Study Stopped
COVID-19
Needle-free Dental Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many patients experience pain and anxiety from traditional needle anesthesia and may avoid necessary dental treatments. The needle-free liquid jet injection(NFLJI) could solve these problems. NFLJI delivers drug solutions by creating a micro-thin pressure liquid jet to penetrate the skin and disperse in the soft tissue. It has many advantages like eliminating injection pain, needle phobia and needle disposal. However, anesthesia techniques in dentistry were all developed for needle injection, and they are not very effective for NFLJI. Moreover, clinical trials of dental anesthesia using NFLJI have shown inconsistent efficacy. In this study, we aim to compare the clinical efficacy between NFLJI and needle dental anesthesia in pilot split-mouth cross-over randomized clinical trials, assess the feasibility to conduct such trial on a larger scale. Participants will be assigned to one of the following four groups: 1. Infiltration on a maxillary lateral incisor,2. Inferior alveolar nerve block, 3.Mental nerve block, 4. Infraorbital nerve block. Each participant will receive one injection with a needle and another one with NFLJI randomly at the same appointment. A washout period of 1 hour between two procedures for participants' to forget the previous experience. Needle injection will be performed according to clinical standards. NFLJI will be performed according to a guideline developed in our research group. Participants will stay in the clinic until the anesthesia effect disappear and be followed for one week. The primary outcome is the efficacy and effect of two anesthesia interventions. The secondary outcome is the pain and anxiety visual analogue scale before and during injection, taste preference, and complications. Additionally, patients' overall feelings for two interventions as well as any barriers to conducting such a trial will be recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
September 1, 2021
4.4 years
July 22, 2020
September 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Dental pulp anesthesia
Dental pulp anesthesia result is measured by an electric pulp test(EPT), successful anesthesia for dental pulp exhibits an EPT at 80.
10 minutes after injection.
Efficacy of dental pulp anesthesia
The number of sucessful dental pulp anesthesia cases over total number of participants in the group.
10 minutes after injection.
Time to initiation of anesthesia
Time to initiation of anesthesia feeling, measured by a simple pinch test using a periodontal probe
1 minute after injection
Time to termination of anesthesia
Time to termination of anesthesia feeling, measured by a simple pinch test using a periodontal probe
3 hours after injection
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Baseline pain level
1 minute before injection
Pain level during injection
10 seconds after the injection
Baseline anxiety level
1 minute before injection
Anxiety level during injection
10 seconds after the injection.
Taste preference
1 minute after the injection
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Participant's feedbacks
20 minutes after all procedures.
Barriers
through study completion, from date of recruitment until the date of last follow-up case complition, an average of 6 month.
Study Arms (8)
Needle Infiltration anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received one needle injection of infiltration anesthesia at left or right upper lateral incisors using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle-free infiltration anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALPatients received one NFLJI (needle-free liquid jet injection) of infiltration anesthesia at left or right upper lateral incisors using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle mental nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received one needle injection of mental nerve block at left or right lower premolar region using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle-free mental nerve block
EXPERIMENTALPatients received one NFLJI (needle-free liquid jet injection) of mental nerve block at left or right lower premolar region using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle mandibular nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received one needle injection of mandibular nerve block at left or right mandibular foramen using 2 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle-free mandibular nerve block
EXPERIMENTALPatients received one NFLJI (needle-free liquid jet injection) of mandibular nerve block at left or right mandibular foramen using 2 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle infraorbital nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received one needle injection of infraorbital nerve block at left or right canine fossa using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Needle-free infraorbital nerve block
EXPERIMENTALPatients received one NFLJI (needle-free liquid jet injection) of infraorbital nerve block at left or right canine fossa using 1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine (xylocaine).
Interventions
Performing local dental anesthesia using needle-free liquid jet injection with different parameters (pressure, volume, injection technique). Anesthetic agent: 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, dose: 0.3-2ml.
Performing local dental anesthesia using syringe and needles, same as regular clinical practice. Anesthestic agent: 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine,dose: 0.3-2ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18-35 years-old
- fluent in English
- cooperate
You may not qualify if:
- has a history of chronic pain,
- has a systematic disease,
- has root canal therapy at the upper lateral incisor/lower posterior teeth region.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
McGill University Faculty of Dentistry
Montreal, Quebec, H2X1G1, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Faleh Tamimi, Ph.D.
McGill University Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Each participant receive two anesthesia methods randomly. Total 8 arms, 4 groups, each group will recruit 6 participants. Incase of drop out, a total of 30 participant will be enrolled.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Accociate Dean
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
July 18, 2019
Primary Completion
December 15, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share