkel E, Naar L, Fournie A, Granry JC, Beydon L. Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Jul;19(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
PMID: 20627696BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amir Aviram, MD
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- a randomized, single-masked, controlled trial
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2018
First Posted
September 14, 2018
Study Start
September 14, 2018
Primary Completion
May 9, 2022
Study Completion
May 9, 2022
Last Updated
May 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05