Comparing Analgesic Effects of Caudal and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Pediatrics Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Upper abdominal surgeries are painful and pediatric patients who undergo these operations require effective postoperative pain control. Epidural and caudal blocks are considered to be the gold standard regional analgesia techniques. Currently, ultrasound guidance is commonly used for caudal block performances to demonstrate the cannula placement and the deposition of local anesthetic. Additionally, erector spinae plane block can be a safer alternative for blocking the similar dermatomes. In this study, the aim is to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these two ultrasound-guided techniques in pediatric patients. The primary outcome of this study is the follow-up of FLACC/VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes are time to first analgesic requirement, number of patients who require rescue analgesic, possible side effects, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 25, 2022
CompletedMarch 29, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 years
December 16, 2019
March 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale/Visual Analog scale
Pain scores between 0-10
up to 48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
length of hospital stay
through study completion, an average of 1 week
number patients who require rescue analgesic
up to 48 hours
Time to first analgesic
up to 48 hours
Incidence of side effects/complications
up to first week
Time to first mobilization
up to 48 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Caudal Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORUS-guided caudal block with 0.7 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine
Erector Spinae Plane Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORUS-guided erector spinae plane block with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine
Interventions
Bupivacaine 0.25% 0.5 ml/kg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- undergoing upper abdominal surgery
- ASA(American Society of Anesthesiology)1-2
You may not qualify if:
- denial of patient or parents
- infection on the local anesthetic application area
- infection in the central nervous system
- coagulopathy
- brain tumors
- known allergy against local anesthetics
- anatomical difficulties
- with preexisting cardiac dysfunction
- with history of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
- Ultrasound-Guided Single-Shot Preemptive Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management.
- Erector Spinae Plane Block in Management of Pain After Kidney Transplantation.
- The Erector Spinae Plane Block.
- Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques.
- Expert opinion: regional nerve blocks in everyday pediatric urology: 2. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic caudal block.
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meltem Savran Karadeniz
Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2019
First Posted
December 18, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 15, 2022
Study Completion
February 25, 2022
Last Updated
March 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03